↑ Up

ConnectPP---0.7.2.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ConnectPP---0.7.2
% Problem  : LCL678+1.001 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 08:49:50 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.04s 0.32s
% Output   : Proof 0.04s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(reflexivity,axiom,
    ! [X] : r1(X,X),
    file('theBenchmark.p',reflexivity) ).

fof(transitivity,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( ( r1(Y,Z)
        & r1(X,Y) )
     => r1(X,Z) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',transitivity) ).

fof(main,conjecture,
    ~ ? [X] :
        ~ ( ~ ! [Y] :
                ( ~ ! [X] :
                      ( ~ ! [Y] :
                            ( p1(Y)
                            | ~ r1(X,Y) )
                      | ! [Y] :
                          ( p1(Y)
                          | ~ r1(X,Y) )
                      | ~ r1(Y,X) )
                | $false
                | ~ r1(X,Y) )
          | $false ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',main) ).

fof(f_1_1,plain,
    ! [X] : r1(X,X),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[reflexivity]) ).

fof(f_1_2,plain,
    ! [U_0] : r1(U_0,U_0),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_1_1]) ).

cnf(f_1_3,plain,
    r1(U_0,U_0),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_1_2]) ).

fof(f_2_1,plain,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( r1(X,Z)
      | ~ r1(Y,Z)
      | ~ r1(X,Y) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[transitivity]) ).

fof(f_2_2,plain,
    ! [U_3,U_2,U_1] :
      ( r1(U_3,U_1)
      | ~ r1(U_2,U_1)
      | ~ r1(U_3,U_2) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_2_1]) ).

cnf(f_2_3,plain,
    ( r1(U_3,U_1)
    | ~ r1(U_2,U_1)
    | ~ r1(U_3,U_2) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_2_2]) ).

fof(f_3_1,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X] :
      ~ ( ~ ! [Y] :
              ( ~ ! [X] :
                    ( ~ ! [Y] :
                          ( p1(Y)
                          | ~ r1(X,Y) )
                    | ! [Y] :
                        ( p1(Y)
                        | ~ r1(X,Y) )
                    | ~ r1(Y,X) )
              | $false
              | ~ r1(X,Y) )
        | $false ),
    inference(negate,[status(cth)],[main]) ).

fof(f_3_2,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X] :
      ( ! [Y] :
          ( ? [X] :
              ( ! [Y] :
                  ( p1(Y)
                  | ~ r1(X,Y) )
              & ? [Y] :
                  ( ~ p1(Y)
                  & r1(X,Y) )
              & r1(Y,X) )
          | $false
          | ~ r1(X,Y) )
      & ~ $false ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[f_3_1]) ).

fof(f_3_3,negated_conjecture,
    ? [U_8] :
      ( ! [U_7] :
          ( ? [U_6] :
              ( ! [U_5] :
                  ( p1(U_5)
                  | ~ r1(U_6,U_5) )
              & ? [U_4] :
                  ( ~ p1(U_4)
                  & r1(U_6,U_4) )
              & r1(U_7,U_6) )
          | $false
          | ~ r1(U_8,U_7) )
      & ~ $false ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_3_2]) ).

fof(f_3_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ? [U_8] :
        ! [U_7] :
          ( ? [U_6] :
              ( ! [U_5] :
                  ( p1(U_5)
                  | ~ r1(U_6,U_5) )
              & ? [U_4] :
                  ( ~ p1(U_4)
                  & r1(U_6,U_4) )
              & r1(U_7,U_6) )
          | ~ r1(U_8,U_7) )
      | $false )
    & ~ $false ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[f_3_3]) ).

fof(f_3_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ! [U_7] :
          ( ? [U_6] :
              ( ! [U_5] :
                  ( p1(U_5)
                  | ~ r1(U_6,U_5) )
              & ? [U_4] :
                  ( ~ p1(U_4)
                  & r1(U_6,U_4) )
              & r1(U_7,U_6) )
          | ~ r1(sK1,U_7) )
      | $false )
    & ~ $false ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1]),skolemize(U_8,sK1)],[f_3_4]) ).

fof(f_3_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ! [U_7] :
          ( ( ! [U_5] :
                ( p1(U_5)
                | ~ r1(sK2(U_7),U_5) )
            & ? [U_4] :
                ( ~ p1(U_4)
                & r1(sK2(U_7),U_4) )
            & r1(U_7,sK2(U_7)) )
          | ~ r1(sK1,U_7) )
      | $false )
    & ~ $false ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2]),skolemize(U_6,sK2(U_7))],[f_3_5]) ).

fof(f_3_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ! [U_7] :
          ( ( ! [U_5] :
                ( p1(U_5)
                | ~ r1(sK2(U_7),U_5) )
            & ~ p1(sK3(U_7))
            & r1(sK2(U_7),sK3(U_7))
            & r1(U_7,sK2(U_7)) )
          | ~ r1(sK1,U_7) )
      | $false )
    & ~ $false ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK3]),skolemize(U_4,sK3(U_7))],[f_3_6]) ).

fof(f_3_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( ! [U_5,U_7] :
        ( p1(U_5)
        | ~ r1(sK2(U_7),U_5)
        | ~ sP0(U_5,U_7) )
    & ! [U_5,U_7] :
        ( ~ p1(sK3(U_7))
        | ~ sP0(U_5,U_7) )
    & ! [U_5,U_7] :
        ( r1(sK2(U_7),sK3(U_7))
        | ~ sP0(U_5,U_7) )
    & ! [U_5,U_7] :
        ( r1(U_7,sK2(U_7))
        | ~ sP0(U_5,U_7) )
    & ! [U_5,U_7] :
        ( sP0(U_5,U_7)
        | ~ r1(sK1,U_7)
        | $false )
    & ~ $false ),
    inference(definitional_conversion,[status(esa),new_symbols(definitional,[sP0])],[f_3_7]) ).

cnf(f_3_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ $false,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_3_8]) ).

cnf(f_3_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( sP0(U_5,U_7)
    | ~ r1(sK1,U_7)
    | $false ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_3_8]) ).

cnf(f_3_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( r1(U_7,sK2(U_7))
    | ~ sP0(U_5,U_7) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_3_8]) ).

cnf(f_3_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( r1(sK2(U_7),sK3(U_7))
    | ~ sP0(U_5,U_7) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_3_8]) ).

cnf(f_3_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p1(sK3(U_7))
    | ~ sP0(U_5,U_7) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_3_8]) ).

cnf(f_3_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( p1(U_5)
    | ~ r1(sK2(U_7),U_5)
    | ~ sP0(U_5,U_7) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_3_8]) ).

cnf(f_3_9_true,negated_conjecture,
    $true,
    inference(clause_is_true,[status(thm)],[f_3_9]) ).

cnf(f_3_10_simplified,negated_conjecture,
    ( sP0(U_5,U_7)
    | ~ r1(sK1,U_7) ),
    inference(simplify_clause,[status(thm)],[f_3_10]) ).

cnf(sat_proved,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cadical,[status(thm)],[]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : LCL678+1.001 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.01  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ problem
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.04/0.30  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.04/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.04/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.04/0.30  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.04/0.30  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.04/0.30  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.04/0.30  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.04/0.30  % DateTime : Sat Sep 19 15:40:52 UTC 2026
% 0.04/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.04/0.32  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.04/0.32  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------