%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : LCL662+1.001 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep 7 11:47:42 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 15.81s 4.37s
% Output : CNFRefutation 15.81s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 5 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 5 ( 0 equ; 2 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ p1(esk1_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-iowa91df/lgb.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(i_0_2,negated_conjecture,
p1(esk1_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-iowa91df/lgb.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ p1(esk1_0),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
p1(esk1_0),
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : LCL662+1.001 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.11/0.36 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % DateTime : Sat Sep 5 15:02:10 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.46 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 15.81/4.37 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 15.81/4.37 # No SInE strategy applied
% 15.81/4.37 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 15.81/4.37 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___200_C45_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_CO_S0V
% 15.81/4.37 # and selection function PSelectComplexExceptRRHorn.
% 15.81/4.37 #
% 15.81/4.37 # Preprocessing time : 0.012 s
% 15.81/4.37
% 15.81/4.37 # Proof found!
% 15.81/4.37 # SZS status Theorem
% 15.81/4.37 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 15.81/4.37 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 15.81/4.37
% 15.81/4.37 # -------------------------------------------------
% 15.81/4.37 # User time : 0.011 s
% 15.81/4.37 # System time : 0.003 s
% 15.81/4.37 # Total time : 0.014 s
% 15.81/4.37 # Maximum resident set size: 3328 pages
% 15.81/4.37
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------