↑ Up

Etableau---0.67.CSA-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : LCL665+1.001 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 12:01:41 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : CounterSatisfiable 0.15s 0.43s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL665+1.001 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Sat Sep  5 03:06:59 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.40  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.40  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.15/0.40  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.15/0.40  #
% 0.15/0.40  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.40  # Number of axioms: 37 Number of unprocessed: 37
% 0.15/0.40  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.15/0.40  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.15/0.40  # Hello from C++
% 0.15/0.41  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.15/0.41  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.15/0.41  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.15/0.41  # 37 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.15/0.41  # Creating start rules for all 36 conjectures.
% 0.15/0.41  # There are 36 start rule candidates:
% 0.15/0.41  # Found 9 unit axioms.
% 0.15/0.41  # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.15/0.41  # 36 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.15/0.41  # 28 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.15/0.41  # 9 unit axiom clauses
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.15/0.43  # 1475580 Satisfiable branch
% 0.15/0.43  # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.15/0.43  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.15/0.43  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.15/0.43  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.15/0.43  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.15/0.43  # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.15/0.43  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.15/0.43  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.15/0.43  # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.15/0.43  # SZS status CounterSatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.43  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.43  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.15/0.43  
% 0.15/0.43  # End clausification derivation
% 0.15/0.43  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_9, negated_conjecture, (r1(esk1_0,esk14_0))).
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_7, negated_conjecture, (r1(esk1_0,esk15_0))).
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_5, negated_conjecture, (r1(esk1_0,esk16_0))).
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_1, plain, (r1(X1,X1))).
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_3, negated_conjecture, (r1(esk1_0,esk17_0))).
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_8, negated_conjecture, (~p15(esk14_0))).
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_6, negated_conjecture, (~p13(esk15_0))).
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_2, negated_conjecture, (~p11(esk17_0))).
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_4, negated_conjecture, (~p12(esk16_0))).
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_32, negated_conjecture, (p16(X1)|~p26(esk2_1(X1))|~r1(esk1_0,X1))).
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_28, negated_conjecture, (p16(X1)|~p24(esk4_1(X1))|~r1(esk1_0,X1))).
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_24, negated_conjecture, (p16(X1)|~p22(esk6_1(X1))|~r1(esk1_0,X1))).
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_30, negated_conjecture, (p14(X1)|~p26(esk3_1(X1))|~r1(esk1_0,X1))).
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_26, negated_conjecture, (p14(X1)|~p24(esk5_1(X1))|~r1(esk1_0,X1))).
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_22, negated_conjecture, (p14(X1)|~p22(esk7_1(X1))|~r1(esk1_0,X1))).
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_20, negated_conjecture, (p15(X1)|~p23(esk8_1(X1))|~r1(esk1_0,X1))).
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_18, negated_conjecture, (p15(X1)|~p21(esk9_1(X1))|~r1(esk1_0,X1))).
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_16, negated_conjecture, (p13(X1)|~p23(esk10_1(X1))|~r1(esk1_0,X1))).
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_14, negated_conjecture, (p13(X1)|~p21(esk11_1(X1))|~r1(esk1_0,X1))).
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_12, negated_conjecture, (p11(X1)|~p23(esk12_1(X1))|~r1(esk1_0,X1))).
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_10, negated_conjecture, (p11(X1)|~p21(esk13_1(X1))|~r1(esk1_0,X1))).
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_37, negated_conjecture, (p26(X1)|~r1(esk1_0,X2)|~r1(X2,X1))).
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_33, negated_conjecture, (p16(X1)|r1(X1,esk2_1(X1))|~r1(esk1_0,X1))).
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_36, negated_conjecture, (p25(X1)|~r1(esk1_0,X2)|~r1(X2,X1))).
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_35, negated_conjecture, (p24(X1)|~r1(esk1_0,X2)|~r1(X2,X1))).
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_34, negated_conjecture, (p22(X1)|~r1(esk1_0,X2)|~r1(X2,X1))).
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_29, negated_conjecture, (p16(X1)|r1(X1,esk4_1(X1))|~r1(esk1_0,X1))).
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_25, negated_conjecture, (p16(X1)|r1(X1,esk6_1(X1))|~r1(esk1_0,X1))).
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_31, negated_conjecture, (p14(X1)|r1(X1,esk3_1(X1))|~r1(esk1_0,X1))).
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_27, negated_conjecture, (p14(X1)|r1(X1,esk5_1(X1))|~r1(esk1_0,X1))).
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_23, negated_conjecture, (p14(X1)|r1(X1,esk7_1(X1))|~r1(esk1_0,X1))).
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_21, negated_conjecture, (p15(X1)|r1(X1,esk8_1(X1))|~r1(esk1_0,X1))).
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_19, negated_conjecture, (p15(X1)|r1(X1,esk9_1(X1))|~r1(esk1_0,X1))).
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_17, negated_conjecture, (p13(X1)|r1(X1,esk10_1(X1))|~r1(esk1_0,X1))).
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_15, negated_conjecture, (p13(X1)|r1(X1,esk11_1(X1))|~r1(esk1_0,X1))).
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_13, negated_conjecture, (p11(X1)|r1(X1,esk12_1(X1))|~r1(esk1_0,X1))).
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_11, negated_conjecture, (p11(X1)|r1(X1,esk13_1(X1))|~r1(esk1_0,X1))).
% 0.15/0.43  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.15/0.43  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.15/0.43  # Found 5 steps
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_5, negated_conjecture, (r1(esk1_0,esk16_0)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_1425, plain, (~r1(esk16_0,esk7_1(esk1_0))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_0])).
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_127, plain, (r1(esk1_0,esk16_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_34])).
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_1423, plain, (p22(esk7_1(esk1_0))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_22])).
% 0.15/0.43  cnf(i_0_1542, plain, (~r1(esk1_0,esk1_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_1])).
% 0.15/0.43  # End printing tableau
% 0.15/0.43  # SZS output end
% 0.15/0.43  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.15/0.43  # Child (1475580) has found a proof.
% 0.15/0.43  
% 0.15/0.43  # Proof search is over...
% 0.15/0.43  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------