↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : LCL648+1.001 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 11:19:27 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.53s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem    : LCL648+1.001 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.08/0.36  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % DateTime   : Fri Sep  4 12:24:26 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.37  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.53  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.53  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.21/0.53  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.53  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.21/0.53  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.21/0.53  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.21/0.53  
% 0.21/0.53  % Result      :Theorem 0.003300s
% 0.21/0.53  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.003300s
% 0.21/0.53  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53  % File     : LCL648+1.001 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.21/0.53  % Domain   : Logic Calculi (Modal Logic)
% 0.21/0.53  % Problem  : In K, pigeonhole formulae, size 1
% 0.21/0.53  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.21/0.53  % English  :
% 0.21/0.53  
% 0.21/0.53  % Refs     : [BHS00] Balsiger et al. (2000), A Benchmark Method for the Pro
% 0.21/0.53  %          : [Kam08] Kaminski (2008), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.21/0.53  % Source   : [Kam08]
% 0.21/0.53  % Names    : k_ph_p [BHS00]
% 0.21/0.53  
% 0.21/0.53  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.21/0.53  % Rating   : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.09 v5.2.0, 0.00 v4.1.0, 0.06 v4.0.1, 0.05 v4.0.0
% 0.21/0.53  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    1 (   0 unt;   0 def)
% 0.21/0.53  %            Number of atoms       :    6 (   0 equ)
% 0.21/0.53  %            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   6 avg)
% 0.21/0.53  %            Number of connectives :   12 (   7   ~;   3   |;   2   &)
% 0.21/0.53  %                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.21/0.53  %            Maximal formula depth :   10 (  10 avg)
% 0.21/0.53  %            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
% 0.21/0.53  %            Number of predicates  :    3 (   3 usr;   0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.21/0.53  %            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
% 0.21/0.53  %            Number of variables   :    3 (   2   !;   1   ?)
% 0.21/0.53  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.21/0.53  
% 0.21/0.53  % Comments : A naive relational encoding of the modal logic problem into
% 0.21/0.53  %            first-order logic.
% 0.21/0.53  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53  fof(main,conjecture,
% 0.21/0.53      ~ ? [X] :
% 0.21/0.53          ~ ( ~ ! [Y] :
% 0.21/0.53                  ( ~ r1(X,Y)
% 0.21/0.53                  | ~ ( p201(Y)
% 0.21/0.53                      & p101(Y) ) )
% 0.21/0.53            | ! [Y] :
% 0.21/0.53                ( ~ r1(X,Y)
% 0.21/0.53                | ~ ( p201(Y)
% 0.21/0.53                    & p101(Y) ) ) ) ).
% 0.21/0.53  
% 0.21/0.53  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53  % Proof found
% 0.21/0.53  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.53  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.21/0.53  %ClaNum:4(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.21/0.53  %VarNum:3(SingletonVarNum:1)
% 0.21/0.53  %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.21/0.53  %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 0.21/0.53  %SharedTerms:5
% 0.21/0.53  %goalClause: 1 2 3 4
% 0.21/0.53  %singleGoalClaCount:3
% 0.21/0.53  [1]P1(a1)
% 0.21/0.53  [2]P2(a1)
% 0.21/0.53  [3]P3(a2,a1)
% 0.21/0.53  [4]~P2(x41)+~P1(x41)+~P3(a2,x41)
% 0.21/0.53  %EqnAxiom
% 0.21/0.53  
% 0.21/0.53  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53  cnf(5,plain,
% 0.21/0.53     ($false),
% 0.21/0.53     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,1,3,4]),
% 0.21/0.53     ['proof']).
% 0.21/0.53  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.21/0.53  % Total time :0.003300s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------