%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem : LCL592^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.6.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:15:00 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.24s 0.31s
% Output : Refutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 23
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 57 ( 46 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 341 ( 64 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 5 avg)
% Number of connectives : 450 ( 34 ~; 34 |; 0 &; 328 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 29 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 3 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 84 ( 84 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 39 ( 35 usr; 5 con; 0-4 aty)
% ( 25 !!; 0 ??; 0 @@+; 0 @@-)
% Number of variables : 136 ( 109 ^; 24 !; 3 ?; 136 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).
thf(type_def_6,type,
individuals: $tType ).
thf(func_def_1,type,
prop_a: $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_2,type,
prop_b: $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_3,type,
prop_c: $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_4,type,
mfalse: $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_5,type,
mtrue: $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_6,type,
mnot: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_8,type,
mor: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_9,type,
mand: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_10,type,
mimpl: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_11,type,
miff: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_12,type,
mbox: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_13,type,
mdia: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_14,type,
mall: ( individuals > $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_15,type,
mexists: ( individuals > $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_16,type,
mvalid: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(func_def_17,type,
msatisfiable: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(func_def_18,type,
mcountersatisfiable: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(func_def_19,type,
minvalid: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(func_def_22,type,
vLAM:
!>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( X1 > X0 > X1 ) ).
thf(func_def_23,type,
vNOT: $o > $o ).
thf(func_def_24,type,
db1:
!>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).
thf(func_def_25,type,
db0:
!>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).
thf(func_def_26,type,
vOR: $o > $o > $o ).
thf(func_def_27,type,
db2:
!>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).
thf(func_def_28,type,
vAND: $o > $o > $o ).
thf(func_def_29,type,
vPI:
!>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > $o ) ).
thf(func_def_30,type,
vIMP: $o > $o > $o ).
thf(func_def_31,type,
db3:
!>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).
thf(func_def_32,type,
vSIGMA:
!>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > $o ) ).
thf(func_def_33,type,
sK0: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_34,type,
sK1: $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_35,type,
sK2: $i > $o ).
thf(f3,axiom,
( mnot
= ( ^ [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
~ ( X0 @ X1 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL008^0.ax',mnot) ).
thf(f4,axiom,
( mor
= ( ^ [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o,X2: $i] :
( ( X1 @ X2 )
| ( X0 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL008^0.ax',mor) ).
thf(f6,axiom,
( mimpl
= ( ^ [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o] : ( mor @ ( mnot @ X0 ) @ X1 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL008^0.ax',mimpl) ).
thf(f8,axiom,
( mbox
= ( ^ [X0: $i > $i > $o,X1: $i > $o,X2: $i] :
! [X3: $i] :
( ( X0 @ X2 @ X3 )
=> ( X1 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL008^0.ax',mbox) ).
thf(f12,axiom,
( mvalid
= ( ^ [X0: $i > $o] :
! [X1: $i] : ( X0 @ X1 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL008^0.ax',mvalid) ).
thf(f16,conjecture,
! [X0: $i > $i > $o,X1: $i > $o,X2: $i > $o] : ( mvalid @ ( mimpl @ ( mbox @ X0 @ ( mimpl @ X1 @ X2 ) ) @ ( mimpl @ ( mbox @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( mbox @ X0 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm) ).
thf(f17,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0: $i > $i > $o,X1: $i > $o,X2: $i > $o] : ( mvalid @ ( mimpl @ ( mbox @ X0 @ ( mimpl @ X1 @ X2 ) ) @ ( mimpl @ ( mbox @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( mbox @ X0 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f16]) ).
thf(f20,plain,
( mnot
= ( ^ [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
~ ( X0 @ X1 ) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f3]) ).
thf(f21,plain,
( mnot
= ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i] :
~ ( Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f20]) ).
thf(f22,plain,
( mor
= ( ^ [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o,X2: $i] :
( ( X1 @ X2 )
| ( X0 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f4]) ).
thf(f23,plain,
( mor
= ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
( ( Y0 @ Y2 )
| ( Y1 @ Y2 ) ) ) ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f22]) ).
