%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : E-SAT---3.5.1 % Problem : LCL679+1.001 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM % Computer : n017.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8046.5625MB % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:23:02 PM UTC 2026 % Result : CounterSatisfiable 0.26s 0.57s % Output : Saturation 0.26s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.05 % Problem : LCL679+1.001 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0. % 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM % 0.19/0.44 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu % 0.19/0.44 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.19/0.44 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.19/0.44 % Memory : 8046.5625MB % 0.19/0.44 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic % 0.19/0.44 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.19/0.44 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.19/0.44 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 00:50:27 UTC 2026 % 0.19/0.45 % CPUTime : % 0.19/0.45 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM % 0.26/0.53 Running first-order theorem proving % 0.26/0.53 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.26/0.57 % Version: 3.5.1 % 0.26/0.57 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN. % 0.26/0.57 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total) % 0.26/0.57 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores % 0.26/0.57 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores % 0.26/0.57 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores % 0.26/0.57 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores % 0.26/0.57 % new_bool_3 with pid 1060890 completed with status 1 % 0.26/0.57 % Result found by new_bool_3 % 0.26/0.57 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN. % 0.26/0.57 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total) % 0.26/0.57 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores % 0.26/0.57 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores % 0.26/0.57 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)) % 0.26/0.57 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0) % 0.26/0.57 % Search class: FUUPF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN % 0.26/0.57 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total) % 0.26/0.57 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores % 0.26/0.57 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1060895 completed with status 1 % 0.26/0.57 % Result found by SubtermCWHack % 0.26/0.57 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN. % 0.26/0.57 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total) % 0.26/0.57 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores % 0.26/0.57 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores % 0.26/0.57 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)) % 0.26/0.57 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0) % 0.26/0.57 % Search class: FUUPF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN % 0.26/0.57 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total) % 0.26/0.57 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores % 0.26/0.57 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s % 0.26/0.57 % 0.26/0.57 % No proof found! % 0.26/0.57 % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % 0.26/0.57 % SZS output start Saturation % 0.26/0.57 % SZS output end Saturation % 0.26/0.57 % Parsed axioms : 1 % 0.26/0.57 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % Initial clauses : 1 % 0.26/0.57 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 1 % 0.26/0.57 % Initial clauses in saturation : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % Processed clauses : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % ...of these trivial : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % ...subsumed : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % ...remaining for further processing : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % Backward-subsumed : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % Backward-rewritten : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % Generated clauses : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % Paramodulations : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % Factorizations : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % NegExts : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % Equation resolutions : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % Disequality decompositions : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % Total rewrite steps : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % ...of those cached : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % Propositional unsat checks : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % Propositional check models : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % Propositional clauses : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0 % 0.26/0.57 % Propositional unsat core size : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 % 0.26/0.57 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000 % 0.26/0.57 % Propositional solver time : 0.000 % 0.26/0.57 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 % 0.26/0.57 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 % 0.26/0.57 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000 % 0.26/0.57 % Current number of processed clauses : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 % 0.26/0.57 % Negative unit clauses : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % Non-unit-clauses : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0 % 0.26/0.57 % ...number of literals in the above : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % Current number of archived formulas : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % Current number of archived clauses : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % BW rewrite match successes : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % Condensation attempts : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % Condensation successes : 0 % 0.26/0.57 % Termbank termtop insertions : 47 % 0.26/0.57 % Search garbage collected termcells : 9 % 0.26/0.57 % 0.26/0.57 % ------------------------------------------------- % 0.26/0.57 % User time : 0.005 s % 0.26/0.57 % System time : 0.000 s % 0.26/0.57 % Total time : 0.005 s % 0.26/0.57 % Maximum resident set size: 3624 pages % 0.26/0.57 % 0.26/0.57 % ------------------------------------------------- % 0.26/0.57 % User time : 0.006 s % 0.26/0.57 % System time : 0.007 s % 0.26/0.57 % Total time : 0.014 s % 0.26/0.57 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages % 0.26/0.57 % E exiting %------------------------------------------------------------------------------