↑ Up

Enigma---0.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : LCL682+1.001 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 11:48:19 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 12.51s 3.27s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 12.51s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    9 (   7 unt;   0 nHn;   9 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   13 (   0 equ;   6 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( p12(X1)
    | ~ r1(X2,X1)
    | ~ r1(esk1_0,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-sfiekx7b/input.p',i_0_15) ).

cnf(i_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    r1(esk6_0,esk7_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-sfiekx7b/input.p',i_0_7) ).

cnf(i_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    r1(esk1_0,esk6_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-sfiekx7b/input.p',i_0_8) ).

cnf(i_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p12(esk7_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-sfiekx7b/input.p',i_0_6) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( p12(X1)
    | ~ r1(X2,X1)
    | ~ r1(esk1_0,X2) ),
    i_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    r1(esk6_0,esk7_0),
    i_0_7 ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    r1(esk1_0,esk6_0),
    i_0_8 ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p12(esk7_0),
    i_0_6 ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22])]),c_0_23]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL682+1.001 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.09/0.37  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % DateTime : Fri Sep  4 16:07:21 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.48  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 12.51/3.27  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 12.51/3.27  # No SInE strategy applied
% 12.51/3.27  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 12.51/3.27  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4c
% 12.51/3.27  # and selection function SelectCQPrecWNTNp.
% 12.51/3.27  #
% 12.51/3.27  # Preprocessing time       : 0.023 s
% 12.51/3.27  
% 12.51/3.27  # Proof found!
% 12.51/3.27  # SZS status Theorem
% 12.51/3.27  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 12.51/3.27  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 12.51/3.27  
% 12.51/3.27  # -------------------------------------------------
% 12.51/3.27  # User time                : 0.023 s
% 12.51/3.27  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 12.51/3.27  # Total time               : 0.027 s
% 12.51/3.27  # Maximum resident set size: 3328 pages
% 12.51/3.27  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------