↑ Up

SPASS-SCL---0.1.1.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS-SCL---0.1.1
% Problem  : LCL678+1.001 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/SPASS-SCL-FOL -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 01:10:09 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.36s
% Output   : Proof 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (   7 unt;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   62 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   88 (  46   ~;  35   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   1  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   48 (   6 sgn  29   !;   7   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% FILE RECORD
fof(main,conjecture,
    ~ ? [X1] :
        ~ ( $false
          | ~ ! [X2] :
                ( ~ r1(X1,X2)
                | $false
                | ~ ! [X1] :
                      ( ~ r1(X2,X1)
                      | ! [X2] :
                          ( ~ r1(X1,X2)
                          | p1(X2) )
                      | ~ ! [X2] :
                            ( ~ r1(X1,X2)
                            | p1(X2) ) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',main) ).

% NEGATING CONJECTURE
fof(main_nc,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X1] :
      ~ ( $false
        | ~ ! [X2] :
              ( ~ r1(X1,X2)
              | $false
              | ~ ! [X1] :
                    ( ~ r1(X2,X1)
                    | ! [X2] :
                        ( ~ r1(X1,X2)
                        | p1(X2) )
                    | ~ ! [X2] :
                          ( ~ r1(X1,X2)
                          | p1(X2) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negating_conjecture,[status(cth)],[main]) ).

% FOF SIMPLE INFERENCE
fof(main_nc_elimTB,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X1] :
      ~ ~ ! [X2] :
            ( ~ r1(X1,X2)
            | ~ ! [X3] :
                  ( ~ r1(X2,X3)
                  | ! [X4] :
                      ( ~ r1(X3,X4)
                      | p1(X4) )
                  | ~ ! [X5] :
                        ( ~ r1(X3,X5)
                        | p1(X5) ) ) ),
    inference(elimTB,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[main_nc])]) ).

% FOF INTRODUCE RENAMING
fof(ren1_defn,definition,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( ren1(X2,X3)
     <= ( ~ r1(X2,X3)
        | ! [X4] :
            ( ~ r1(X3,X4)
            | p1(X4) )
        | ~ ! [X5] :
              ( ~ r1(X3,X5)
              | p1(X5) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[ren1])],[main_nc_elimTB]) ).

% FOF SIMPLE INFERENCE
fof(ren1_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( r1(X1,X2)
        & ? [X3] :
            ( r1(X2,X3)
            & ~ p1(X3) )
        & ! [X4] :
            ( ~ r1(X2,X4)
            | p1(X4) ) )
      | ren1(X1,X2) ),
    inference(elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,[status(thm)],[ren1_defn]) ).

% FOF SKOLEM INFERENCE. WIP!!
fof(ren1_skol,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( r1(X1,X2)
        & r1(X2,skf1(X2))
        & ~ p1(skf1(X2))
        & ! [X4] :
            ( ~ r1(X2,X4)
            | p1(X4) ) )
      | ren1(X1,X2) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[skf1]),skolemize(X3,skf1(X2))],[ren1_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope]) ).

% FOF PUSH DISJ SPLITTING.
cnf(c_6,plain,
    ( ~ r1(X0,X1)
    | p1(X1)
    | ren1(X2,X0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[inference(push_disj,[status(thm)],[ren1_skol])]) ).

% FOF PUSH DISJ SPLITTING.
cnf(c_4,plain,
    ( r1(X0,skf1(X0))
    | ren1(X1,X0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[inference(push_disj,[status(thm)],[ren1_skol])]) ).

% FOF PUSH DISJ SPLITTING.
cnf(c_5,plain,
    ( ~ p1(skf1(X0))
    | ren1(X1,X0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[inference(push_disj,[status(thm)],[ren1_skol])]) ).

% CNF SPASS RESOLUTION.
cnf(c_8,plain,
    ren1(X0,X1),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_6,c_4,c_5]) ).

% FOF RENAMING INFERENCE
fof(main_nc_renObv,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X1] :
      ~ ~ ! [X2] :
            ( ~ r1(X1,X2)
            | ~ ! [X3] : ren1(X2,X3) ),
    inference(renaming,[status(esa)],[main_nc_elimTB,ren1_defn]) ).

% FOF SIMPLE INFERENCE
fof(main_nc_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X1] :
    ! [X2] :
      ( ~ r1(X1,X2)
      | ? [X3] : ~ ren1(X2,X3) ),
    inference(elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,[status(thm)],[main_nc_renObv]) ).

% FOF SKOLEM INFERENCE. WIP!!
fof(main_nc_skol,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ~ r1(skc2,X2)
      | ~ ren1(X2,skf3(X2)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[skc2,skf3]),skolemize(X1,skc2),skolemize(X3,skf3(X2))],[main_nc_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope]) ).

