%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Nitpick---2016 % Problem : LCL665+1.001 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v4.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % Computer : n029.star.cs.uiowa.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz % Memory : 32218.75MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Tue Jan 17 19:33:36 EST 2017 % Result : CounterSatisfiable 25.09s % Output : FiniteModel 25.09s % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.03 % Problem : LCL665+1.001 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v4.0.0. % 0.00/0.04 % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % 0.02/0.23 % Computer : n029.star.cs.uiowa.edu % 0.02/0.23 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.02/0.23 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz % 0.02/0.23 % Memory : 32218.75MB % 0.02/0.23 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % 0.02/0.23 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.02/0.23 % DateTime : Sat Jan 14 14:30:03 CST 2017 % 0.02/0.24 % CPUTime : % 25.09/9.90 Nitpicking formula... % 25.09/9.90 Timestamp: 14:30:11 % 25.09/9.90 The type TPTP_Interpret.ind passed the monotonicity test; Nitpick might be % 25.09/9.90 able to skip some scopes % 25.09/9.90 Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured: % 25.09/9.90 "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light" % 25.09/9.90 Batch 1 of 20: Trying 5 scopes: % 25.09/9.90 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1 % 25.09/9.90 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2 % 25.09/9.90 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 3 % 25.09/9.90 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 4 % 25.09/9.90 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 5 % 25.09/9.90 % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel % 25.09/9.90 Nitpick found a counterexample for card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1: % 25.09/9.90 % 25.09/9.90 Skolem constants: % 25.09/9.90 X = i1 % 25.09/9.90 \<lambda>Y. X = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1) % 25.09/9.90 \<lambda>Y. X = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1) % 25.09/9.90 \<lambda>Y. X = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1) % 25.09/9.90 \<lambda>Y. X = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1) % 25.09/9.90 \<lambda>Y. X = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1) % 25.09/9.90 \<lambda>Y. X = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1) % 25.09/9.90 \<lambda>Y. X = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1) % 25.09/9.90 \<lambda>Y. X = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1) % 25.09/9.90 \<lambda>Y. X = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1) % 25.09/9.90 \<lambda>Y. X = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1) % 25.09/9.90 \<lambda>Y. X = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1) % 25.09/9.90 \<lambda>Y. X = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1) % 25.09/9.90 Y = i1 % 25.09/9.90 Y = i1 % 25.09/9.90 Y = i1 % 25.09/9.90 Y = i1 % 25.09/9.90 Constants: % 25.09/9.90 bnd_p11 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False) % 25.09/9.90 bnd_p12 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False) % 25.09/9.90 bnd_p13 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False) % 25.09/9.90 bnd_p14 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True) % 25.09/9.90 bnd_p15 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False) % 25.09/9.90 bnd_p16 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True) % 25.09/9.90 bnd_p21 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False) % 25.09/9.90 bnd_p22 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True) % 25.09/9.90 bnd_p23 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False) % 25.09/9.90 bnd_p24 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True) % 25.09/9.90 bnd_p25 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True) % 25.09/9.90 bnd_p26 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True) % 25.09/9.90 bnd_r1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True)) % 25.09/9.90 % SZS output end FiniteModel % 25.09/9.90 Total time: 1.0 s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------