thf(f26,plain,
( mimpl
= ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o] : ( mor @ ( mnot @ Y0 ) @ Y1 ) ) ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f6]) ).
thf(f28,plain,
( mbox
= ( ^ [X0: $i > $i > $o,X1: $i > $o,X2: $i] :
! [X3: $i] :
( ( X0 @ X2 @ X3 )
=> ( X1 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f8]) ).
thf(f29,plain,
( mbox
= ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y3: $i] :
( ( Y0 @ Y2 @ Y3 )
=> ( Y1 @ Y3 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f28]) ).
thf(f36,plain,
( mvalid
= ( ^ [X0: $i > $o] :
! [X1: $i] : ( X0 @ X1 ) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f12]) ).
thf(f37,plain,
( mvalid
= ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y1: $i] : ( Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f36]) ).
thf(f44,plain,
~ ! [X0: $i > $i > $o,X1: $i > $o,X2: $i > $o] : ( mvalid @ ( mimpl @ ( mbox @ X0 @ ( mimpl @ X1 @ X2 ) ) @ ( mimpl @ ( mbox @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( mbox @ X0 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f17]) ).
thf(f45,plain,
~ ! [X0: $i > $i > $o,X1: $i > $o,X2: $i > $o] :
( ( mvalid @ ( mimpl @ ( mbox @ X0 @ ( mimpl @ X1 @ X2 ) ) @ ( mimpl @ ( mbox @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( mbox @ X0 @ X2 ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f44]) ).
thf(f46,plain,
? [X0: $i > $i > $o,X1: $i > $o,X2: $i > $o] :
( ( mvalid @ ( mimpl @ ( mbox @ X0 @ ( mimpl @ X1 @ X2 ) ) @ ( mimpl @ ( mbox @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( mbox @ X0 @ X2 ) ) ) )
!= $true ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f45]) ).
thf(f47,plain,
( $true
!= ( mvalid @ ( mimpl @ ( mbox @ sK0 @ ( mimpl @ sK1 @ sK2 ) ) @ ( mimpl @ ( mbox @ sK0 @ sK1 ) @ ( mbox @ sK0 @ sK2 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1),skolemize(X2,sK2)],[f46]) ).
thf(f50,plain,
( mnot
= ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i] :
~ ( Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).
thf(f51,plain,
( mor
= ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
( ( Y0 @ Y2 )
| ( Y1 @ Y2 ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23]) ).
thf(f53,plain,
( mimpl
= ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o] : ( mor @ ( mnot @ Y0 ) @ Y1 ) ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).
thf(f55,plain,
( mbox
= ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y3: $i] :
( ( Y0 @ Y2 @ Y3 )
=> ( Y1 @ Y3 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).
thf(f59,plain,
( mvalid
= ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y1: $i] : ( Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f37]) ).
thf(f63,plain,
( $true
!= ( mvalid @ ( mimpl @ ( mbox @ sK0 @ ( mimpl @ sK1 @ sK2 ) ) @ ( mimpl @ ( mbox @ sK0 @ sK1 ) @ ( mbox @ sK0 @ sK2 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f47]) ).
thf(f66,plain,
( mimpl
= ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o] :
( ^ [Y2: $i > $o,Y3: $i > $o,Y4: $i] :
( ( Y2 @ Y4 )
| ( Y3 @ Y4 ) )
@ ( ^ [Y2: $i > $o,Y3: $i] :
~ ( Y2 @ Y3 )
@ Y0 )
@ Y1 ) ) ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f53,f51,f50]) ).
