%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Nitpick---2016 % Problem : LCL669+1.001 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v4.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % Computer : n089.star.cs.uiowa.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz % Memory : 32218.75MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Tue Jan 17 19:33:39 EST 2017 % Result : CounterSatisfiable 25.50s % Output : FiniteModel 25.50s % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.03 % Problem : LCL669+1.001 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v4.0.0. % 0.00/0.04 % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % 0.03/0.23 % Computer : n089.star.cs.uiowa.edu % 0.03/0.23 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.03/0.23 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz % 0.03/0.23 % Memory : 32218.75MB % 0.03/0.23 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % 0.03/0.23 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.03/0.23 % DateTime : Sat Jan 14 14:33:04 CST 2017 % 0.03/0.23 % CPUTime : % 25.50/11.85 Nitpicking formula... % 25.50/11.85 Timestamp: 14:33:12 % 25.50/11.85 The type TPTP_Interpret.ind passed the monotonicity test; Nitpick might be % 25.50/11.85 able to skip some scopes % 25.50/11.85 Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured: % 25.50/11.85 "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light" % 25.50/11.85 Batch 1 of 20: Trying 5 scopes: % 25.50/11.85 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1 % 25.50/11.85 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2 % 25.50/11.85 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 3 % 25.50/11.85 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 4 % 25.50/11.85 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 5 % 25.50/11.85 % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel % 25.50/11.85 Nitpick found a counterexample for card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2: % 25.50/11.85 % 25.50/11.85 Skolem constants: % 25.50/11.85 X = i1 % 25.50/11.85 X = i1 % 25.50/11.85 X = i2 % 25.50/11.85 \<lambda>Y. X = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i1) % 25.50/11.85 \<lambda>Y X Ya. X = % 25.50/11.85 (\<lambda>x. _) % 25.50/11.85 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _) % 25.50/11.85 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i1), % 25.50/11.85 i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i1)), % 25.50/11.85 i2 := (\<lambda>x. _) % 25.50/11.85 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i1), % 25.50/11.85 i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i1))) % 25.50/11.85 X = i1 % 25.50/11.85 X = i1 % 25.50/11.85 Y = i1 % 25.50/11.85 Y = i1 % 25.50/11.85 Y = i1 % 25.50/11.85 Y = i2 % 25.50/11.85 \<lambda>Y X. Y = % 25.50/11.85 (\<lambda>x. _) % 25.50/11.85 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i2, i2 := i2), % 25.50/11.85 i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i2, i2 := i2)) % 25.50/11.85 Y = i1 % 25.50/11.85 Y = i1 % 25.50/11.85 Y = i2 % 25.50/11.85 Constants: % 25.50/11.85 bnd_p1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := True) % 25.50/11.85 bnd_p10 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := False) % 25.50/11.85 bnd_p2 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := False) % 25.50/11.85 bnd_p3 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := True) % 25.50/11.85 bnd_p4 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := False) % 25.50/11.85 bnd_p5 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False) % 25.50/11.85 bnd_p6 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False) % 25.50/11.85 bnd_p8 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False) % 25.50/11.85 bnd_r1 = % 25.50/11.85 (\<lambda>x. _) % 25.50/11.85 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := True), % 25.50/11.85 i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := True)) % 25.50/11.85 % SZS output end FiniteModel % 25.50/11.85 Total time: 3.1 s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------