% FOF PUSH DISJ SPLITTING.
cnf(c_7,plain,
    ( ~ r1(skc2,X0)
    | ~ ren1(X0,skf3(X0)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[inference(push_disj,[status(thm)],[main_nc_skol])]) ).

% CNF SPASS RESOLUTION.
cnf(c_9,plain,
    ~ r1(skc2,X0),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_8,c_7]) ).

% FILE RECORD
fof(reflexivity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : r1(X1,X1),
    file('theBenchmark.p',reflexivity) ).

% FOF SIMPLE INFERENCE
fof(reflexivity_elimTB,axiom,
    ! [X1] : r1(X1,X1),
    inference(elimTB,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[reflexivity])]) ).

% FOF SIMPLE INFERENCE
fof(reflexivity_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,axiom,
    ! [X1] : r1(X1,X1),
    inference(elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,[status(thm)],[reflexivity_elimTB]) ).

% FOF PUSH DISJ SPLITTING.
cnf(c_1,plain,
    r1(X0,X0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[inference(push_disj,[status(thm)],[reflexivity_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope])]) ).

% CNF SPASS RESOLUTION.
cnf(c_10,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_9,c_1]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL678+1.001 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/SPASS-SCL-FOL -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.36  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Sep  5 23:59:56 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.36  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/SPASS-SCL-FOL -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  % Input Clauses:
% 0.13/0.36  % 1:1:1:INP:Top:  -> r1(x0,x0)
% 0.13/0.36  % 2:3:3:INP:TopTopTop: r1(x0,x1),r1(x1,x2) -> r1(x0,x2)
% 0.13/0.36  % 3:2:2:INP:TopTop:  -> r1(x0,x1),ren1(x0,x1)
% 0.13/0.36  % 4:2:2:INP:TopTop:  -> r1(x0,skf1(x0)),ren1(x1,x0)
% 0.13/0.36  % 5:2:2:INP:TopTop: p1(skf1(x0)) -> ren1(x1,x0)
% 0.13/0.36  % 6:3:3:INP:TopTopTop: r1(x0,x1) -> p1(x1),ren1(x2,x0)
% 0.13/0.36  % 7:2:1:INP:Top: r1(skc2,x0),ren1(x0,skf3(x0)) -> 
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  % Predicates: r1 p1 ren1 
% 0.13/0.36  % Fol Constants: skc2 
% 0.13/0.36  % Fol Functions: skf1 skf3 
% 0.13/0.36  % Problem Properties:
% 0.13/0.36  % This is a full first-order problem without equality. The Problem is non-linear. 
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  % Reduced Input Axiom Clauses:
% 0.13/0.36  % 1:1:1:INP:Top:  -> r1(x0,x0)
% 0.13/0.36  % 2:3:3:INP:TopTopTop: r1(x0,x1),r1(x1,x2) -> r1(x0,x2)
% 0.13/0.36  % 3:2:2:INP:TopTop:  -> r1(x0,x1),ren1(x0,x1)
% 0.13/0.36  % 4:2:2:INP:TopTop:  -> r1(x0,skf1(x0)),ren1(x1,x0)
% 0.13/0.36  % 5:2:2:INP:TopTop: p1(skf1(x0)) -> ren1(x1,x0)
% 0.13/0.36  % 6:3:3:INP:TopTopTop: r1(x0,x1) -> p1(x1),ren1(x2,x0)
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  % Reduced Input Conjecture Clauses:
% 0.13/0.36  % 7:2:1:INP:Top: r1(skc2,x0),ren1(x0,skf3(x0)) -> 
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  % === Starting SPASS-SCL-FOL A Little Less Naive, considering 9 atoms initially. Used heuristic: lmodel_grow ===
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.13/0.36  % Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  % SPASS-SCL-FOL Statistics:
% 0.13/0.36  % Number of learned clauses: 2
% 0.13/0.36  % Number of propagations: 6
% 0.13/0.36  % Number of decisions: 4
% 0.13/0.36  % Number of resolutions: 4
% 0.13/0.36  % Number of condensations: 1
% 0.13/0.36  % Number of sub resolutions: 0
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  % Solver is done. Empty clause found
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.13/0.36  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.36  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  % Needed:       0:00:00.00
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  % ###
% 0.13/0.36  % ### Pagesize: 8192
% 0.13/0.36  % ### Marksize: 0
% 0.13/0.36  % ### Memory demanded:  275 KBytes
% 0.13/0.36  % ### Memory freed:     275 KBytes
% 0.13/0.36  % ### Memory remaining: 0 Bytes
% 0.13/0.36  % ### Pages allocated:  105 Pages
% 0.13/0.36  % ###
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------