thf(f68,plain,
( $true
!= ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y1: $i] : ( Y0 @ Y1 ) )
@ ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o] :
( ^ [Y2: $i > $o,Y3: $i > $o,Y4: $i] :
( ( Y2 @ Y4 )
| ( Y3 @ Y4 ) )
@ ( ^ [Y2: $i > $o,Y3: $i] :
~ ( Y2 @ Y3 )
@ Y0 )
@ Y1 )
@ ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y3: $i] :
( ( Y0 @ Y2 @ Y3 )
=> ( Y1 @ Y3 ) ) )
@ sK0
@ ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o] :
( ^ [Y2: $i > $o,Y3: $i > $o,Y4: $i] :
( ( Y2 @ Y4 )
| ( Y3 @ Y4 ) )
@ ( ^ [Y2: $i > $o,Y3: $i] :
~ ( Y2 @ Y3 )
@ Y0 )
@ Y1 )
@ sK1
@ sK2 ) )
@ ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o] :
( ^ [Y2: $i > $o,Y3: $i > $o,Y4: $i] :
( ( Y2 @ Y4 )
| ( Y3 @ Y4 ) )
@ ( ^ [Y2: $i > $o,Y3: $i] :
~ ( Y2 @ Y3 )
@ Y0 )
@ Y1 )
@ ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y3: $i] :
( ( Y0 @ Y2 @ Y3 )
=> ( Y1 @ Y3 ) ) )
@ sK0
@ sK1 )
@ ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y3: $i] :
( ( Y0 @ Y2 @ Y3 )
=> ( Y1 @ Y3 ) ) )
@ sK0
@ sK2 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f63,f59,f66,f55,f66,f66,f55,f55]) ).
thf(f69,plain,
( $true
!= ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ~ ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y1: $i] :
( ( sK0 @ Y0 @ Y1 )
=> ( ~ ( sK1 @ Y1 )
| ( sK2 @ Y1 ) ) ) )
| ~ ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y1: $i] :
( ( sK0 @ Y0 @ Y1 )
=> ( sK1 @ Y1 ) ) )
| ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y1: $i] :
( ( sK0 @ Y0 @ Y1 )
=> ( sK2 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f68]) ).
thf(f70,plain,
( $false
= ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ~ ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y1: $i] :
( ( sK0 @ Y0 @ Y1 )
=> ( ~ ( sK1 @ Y1 )
| ( sK2 @ Y1 ) ) ) )
| ~ ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y1: $i] :
( ( sK0 @ Y0 @ Y1 )
=> ( sK1 @ Y1 ) ) )
| ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y1: $i] :
( ( sK0 @ Y0 @ Y1 )
=> ( sK2 @ Y1 ) ) ) )
@ sK3 ) ),
inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f69]) ).
thf(f71,plain,
( $false
= ( ~ ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ( sK0 @ sK3 @ Y0 )
=> ( ~ ( sK1 @ Y0 )
| ( sK2 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
| ~ ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ( sK0 @ sK3 @ Y0 )
=> ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) )
| ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ( sK0 @ sK3 @ Y0 )
=> ( sK2 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f70]) ).
thf(f72,plain,
( $false
= ( ~ ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ( sK0 @ sK3 @ Y0 )
=> ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) )
| ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ( sK0 @ sK3 @ Y0 )
=> ( sK2 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f71]) ).
thf(f73,plain,
( $false
= ( ~ ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ( sK0 @ sK3 @ Y0 )
=> ( ~ ( sK1 @ Y0 )
| ( sK2 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f71]) ).
thf(f74,plain,
( $true
= ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ( sK0 @ sK3 @ Y0 )
=> ( ~ ( sK1 @ Y0 )
| ( sK2 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f73]) ).
thf(f75,plain,
! [X1: $i] :
( $true
= ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ( sK0 @ sK3 @ Y0 )
=> ( ~ ( sK1 @ Y0 )
| ( sK2 @ Y0 ) ) )
@ X1 ) ),
inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f74]) ).
thf(f76,plain,
! [X1: $i] :
( $true
= ( ( sK0 @ sK3 @ X1 )
=> ( ~ ( sK1 @ X1 )
| ( sK2 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f75]) ).
thf(f77,plain,
! [X1: $i] :
( ( $false
= ( sK0 @ sK3 @ X1 ) )
| ( $true
= ( ~ ( sK1 @ X1 )
| ( sK2 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f76]) ).
thf(f78,plain,
! [X1: $i] :
( ( $false
= ( sK0 @ sK3 @ X1 ) )
| ( $true
= ( sK2 @ X1 ) )
| ( $true
= ( ~ ( sK1 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f77]) ).
