↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : LCL674+1.015 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 01:08:08 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 8.35s 8.69s
% Output   : Refutation 8.35s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : LCL674+1.015 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.03/0.29  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.03/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.03/0.29  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.03/0.29  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.03/0.30  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.30  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.03/0.30  % DateTime : Sat Sep  5 21:29:57 UTC 2026
% 0.03/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 8.35/8.69  
% 8.35/8.69  SPASS V 3.9 
% 8.35/8.69  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 8.35/8.69  % SZS status Theorem
% 8.35/8.69  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 8.35/8.69  SPASS derived 3851 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 3713 clauses.
% 8.35/8.69  SPASS allocated 104605 KBytes.
% 8.35/8.69  SPASS spent	0:00:08.29 on the problem.
% 8.35/8.69  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 8.35/8.69  		0:00:00.04 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 8.35/8.69  		0:00:00.06 for inferences.
% 8.35/8.69  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 8.35/8.69  		0:00:07.82 for the reduction.
% 8.35/8.69  
% 8.35/8.69  
% 8.35/8.69  Here is a proof with depth 12, length 51 :
% 8.35/8.69  % SZS output start Refutation
% 8.35/8.69  1[0:Inp] ||  -> p100(skc1)*.
% 8.35/8.69  2[0:Inp] || p101(skc1)* -> .
% 8.35/8.69  3[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(u,u)*.
% 8.35/8.69  5[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(u,skf58(u))*r.
% 8.35/8.69  7[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(u,skf56(u))*r.
% 8.35/8.69  9[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(u,skf54(u))*r.
% 8.35/8.69  11[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(u,skf52(u))*r.
% 8.35/8.69  13[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(u,skf50(u))*r.
% 8.35/8.69  15[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(u,skf48(u))*r.
% 8.35/8.69  34[0:Inp] || r1(skc1,u) -> p7(u)*.
% 8.35/8.69  49[0:Inp] p102(u) || r1(skc1,u) -> p101(u)*.
% 8.35/8.69  51[0:Inp] || r1(u,v)* r1(v,w)* -> r1(u,w)*.
% 8.35/8.69  82[0:Inp] p104(u) || r1(skc1,u) -> p105(u) p105(skf50(u))*.
% 8.35/8.69  85[0:Inp] p103(u) || r1(skc1,u) -> p104(u) p104(skf52(u))*.
% 8.35/8.69  88[0:Inp] p102(u) || r1(skc1,u) -> p103(u) p103(skf54(u))*.
% 8.35/8.69  91[0:Inp] p101(u) || r1(skc1,u) -> p102(u) p102(skf56(u))*.
% 8.35/8.69  94[0:Inp] p100(u) || r1(skc1,u) -> p101(u) p101(skf58(u))*.
% 8.35/8.69  124[0:Inp] p105(u) || p7(skf48(u))* r1(skc1,u) -> p106(u).
% 8.35/8.69  128[0:Inp] p104(u) || p106(skf50(u))* r1(skc1,u) -> p105(u).
% 8.35/8.69  131[0:Inp] p103(u) || p105(skf52(u))* r1(skc1,u) -> p104(u).
% 8.35/8.69  134[0:Inp] p102(u) || p104(skf54(u))* r1(skc1,u) -> p103(u).
% 8.35/8.69  137[0:Inp] p101(u) || p103(skf56(u))* r1(skc1,u) -> p102(u).
% 8.35/8.69  140[0:Inp] p100(u) || p102(skf58(u))* r1(skc1,u) -> p101(u).
% 8.35/8.69  358[0:Res:49.2,2.0] p102(skc1) || r1(skc1,skc1)* -> .
% 8.35/8.69  359[0:MRR:358.1,3.0] p102(skc1) ||  -> .
% 8.35/8.69  388[0:Res:34.1,124.1] p105(u) || r1(skc1,skf48(u))*r r1(skc1,u) -> p106(u).
% 8.35/8.69  5154[0:NCh:51.2,51.1,388.1,15.0] p105(u) || r1(skc1,u) r1(skc1,u) -> p106(u)*.
