↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : LCL674+1.010 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 01:08:08 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.05s 2.36s
% Output   : Refutation 2.05s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL674+1.010 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.10/0.35  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Sep  5 21:13:56 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.05/2.36  
% 2.05/2.36  SPASS V 3.9 
% 2.05/2.36  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 2.05/2.36  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.05/2.36  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 2.05/2.36  SPASS derived 1744 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 1655 clauses.
% 2.05/2.36  SPASS allocated 100762 KBytes.
% 2.05/2.36  SPASS spent	0:00:01.98 on the problem.
% 2.05/2.36  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 2.05/2.36  		0:00:00.04 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 2.05/2.36  		0:00:00.03 for inferences.
% 2.05/2.36  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 2.05/2.36  		0:00:01.80 for the reduction.
% 2.05/2.36  
% 2.05/2.36  
% 2.05/2.36  Here is a proof with depth 8, length 37 :
% 2.05/2.36  % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.05/2.36  1[0:Inp] ||  -> p100(skc1)*.
% 2.05/2.36  2[0:Inp] || p101(skc1)* -> .
% 2.05/2.36  3[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(u,u)*.
% 2.05/2.36  5[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(u,skf38(u))*r.
% 2.05/2.36  7[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(u,skf36(u))*r.
% 2.05/2.36  9[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(u,skf34(u))*r.
% 2.05/2.36  11[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(u,skf32(u))*r.
% 2.05/2.36  24[0:Inp] || r1(skc1,u) -> p5(u)*.
% 2.05/2.36  34[0:Inp] p102(u) || r1(skc1,u) -> p101(u)*.
% 2.05/2.36  36[0:Inp] || r1(u,v)* r1(v,w)* -> r1(u,w)*.
% 2.05/2.36  58[0:Inp] p102(u) || r1(skc1,u) -> p103(u) p103(skf34(u))*.
% 2.05/2.36  61[0:Inp] p101(u) || r1(skc1,u) -> p102(u) p102(skf36(u))*.
% 2.05/2.36  64[0:Inp] p100(u) || r1(skc1,u) -> p101(u) p101(skf38(u))*.
% 2.05/2.36  85[0:Inp] p103(u) || p5(skf32(u))* r1(skc1,u) -> p104(u).
% 2.05/2.36  89[0:Inp] p102(u) || p104(skf34(u))* r1(skc1,u) -> p103(u).
% 2.05/2.36  92[0:Inp] p101(u) || p103(skf36(u))* r1(skc1,u) -> p102(u).
% 2.05/2.36  95[0:Inp] p100(u) || p102(skf38(u))* r1(skc1,u) -> p101(u).
% 2.05/2.36  243[0:Res:34.2,2.0] p102(skc1) || r1(skc1,skc1)* -> .
% 2.05/2.36  244[0:MRR:243.1,3.0] p102(skc1) ||  -> .
% 2.05/2.36  263[0:Res:24.1,85.1] p103(u) || r1(skc1,skf32(u))*r r1(skc1,u) -> p104(u).
% 2.05/2.36  2439[0:NCh:36.2,36.1,263.1,11.0] p103(u) || r1(skc1,u) r1(skc1,u) -> p104(u)*.
% 2.05/2.36  2440[0:Obv:2439.1] p103(u) || r1(skc1,u) -> p104(u)*.
% 2.05/2.36  2463[0:Res:2440.2,89.1] p103(skf34(u)) p102(u) || r1(skc1,skf34(u))*r r1(skc1,u) -> p103(u).
% 2.05/2.36  2464[0:MRR:2463.0,58.3] p102(u) || r1(skc1,skf34(u))*r r1(skc1,u) -> p103(u).
% 2.05/2.36  2467[0:NCh:36.2,36.1,2464.1,9.0] p102(u) || r1(skc1,u) r1(skc1,u) -> p103(u)*.
% 2.05/2.36  2468[0:Obv:2467.1] p102(u) || r1(skc1,u) -> p103(u)*.
% 2.05/2.36  2531[0:Res:2468.2,92.1] p102(skf36(u)) p101(u) || r1(skc1,skf36(u))*r r1(skc1,u) -> p102(u).
% 2.05/2.36  2532[0:MRR:2531.0,61.3] p101(u) || r1(skc1,skf36(u))*r r1(skc1,u) -> p102(u).
% 2.05/2.36  2598[0:Res:7.0,2532.1] p101(skc1) || r1(skc1,skc1) -> p102(skc1)*.
% 2.05/2.36  2599[0:NCh:36.2,36.1,2532.1,7.0] p101(u) || r1(skc1,u) r1(skc1,u) -> p102(u)*.
% 2.05/2.36  2600[0:MRR:2598.1,2598.2,3.0,244.0] p101(skc1) ||  -> .
% 2.05/2.36  2601[0:Obv:2599.1] p101(u) || r1(skc1,u) -> p102(u)*.
% 2.05/2.36  2665[0:Res:2601.2,95.1] p101(skf38(u)) p100(u) || r1(skc1,skf38(u))*r r1(skc1,u) -> p101(u).
% 2.05/2.36  2666[0:MRR:2665.0,64.3] p100(u) || r1(skc1,skf38(u))*r r1(skc1,u) -> p101(u).
% 2.05/2.36  2728[0:Res:5.0,2666.1] p100(skc1) || r1(skc1,skc1) -> p101(skc1)*.
% 2.05/2.36  2730[0:SSi:2728.0,1.0] || r1(skc1,skc1) -> p101(skc1)*.
% 2.05/2.36  2731[0:MRR:2730.0,2730.1,3.0,2600.0] ||  -> .
% 2.05/2.36  % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.05/2.36  Formulae used in the proof : main reflexivity transitivity
% 2.05/2.36  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------