%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : LCL645-10.001 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:14:51 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.23s 0.95s
% Output : Saturation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_9ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_10ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
a != b,
c_0_9,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
ifeq2(r1(sK1_main_Y,X1),true,p1(X1),true) = true,
main_3,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
ifeq2(r1(sK2_main_Y,X1),true,p1(X1),true) = true,
main_2,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
ifeq(p1(sK1_main_Y),true,a,b) = b,
main_5,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
ifeq(p1(sK2_main_Y),true,a,b) = b,
main_4,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
ifeq_axiom_001,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
ifeq2(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
ifeq_axiom,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
r1(sK3_main_X,sK1_main_Y) = true,
main_1,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
r1(sK3_main_X,sK2_main_Y) = true,
main,
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : LCL645-10.001 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.83 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.83 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.83 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.83 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.83 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.84 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.84 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.84 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 00:39:27 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.84 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.84 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.23/0.90 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.90 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/0.95 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.23/0.95 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.95 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.95 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.95 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.95 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.95 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.95 % new_bool_3 with pid 1046748 completed with status 1
% 0.23/0.95 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.23/0.95 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.95 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.95 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.95 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.95 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.23/0.95 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.95 % Search class: FUUPM-FFSS32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.95 % partial match(1): FUUPM-FFSF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.95 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.95 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.95 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1046751 completed with status 1
% 0.23/0.95 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.23/0.95 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.95 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.95 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.95 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.95 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.23/0.95 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.95 % Search class: FUUPM-FFSS32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.95 % partial match(1): FUUPM-FFSF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.95 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.95 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.95 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.23/0.95
% 0.23/0.95 % No proof found!
% 0.23/0.95 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.23/0.95 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.95 % Parsed axioms : 9
% 0.23/0.95 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.23/0.95 % Initial clauses : 9
% 0.23/0.95 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/0.95 % Initial clauses in saturation : 9
% 0.23/0.95 % Processed clauses : 9
% 0.23/0.95 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.23/0.95 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.95 % ...remaining for further processing : 9
% 0.23/0.95 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/0.95 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/0.95 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.95 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.23/0.95 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.95 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.23/0.95 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.95 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/0.95 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.23/0.95 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/0.95 % NegExts : 0
% 0.23/0.95 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/0.95 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.23/0.95 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.23/0.95 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.23/0.95 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.23/0.95 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.23/0.95 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/0.95 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.95 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/0.95 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.23/0.95 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.95 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.95 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.95 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.95 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.95 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.95 % Current number of processed clauses : 9
% 0.23/0.95 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 8
% 0.23/0.95 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.95 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.23/0.95 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.95 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.95 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.23/0.95 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/0.95 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.95 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.23/0.95 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/0.95 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.23/0.95 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/0.95 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/0.95 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.23/0.95 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.23/0.95 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/0.95 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/0.95 % Termbank termtop insertions : 139
% 0.23/0.95 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2
% 0.23/0.95
% 0.23/0.95 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.95 % User time : 0.002 s
% 0.23/0.95 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.23/0.95 % Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.23/0.95 % Maximum resident set size: 3632 pages
% 0.23/0.95
% 0.23/0.95 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.95 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.23/0.95 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.23/0.95 % Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.23/0.95 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.23/0.95 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------