↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : LCL597^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:14:06 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.15s 1.30s
% Output   : Refutation 3.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL597^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.6.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.10/0.21  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.21  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.21  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.21  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.21  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.21  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.21  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.21  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 09:05:23 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.22  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.22  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.68/0.53  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.13/0.66  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (127ms). 
% 1.13/0.67  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.47/0.87  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.47/0.87  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.75/0.94  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 1.75/0.95  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 1.75/0.95  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 1.75/0.96  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 1.75/0.96  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.15/1.30  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.15/1.30  % Time passed: 992ms (effective reasoning time: 625ms)
% 3.15/1.30  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.15/1.30  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 3.15/1.30  % No. of inferences in proof: 8
% 3.15/1.30  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 992 ms resp. 625 ms w/o parsing
% 3.15/1.34  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.15/1.34  thf(individuals_type, type, individuals: $tType).
% 3.15/1.34  thf(mnot_decl, type, mnot: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o))).
% 3.15/1.34  thf(mor_decl, type, mor: (($i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 3.15/1.34  thf(mimpl_decl, type, mimpl: (($i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 3.15/1.34  thf(mbox_decl, type, mbox: (($i > ($i > $o)) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 3.15/1.34  thf(mvalid_decl, type, mvalid: (($i > $o) > $o)).
% 3.15/1.34  thf(sk1_decl, type, sk1: (($i > ($i > $o)) > ($i > $o))).
% 3.15/1.34  thf(sk2_decl, type, sk2: (($i > ($i > $o)) > $i)).
% 3.15/1.34  thf(sk3_decl, type, sk3: (($i > ($i > $o)) > $i)).
% 3.15/1.34  thf(sk4_decl, type, sk4: (($i > ($i > $o)) > $i)).
% 3.15/1.34  thf(mnot_def, definition, mnot = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:$i]: ~ (A @ B)) ).
% 3.15/1.34  thf(mor_def, definition, mor = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:($i > $o),C:$i]: ((A @ C) | (B @ C))) ).
% 3.15/1.34  thf(mimpl_def, definition, mimpl = (^ [A:($i > $o)]: (mor @ (mnot @ A))) ).
% 3.15/1.34  thf(mbox_def, definition, mbox = (^ [A:($i > ($i > $o)),B:($i > $o),C:$i]: ! [D:$i]: ((A @ C @ D) => (B @ D))) ).
% 3.15/1.34  thf(mvalid_def, definition, mvalid = ((!) @ $i) ).
% 3.15/1.34  thf(sk1_def, definition, sk1 = (^ [A:($i > ($i > $o))]: (@+ [B:($i > $o)]: ~ (! [C:$i]: (~ (! [D:$i]: ((A @ C @ D) => (B @ D))) | ! [D:$i]: ((A @ C @ D) => (! [E:$i]: ((A @ D @ E) => (B @ E)))))))) ).
% 3.15/1.34  thf(sk2_def, definition, sk2 = (^ [A:($i > ($i > $o))]: (@+ [B:$i]: ~ (~ (! [C:$i]: ((A @ B @ C) => (sk1 @ A @ C))) | ! [C:$i]: ((A @ B @ C) => (! [D:$i]: ((A @ C @ D) => (sk1 @ A @ D))))))) ).
% 3.15/1.34  thf(sk3_def, definition, sk3 = (^ [A:($i > ($i > $o))]: (@+ [B:$i]: ~ ((A @ (sk2 @ A) @ B) => (! [C:$i]: ((A @ B @ C) => (sk1 @ A @ C)))))) ).
% 3.15/1.34  thf(sk4_def, definition, sk4 = (^ [A:($i > ($i > $o))]: (@+ [B:$i]: ~ ((A @ (sk3 @ A) @ B) => (sk1 @ A @ B)))) ).
% 3.15/1.34  thf(1,conjecture,((? [A:($i > ($i > $o))]: ! [B:($i > $o)]: (mvalid @ (mimpl @ (mbox @ A @ B) @ (mbox @ A @ (mbox @ A @ B)))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm)).
% 3.15/1.34  thf(2,negated_conjecture,((~ (? [A:($i > ($i > $o))]: ! [B:($i > $o)]: (mvalid @ (mimpl @ (mbox @ A @ B) @ (mbox @ A @ (mbox @ A @ B))))))),inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1])).
% 3.15/1.34  thf(3,plain,((~ (? [A:($i > ($i > $o))]: ! [B:($i > $o),C:$i]: (~ (! [D:$i]: ((A @ C @ D) => (B @ D))) | ! [D:$i]: ((A @ C @ D) => (! [E:$i]: ((A @ D @ E) => (B @ E)))))))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2])).
% 3.15/1.34  thf(4,plain,(! [B:$i,A:($i > ($i > $o))] : (((~ (A @ (sk2 @ (A)) @ B) | (sk1 @ (A) @ B)) & (A @ (sk2 @ (A)) @ (sk3 @ (A))) & (A @ (sk3 @ (A)) @ (sk4 @ (A))) & ~ (sk1 @ (A) @ (sk4 @ (A)))))),inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3])).
% 3.15/1.34  thf(8,plain,(! [A:($i > ($i > $o))] : ((~ (sk1 @ (A) @ (sk4 @ (A)))))),inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4])).
% 3.15/1.34  thf(6,plain,(! [A:($i > ($i > $o))] : ((A @ (sk2 @ (A)) @ (sk3 @ (A))))),inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4])).
% 3.15/1.34  thf(9,plain,(~ (($true))),inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[8,6])).
% 3.15/1.34  thf(10,plain,(($false)),inference(simp,[status(thm)],[9])).
% 3.15/1.34  % SZS output end Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.15/1.34  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------