% 8.35/8.69  5155[0:Obv:5154.1] p105(u) || r1(skc1,u) -> p106(u)*.
% 8.35/8.69  5188[0:Res:5155.2,128.1] p105(skf50(u)) p104(u) || r1(skc1,skf50(u))*r r1(skc1,u) -> p105(u).
% 8.35/8.69  5189[0:MRR:5188.0,82.3] p104(u) || r1(skc1,skf50(u))*r r1(skc1,u) -> p105(u).
% 8.35/8.69  5192[0:NCh:51.2,51.1,5189.1,13.0] p104(u) || r1(skc1,u) r1(skc1,u) -> p105(u)*.
% 8.35/8.69  5193[0:Obv:5192.1] p104(u) || r1(skc1,u) -> p105(u)*.
% 8.35/8.69  5286[0:Res:5193.2,131.1] p104(skf52(u)) p103(u) || r1(skc1,skf52(u))*r r1(skc1,u) -> p104(u).
% 8.35/8.69  5287[0:MRR:5286.0,85.3] p103(u) || r1(skc1,skf52(u))*r r1(skc1,u) -> p104(u).
% 8.35/8.69  5382[0:NCh:51.2,51.1,5287.1,11.0] p103(u) || r1(skc1,u) r1(skc1,u) -> p104(u)*.
% 8.35/8.69  5383[0:Obv:5382.1] p103(u) || r1(skc1,u) -> p104(u)*.
% 8.35/8.69  5476[0:Res:5383.2,134.1] p103(skf54(u)) p102(u) || r1(skc1,skf54(u))*r r1(skc1,u) -> p103(u).
% 8.35/8.69  5477[0:MRR:5476.0,88.3] p102(u) || r1(skc1,skf54(u))*r r1(skc1,u) -> p103(u).
% 8.35/8.69  5570[0:NCh:51.2,51.1,5477.1,9.0] p102(u) || r1(skc1,u) r1(skc1,u) -> p103(u)*.
% 8.35/8.69  5571[0:Obv:5570.1] p102(u) || r1(skc1,u) -> p103(u)*.
% 8.35/8.69  5665[0:Res:5571.2,137.1] p102(skf56(u)) p101(u) || r1(skc1,skf56(u))*r r1(skc1,u) -> p102(u).
% 8.35/8.69  5666[0:MRR:5665.0,91.3] p101(u) || r1(skc1,skf56(u))*r r1(skc1,u) -> p102(u).
% 8.35/8.69  5763[0:Res:7.0,5666.1] p101(skc1) || r1(skc1,skc1) -> p102(skc1)*.
% 8.35/8.69  5764[0:NCh:51.2,51.1,5666.1,7.0] p101(u) || r1(skc1,u) r1(skc1,u) -> p102(u)*.
% 8.35/8.69  5765[0:MRR:5763.1,5763.2,3.0,359.0] p101(skc1) ||  -> .
% 8.35/8.69  5766[0:Obv:5764.1] p101(u) || r1(skc1,u) -> p102(u)*.
% 8.35/8.69  5860[0:Res:5766.2,140.1] p101(skf58(u)) p100(u) || r1(skc1,skf58(u))*r r1(skc1,u) -> p101(u).
% 8.35/8.69  5861[0:MRR:5860.0,94.3] p100(u) || r1(skc1,skf58(u))*r r1(skc1,u) -> p101(u).
% 8.35/8.69  5953[0:Res:5.0,5861.1] p100(skc1) || r1(skc1,skc1) -> p101(skc1)*.
% 8.35/8.69  5955[0:SSi:5953.0,1.0] || r1(skc1,skc1) -> p101(skc1)*.
% 8.35/8.69  5956[0:MRR:5955.0,5955.1,3.0,5765.0] ||  -> .
% 8.35/8.69  % SZS output end Refutation
% 8.35/8.69  Formulae used in the proof : main reflexivity transitivity
% 8.35/8.69  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------