↑ Up

Nitpick---2016.CSA-FMo.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Nitpick---2016
% Problem  : LCL669+1.005 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s

% Computer : n050.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory   : 32218.75MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Jan 17 19:33:39 EST 2017

% Result   : CounterSatisfiable 82.62s
% Output   : FiniteModel 82.62s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL669+1.005 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s
% 0.03/0.23  % Computer : n050.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.03/0.23  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.23  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.03/0.23  % Memory   : 32218.75MB
% 0.03/0.23  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% 0.03/0.23  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.23  % DateTime : Sat Jan 14 14:33:18 CST 2017
% 0.03/0.23  % CPUTime  : 
% 82.62/64.86  Nitpicking formula...
% 82.62/64.86  Timestamp: 14:33:28
% 82.62/64.86  Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured:
% 82.62/64.86  "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light"
% 82.62/64.86  Batch 1 of 20: Trying 5 scopes:
% 82.62/64.86    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1
% 82.62/64.86    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2
% 82.62/64.86    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 3
% 82.62/64.86    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 4
% 82.62/64.86    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 5
% 82.62/64.86  % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel
% 82.62/64.86  Nitpick found a counterexample for card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2:
% 82.62/64.86  
% 82.62/64.86    Skolem constants:
% 82.62/64.86      X = i1
% 82.62/64.86      X = i1
% 82.62/64.86      X = i1
% 82.62/64.86      X = i1
% 82.62/64.86      X = i1
% 82.62/64.86      X = i1
% 82.62/64.86      X = i1
% 82.62/64.86      X = i1
% 82.62/64.86      X = i2
% 82.62/64.86      \<lambda>Y. X = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i1)
% 82.62/64.86      \<lambda>Y X Ya. X =
% 82.62/64.86        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 82.62/64.86        (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)
% 82.62/64.86           (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i1),
% 82.62/64.86            i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i1)),
% 82.62/64.86         i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)
% 82.62/64.86           (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i1),
% 82.62/64.86            i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i1)))
% 82.62/64.86      X = i1
% 82.62/64.86      X = i1
% 82.62/64.86      X = i1
% 82.62/64.87      X = i1
% 82.62/64.87      X = i1
% 82.62/64.87      X = i1
% 82.62/64.87      X = i1
% 82.62/64.87      X = i1
% 82.62/64.87      Y = i1
% 82.62/64.87      Y = i1
% 82.62/64.87      Y = i1
% 82.62/64.87      Y = i1
% 82.62/64.87      Y = i1
% 82.62/64.87      Y = i1
% 82.62/64.87      Y = i1
% 82.62/64.87      Y = i1
% 82.62/64.87      Y = i1
% 82.62/64.87      Y = i2
% 82.62/64.87      \<lambda>Y X. Y =
% 82.62/64.87        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 82.62/64.87        (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i2, i2 := i2),
% 82.62/64.87         i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i2, i2 := i2))
% 82.62/64.87      Y = i1
% 82.62/64.87      Y = i1
% 82.62/64.87      Y = i1
% 82.62/64.87      Y = i1
% 82.62/64.87      Y = i1
% 82.62/64.87      Y = i1
% 82.62/64.87      Y = i1
% 82.62/64.87      Y = i1
% 82.62/64.87      Y = i2
% 82.62/64.87    Constants:
% 82.62/64.87      bnd_p1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := True)
% 82.62/64.87      bnd_p10 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := False)
% 82.62/64.87      bnd_p11 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := True)
% 82.62/64.87      bnd_p12 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := False)
% 82.62/64.87      bnd_p13 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := True)
% 82.62/64.87      bnd_p14 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := False)
% 82.62/64.87      bnd_p15 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := True)
% 82.62/64.87      bnd_p16 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := False)
% 82.62/64.87      bnd_p17 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False)
% 82.62/64.87      bnd_p18 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False)
% 82.62/64.87      bnd_p2 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := False)
% 82.62/64.87      bnd_p20 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False)
% 82.62/64.87      bnd_p22 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False)
% 82.62/64.87      bnd_p24 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False)
% 82.62/64.87      bnd_p26 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False)
% 82.62/64.87      bnd_p28 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False)
% 82.62/64.87      bnd_p3 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := True)
% 82.62/64.87      bnd_p30 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False)
% 82.62/64.87      bnd_p32 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False)
% 82.62/64.87      bnd_p34 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := False)
% 82.62/64.87      bnd_p4 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := False)
% 82.62/64.87      bnd_p5 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := True)
% 82.62/64.87      bnd_p6 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := False)
% 82.62/64.87      bnd_p7 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := True)
% 82.62/64.87      bnd_p8 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := False)
% 82.62/64.87      bnd_p9 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := True)
% 82.62/64.87      bnd_r1 =
% 82.62/64.87        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 82.62/64.87        (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := True),
% 82.62/64.87         i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := True))
% 82.62/64.87  % SZS output end FiniteModel
% 82.62/64.87  Total time: 54.1 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------