%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : LCL680+1.001 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep 7 12:01:46 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.09s 0.39s
% Output : Assurance 0s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : LCL680+1.001 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.09/0.36 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % DateTime : Fri Sep 4 23:00:42 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.39 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.09/0.39 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___107_C48_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.09/0.39 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 0.09/0.39 #
% 0.09/0.39 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.09/0.39
% 0.09/0.39 # Proof found!
% 0.09/0.39 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.09/0.39 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.09/0.39 fof(main, conjecture, ~(?[X1]:~((~(p1(X1))|p1(X1)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', main)).
% 0.09/0.39 fof(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(~(?[X1]:~((~(p1(X1))|p1(X1))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[main])).
% 0.09/0.39 fof(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, (p1(esk1_0)&~p1(esk1_0)), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])).
% 0.09/0.39 cnf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, (~p1(esk1_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
% 0.09/0.39 cnf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, (p1(esk1_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
% 0.09/0.39 cnf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4])]), ['proof']).
% 0.09/0.39 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.09/0.39 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------