↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : LCL626^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:14:09 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.90s 2.29s
% Output   : Refutation 4.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL626^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.09/0.20  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.20  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.20  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.20  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.20  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.20  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.20  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.21  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 09:35:07 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.21  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.21  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.03/0.80  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.54/1.08  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (282ms). 
% 1.54/1.10  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.24/1.50  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.44/1.50  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.63/1.68  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 1 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.86/1.72  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 1 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.86/1.72  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.86/1.72  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.86/1.73  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.90/2.29  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.90/2.29  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.90/2.29  % Time passed: 1938ms (effective reasoning time: 1185ms)
% 3.90/2.29  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.90/2.29  % Axioms used in derivation (1): upwf_trans
% 3.90/2.29  % No. of inferences in proof: 6
% 3.90/2.29  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1938 ms resp. 1185 ms w/o parsing
% 4.17/2.35  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.17/2.35  thf(individuals_type, type, individuals: $tType).
% 4.17/2.35  thf(mnot_decl, type, mnot: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o))).
% 4.17/2.35  thf(mor_decl, type, mor: (($i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 4.17/2.35  thf(mimpl_decl, type, mimpl: (($i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 4.17/2.35  thf(mbox_decl, type, mbox: (($i > ($i > $o)) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 4.17/2.35  thf(mvalid_decl, type, mvalid: (($i > $o) > $o)).
% 4.17/2.35  thf(transitive_decl, type, transitive: (($i > ($i > $o)) > $o)).
% 4.17/2.35  thf(upwards_well_founded_decl, type, upwards_well_founded: (($i > ($i > $o)) > $o)).
% 4.17/2.35  thf(r_decl, type, r: ($i > ($i > $o))).
% 4.17/2.35  thf(mnot_def, definition, mnot = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:$i]: ~ (A @ B)) ).
% 4.17/2.35  thf(mor_def, definition, mor = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:($i > $o),C:$i]: ((A @ C) | (B @ C))) ).
% 4.17/2.35  thf(mimpl_def, definition, mimpl = (^ [A:($i > $o)]: (mor @ (mnot @ A))) ).
% 4.17/2.35  thf(mbox_def, definition, mbox = (^ [A:($i > ($i > $o)),B:($i > $o),C:$i]: ! [D:$i]: ((A @ C @ D) => (B @ D))) ).
% 4.17/2.35  thf(mvalid_def, definition, mvalid = ((!) @ $i) ).
% 4.17/2.35  thf(transitive_def, definition, transitive = (^ [A:($i > ($i > $o))]: ! [B:$i,C:$i,D:$i]: (((A @ B @ C) & (A @ C @ D)) => (A @ B @ D))) ).
% 4.17/2.35  thf(upwards_well_founded_def, definition, upwards_well_founded = (^ [A:($i > ($i > $o))]: ! [B:($i > $o),C:$i]: ((B @ C) => (? [D:$i]: ((B @ D) & ! [E:$i]: ((A @ D @ D) => (~ (B @ E))))))) ).
% 4.17/2.35  thf(1,conjecture,((! [A:($i > $o)]: (mvalid @ (mimpl @ (mbox @ r @ A) @ (mbox @ r @ (mbox @ r @ (mbox @ r @ A))))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',k4)).
% 4.17/2.35  thf(2,negated_conjecture,((~ (! [A:($i > $o)]: (mvalid @ (mimpl @ (mbox @ r @ A) @ (mbox @ r @ (mbox @ r @ (mbox @ r @ A)))))))),inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1])).
% 4.17/2.35  thf(4,plain,((~ (! [A:($i > $o),B:$i]: (~ (! [C:$i]: ((r @ B @ C) => (A @ C))) | ! [C:$i]: ((r @ B @ C) => (! [D:$i]: ((r @ C @ D) => (! [E:$i]: ((r @ D @ E) => (A @ E)))))))))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2])).
% 4.17/2.35  thf(3,axiom,(((transitive @ r) & (upwards_well_founded @ r))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',upwf_trans)).
% 4.17/2.35  thf(11,plain,((! [A:$i,B:$i,C:$i]: (((r @ A @ B) & (r @ B @ C)) => (r @ A @ C)) & ! [A:($i > $o),B:$i]: ((A @ B) => (? [C:$i]: ((A @ C) & ! [D:$i]: ((r @ C @ C) => (~ (A @ D)))))))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3])).
% 4.17/2.35  thf(18,plain,(($false)),inference(e,[status(thm)],[4,11])).
% 4.17/2.35  % SZS output end Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.17/2.35  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------