↑ Up

Enigma---0.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : LCL638+1.001 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 11:45:08 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 11.72s 3.76s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 11.72s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   28 (   7 unt;   8 nHn;  28 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   77 (   0 equ;  43 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   34 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( p1(X1)
    | r1(X2,esk6_1(X2))
    | ~ r1(X3,X1)
    | ~ r1(X2,X3)
    | ~ r1(esk1_0,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kwqbr2jh/lgb.p',i_0_6) ).

cnf(i_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    r1(esk1_0,esk8_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kwqbr2jh/lgb.p',i_0_3) ).

cnf(i_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( r1(X1,esk7_1(X1))
    | ~ r1(esk1_0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kwqbr2jh/lgb.p',i_0_4) ).

cnf(i_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( p1(X1)
    | r1(X2,esk2_2(X1,X2))
    | ~ r1(X1,X2)
    | ~ r1(esk1_0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kwqbr2jh/lgb.p',i_0_14) ).

cnf(i_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p1(esk8_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kwqbr2jh/lgb.p',i_0_2) ).

cnf(i_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( p1(X1)
    | ~ r1(X1,X2)
    | ~ r1(esk1_0,X1)
    | ~ p1(esk2_2(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kwqbr2jh/lgb.p',i_0_13) ).

cnf(i_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( p1(X1)
    | ~ r1(X2,X1)
    | ~ r1(X3,X2)
    | ~ p1(esk6_1(X3))
    | ~ r1(esk1_0,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kwqbr2jh/lgb.p',i_0_5) ).

cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ( p1(X1)
    | ~ r1(esk8_0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-kwqbr2jh/lgb.p',i_0_1) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( p1(X1)
    | r1(X2,esk6_1(X2))
    | ~ r1(X3,X1)
    | ~ r1(X2,X3)
    | ~ r1(esk1_0,X2) ),
    i_0_6 ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    r1(esk1_0,esk8_0),
    i_0_3 ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( p1(X1)
    | r1(esk8_0,esk6_1(esk8_0))
    | ~ r1(esk8_0,X2)
    | ~ r1(X2,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( r1(X1,esk7_1(X1))
    | ~ r1(esk1_0,X1) ),
    i_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( p1(X1)
    | r1(X2,esk2_2(X1,X2))
    | ~ r1(X1,X2)
    | ~ r1(esk1_0,X1) ),
    i_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p1(esk8_0),
    i_0_2 ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( p1(X1)
    | r1(esk8_0,esk6_1(esk8_0))
    | ~ r1(esk7_1(esk8_0),X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( r1(X1,esk2_2(esk8_0,X1))
    | ~ r1(esk8_0,X1) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_24]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( p1(esk2_2(esk8_0,esk7_1(esk8_0)))
    | r1(esk8_0,esk6_1(esk8_0))
    | ~ r1(esk8_0,esk7_1(esk8_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( p1(X1)
    | ~ r1(X1,X2)
    | ~ r1(esk1_0,X1)
    | ~ p1(esk2_2(X1,X2)) ),
    i_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ( p1(esk2_2(esk8_0,esk7_1(esk8_0)))
    | r1(esk8_0,esk6_1(esk8_0)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_26]),c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( p1(X1)
    | ~ r1(X2,X1)
    | ~ r1(X3,X2)
    | ~ p1(esk6_1(X3))
    | ~ r1(esk1_0,X3) ),
    i_0_5 ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ( p1(X1)
    | ~ r1(esk8_0,X1) ),
    i_0_1 ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ( r1(esk8_0,esk6_1(esk8_0))
    | ~ r1(esk8_0,esk7_1(esk8_0)) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_24])]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ( p1(X1)
    | ~ r1(esk8_0,esk6_1(X2))
    | ~ r1(esk1_0,X2)
    | ~ r1(X2,X3)
    | ~ r1(X3,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    r1(esk8_0,esk6_1(esk8_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_26]),c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ( p1(X1)
    | ~ r1(esk8_0,X2)
    | ~ r1(X2,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ( p1(X1)
    | ~ r1(esk6_1(esk8_0),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    p1(esk2_2(esk8_0,esk6_1(esk8_0))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_30]),c_0_38])]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_41]),c_0_24]),c_0_38])]),c_0_28]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL638+1.001 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Sep  4 19:42:00 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.46  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 11.72/3.76  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 11.72/3.76  # No SInE strategy applied
% 11.72/3.76  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 11.72/3.76  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 11.72/3.76  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 11.72/3.76  #
% 11.72/3.76  # Preprocessing time       : 0.024 s
% 11.72/3.76  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 11.72/3.76  
% 11.72/3.76  # Proof found!
% 11.72/3.76  # SZS status Theorem
% 11.72/3.76  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 11.72/3.76  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 11.72/3.76  
% 11.72/3.76  # -------------------------------------------------
% 11.72/3.76  # User time                : 0.028 s
% 11.72/3.76  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 11.72/3.76  # Total time               : 0.034 s
% 11.72/3.76  # Maximum resident set size: 3328 pages
% 11.72/3.76  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------