thf(f79,plain,
! [X1: $i] :
( ( $false
= ( sK0 @ sK3 @ X1 ) )
| ( $true
= ( sK2 @ X1 ) )
| ( $false
= ( sK1 @ X1 ) ) ),
inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f78]) ).
thf(f80,plain,
( $false
= ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ( sK0 @ sK3 @ Y0 )
=> ( sK2 @ Y0 ) ) ) ),
inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f72]) ).
thf(f81,plain,
( $false
= ( ~ ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ( sK0 @ sK3 @ Y0 )
=> ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f72]) ).
thf(f82,plain,
( $true
= ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ( sK0 @ sK3 @ Y0 )
=> ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ),
inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f81]) ).
thf(f83,plain,
! [X1: $i] :
( $true
= ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ( sK0 @ sK3 @ Y0 )
=> ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
@ X1 ) ),
inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f82]) ).
thf(f84,plain,
! [X1: $i] :
( $true
= ( ( sK0 @ sK3 @ X1 )
=> ( sK1 @ X1 ) ) ),
inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f83]) ).
thf(f85,plain,
! [X1: $i] :
( ( $false
= ( sK0 @ sK3 @ X1 ) )
| ( $true
= ( sK1 @ X1 ) ) ),
inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f84]) ).
thf(f86,plain,
( $false
= ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ( sK0 @ sK3 @ Y0 )
=> ( sK2 @ Y0 ) )
@ sK4 ) ),
inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f80]) ).
thf(f87,plain,
( $false
= ( ( sK0 @ sK3 @ sK4 )
=> ( sK2 @ sK4 ) ) ),
inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f86]) ).
thf(f88,plain,
( $false
= ( sK2 @ sK4 ) ),
inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f87]) ).
thf(f89,plain,
( $true
= ( sK0 @ sK3 @ sK4 ) ),
inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f87]) ).
thf(f97,plain,
( ( $false = $true )
| ( $true
= ( sK1 @ sK4 ) ) ),
inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f89,f85]) ).
thf(f98,plain,
( $true
= ( sK1 @ sK4 ) ),
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f97]) ).
thf(f131,plain,
( ( $false = $true )
| ( $true
= ( sK2 @ sK4 ) )
| ( $false
= ( sK1 @ sK4 ) ) ),
inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f89,f79]) ).
thf(f132,plain,
( ( $true
= ( sK2 @ sK4 ) )
| ( $false
= ( sK1 @ sK4 ) ) ),
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f131]) ).
thf(f134,plain,
( ( $false = $true )
| ( $false
= ( sK1 @ sK4 ) ) ),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f132,f88]) ).
thf(f135,plain,
( $false
= ( sK1 @ sK4 ) ),
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f134]) ).
thf(f145,plain,
$false = $true,
inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f98,f135]) ).
thf(f146,plain,
$false,
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f145]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : LCL592^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.6.0.
% 0.00/0.06 % Command : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.09/0.22 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.22 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.22 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.22 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.22 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.22 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.23 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.23 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 09:06:37 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.23 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.23 Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.24/0.28 Running first-order model finding
% 0.24/0.28 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/0.31 % (1029607)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.24/0.31 % (1029614)dis+10_161_sil=256000:plsq=on:plsqr=61199697,1048576:gs=on:alpa=true:sac=on:slsq=on:cn=on:random_seed=2549750822:i=88024:add=on:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/88024Mi)
% 0.24/0.31 % (1029614) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-1029607-1029614"...
% 0.24/0.31 % (1029613)% WARNING: option uhcvi not known.
% 0.24/0.31 % (1029614)...printing done.
% 0.24/0.31 % (1029614)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.24/0.31 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.24/0.31 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.24/0.32 % (1029614)------------------------------
% 0.24/0.32 % (1029614)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.24/0.32 % (1029614)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.24/0.32 % (1029614)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.24/0.32 % (1029614)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.24/0.32 % (1029614)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.24/0.32 % (1029614)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.24/0.32 % (1029614)Instructions burned: 10 (million)
% 0.24/0.32 % (1029607)Success in time 0.028 s
% 0.24/0.32 % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------