↑ Up

Etableau---0.67.CSA-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : LCL651+1.001 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 12:01:36 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : CounterSatisfiable 0.10s 0.41s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : LCL651+1.001 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Sun Sep  6 01:08:31 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.39  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.10/0.39  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2SI
% 0.10/0.39  # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% 0.10/0.39  #
% 0.10/0.39  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.10/0.39  # Number of axioms: 28 Number of unprocessed: 28
% 0.10/0.39  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.10/0.39  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.10/0.39  # Hello from C++
% 0.10/0.39  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.10/0.39  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.10/0.39  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.10/0.39  # 28 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.10/0.39  # Creating start rules for all 28 conjectures.
% 0.10/0.39  # There are 28 start rule candidates:
% 0.10/0.39  # Found 12 unit axioms.
% 0.10/0.39  # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.10/0.39  # 28 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.10/0.39  # 16 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.10/0.39  # 12 unit axiom clauses
% 0.10/0.39  
% 0.10/0.39  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.10/0.41  # 2992180 Satisfiable branch
% 0.10/0.41  # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.10/0.41  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.10/0.41  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.10/0.41  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.10/0.41  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.10/0.41  # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.10/0.41  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.10/0.41  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.10/0.41  # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.10/0.41  # SZS status CounterSatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.41  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.41  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.10/0.41  
% 0.10/0.41  # End clausification derivation
% 0.10/0.41  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_28, negated_conjecture, (r1(esk1_0,esk2_0))).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_22, negated_conjecture, (r1(esk1_0,esk7_0))).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_6, negated_conjecture, (r1(esk1_0,esk11_0))).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_27, negated_conjecture, (r1(esk2_0,esk3_0))).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_26, negated_conjecture, (r1(esk3_0,esk4_0))).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_25, negated_conjecture, (r1(esk4_0,esk5_0))).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_24, negated_conjecture, (r1(esk5_0,esk6_0))).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_5, negated_conjecture, (r1(esk11_0,esk12_0))).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_4, negated_conjecture, (r1(esk12_0,esk13_0))).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_3, negated_conjecture, (r1(esk13_0,esk14_0))).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_2, negated_conjecture, (r1(esk14_0,esk15_0))).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_21, negated_conjecture, (~p6(esk7_0))).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_17, negated_conjecture, (~p5(esk8_1(X1))|~r1(esk1_0,X1))).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_1, negated_conjecture, (~p3(esk15_0)|~p5(esk15_0)|~p1(esk15_0)|~p2(esk15_0)|~p4(esk15_0))).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_23, negated_conjecture, (p2(esk6_0)|p4(esk6_0)|p6(esk6_0)|p8(esk6_0)|p10(esk6_0))).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_18, negated_conjecture, (r1(X1,esk8_1(X1))|~r1(esk1_0,X1))).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_14, negated_conjecture, (r1(X1,esk9_2(X2,X1))|~r1(esk1_0,X2)|~r1(X2,X1))).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_10, negated_conjecture, (r1(X1,esk10_3(X2,X3,X1))|~r1(esk1_0,X2)|~r1(X3,X1)|~r1(X2,X3))).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_13, negated_conjecture, (~p4(esk9_2(X1,X2))|~r1(esk1_0,X1)|~r1(X1,X2))).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_9, negated_conjecture, (~p3(esk10_3(X1,X2,X3))|~r1(esk1_0,X1)|~r1(X2,X3)|~r1(X1,X2))).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_19, negated_conjecture, (~p1(X1)|~p4(X1)|~r1(esk1_0,X2)|~r1(X2,X3)|~r1(X3,X4)|~r1(X4,X5)|~r1(X5,X1))).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_15, negated_conjecture, (~p3(X1)|~p4(X1)|~r1(esk1_0,X2)|~r1(X2,X3)|~r1(X3,X4)|~r1(X4,X5)|~r1(X5,X1))).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_20, negated_conjecture, (p1(X1)|p4(X1)|~r1(esk1_0,X2)|~r1(X2,X3)|~r1(X3,X4)|~r1(X4,X5)|~r1(X5,X1))).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_7, negated_conjecture, (~p1(X1)|~p2(X1)|~r1(esk1_0,X2)|~r1(X2,X3)|~r1(X3,X4)|~r1(X4,X5)|~r1(X5,X1))).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_11, negated_conjecture, (~p3(X1)|~p2(X1)|~r1(esk1_0,X2)|~r1(X2,X3)|~r1(X3,X4)|~r1(X4,X5)|~r1(X5,X1))).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_16, negated_conjecture, (p3(X1)|p4(X1)|~r1(esk1_0,X2)|~r1(X2,X3)|~r1(X3,X4)|~r1(X4,X5)|~r1(X5,X1))).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_8, negated_conjecture, (p1(X1)|p2(X1)|~r1(esk1_0,X2)|~r1(X2,X3)|~r1(X3,X4)|~r1(X4,X5)|~r1(X5,X1))).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_12, negated_conjecture, (p3(X1)|p2(X1)|~r1(esk1_0,X2)|~r1(X2,X3)|~r1(X3,X4)|~r1(X4,X5)|~r1(X5,X1))).
% 0.10/0.41  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.10/0.41  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.10/0.41  # Found 18 steps
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_12, negated_conjecture, (p3(esk15_0)|p2(esk15_0)|~r1(esk1_0,esk11_0)|~r1(esk11_0,esk12_0)|~r1(esk12_0,esk13_0)|~r1(esk13_0,esk14_0)|~r1(esk14_0,esk15_0)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_31, plain, (~r1(esk1_0,esk11_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_6])).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_32, plain, (~r1(esk11_0,esk12_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_5])).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_33, plain, (~r1(esk12_0,esk13_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_4])).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_34, plain, (~r1(esk13_0,esk14_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_3])).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_35, plain, (~r1(esk14_0,esk15_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_2])).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_29, plain, (p3(esk15_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_169, plain, (~r1(esk1_0,esk11_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_6])).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_170, plain, (~r1(esk11_0,esk12_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_5])).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_171, plain, (~r1(esk12_0,esk13_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_4])).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_172, plain, (~r1(esk13_0,esk14_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_3])).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_173, plain, (~r1(esk14_0,esk15_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_2])).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_168, plain, (~p4(esk15_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_20])).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_211, plain, (~r1(esk1_0,esk11_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_6])).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_212, plain, (~r1(esk11_0,esk12_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_5])).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_213, plain, (~r1(esk12_0,esk13_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_4])).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_214, plain, (~r1(esk13_0,esk14_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_3])).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_215, plain, (~r1(esk14_0,esk15_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_2])).
% 0.10/0.41  # End printing tableau
% 0.10/0.41  # SZS output end
% 0.10/0.41  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.10/0.41  # Child (2992180) has found a proof.
% 0.10/0.41  
% 0.10/0.41  # Proof search is over...
% 0.10/0.41  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------