%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : LCL684+1.001 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep 7 11:48:20 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 11.60s 3.51s
% Output : CNFRefutation 11.60s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 8 RR)
% Number of literals : 18 ( 0 equ; 11 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p201(X1)
| ~ p101(X1)
| ~ r1(X2,X1)
| ~ r1(esk1_0,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lxkrtrrw/lgb.p',i_0_5) ).
cnf(i_0_1,plain,
r1(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lxkrtrrw/lgb.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(i_0_3,negated_conjecture,
p101(esk1_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lxkrtrrw/lgb.p',i_0_3) ).
cnf(i_0_4,negated_conjecture,
p201(esk1_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lxkrtrrw/lgb.p',i_0_4) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p201(X1)
| ~ p101(X1)
| ~ r1(X2,X1)
| ~ r1(esk1_0,X2) ),
i_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
r1(X1,X1),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ r1(esk1_0,X1)
| ~ p101(X1)
| ~ p201(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
p101(esk1_0),
i_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
p201(esk1_0),
i_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_11]),c_0_14])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : LCL684+1.001 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.09/0.36 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % DateTime : Sat Sep 5 16:33:07 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.42 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 11.60/3.51 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 11.60/3.51 # No SInE strategy applied
% 11.60/3.51 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 11.60/3.51 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y_ni
% 11.60/3.51 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 11.60/3.51 #
% 11.60/3.51 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 11.60/3.51 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 11.60/3.51
% 11.60/3.51 # Proof found!
% 11.60/3.51 # SZS status Theorem
% 11.60/3.51 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 11.60/3.51 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 11.60/3.51
% 11.60/3.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 11.60/3.51 # User time : 0.024 s
% 11.60/3.51 # System time : 0.002 s
% 11.60/3.51 # Total time : 0.026 s
% 11.60/3.51 # Maximum resident set size: 3328 pages
% 11.60/3.51
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------