↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : LCL684+1.001 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:59:31 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.04s 0.32s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.04s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   45 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   68 (  37   ~;  21   |;  10   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   1 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   19 (   0 sgn  11   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(reflexivity,axiom,
    ! [X] : r1(X,X),
    file('theBenchmark.p',reflexivity) ).

fof(main,conjecture,
    ~ ? [X] :
        ~ ( ~ ( p101(X)
              & p201(X) )
          | ~ ! [Y] :
                ( ! [X] :
                    ( ~ ( p101(X)
                        & p201(X) )
                    | ~ r1(Y,X) )
                | ~ r1(X,Y) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',main) ).

fof(main_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ~ ? [X] :
          ~ ( ~ ( p101(X)
                & p201(X) )
            | ~ ! [Y] :
                  ( ! [X] :
                      ( ~ ( p101(X)
                          & p201(X) )
                      | ~ r1(Y,X) )
                  | ~ r1(X,Y) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[main]) ).

fof(nnf_3,plain,
    ? [X] :
      ( p101(X)
      & p201(X)
      & ! [Y] :
          ( ! [X0] :
              ( ~ p101(X0)
              | ~ p201(X0)
              | ~ r1(Y,X0) )
          | ~ r1(X,Y) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[main_neg]) ).

fof(sk_main_neg_sk,plain,
    ( p101(sK0)
    & p201(sK0)
    & ! [Y] :
        ( ! [X0] :
            ( ~ p101(X0)
            | ~ p201(X0)
            | ~ r1(Y,X0) )
        | ~ r1(sK0,Y) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X,sK0)],[nnf_3]) ).

fof(sk_main_neg,plain,
    ( p101(sK0)
    & p201(sK0)
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( ~ p101(VAR_1)
        | ~ p201(VAR_1)
        | ~ r1(VAR_0,VAR_1)
        | ~ r1(sK0,VAR_0) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_main_neg_sk]) ).

cnf(c_4,negated_conjecture,
    p201(sK0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_main_neg]) ).

cnf(c_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p101(B)
    | ~ p201(B)
    | ~ r1(A,B)
    | ~ r1(sK0,A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_main_neg]) ).

cnf(c_6,negated_conjecture,
    p101(sK0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_main_neg]) ).

cnf(c_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p101(sK0)
    | ~ r1(A,sK0)
    | ~ r1(sK0,A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_5]) ).

cnf(c_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ r1(A,sK0)
    | ~ r1(sK0,A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_6,c_7]) ).

cnf(c_9,plain,
    r1(A,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[reflexivity]) ).

cnf(c_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r1(sK0,sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_9,c_8]) ).

cnf(c_11,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_9,c_12]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : LCL684+1.001 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.04/0.30  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.04/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.04/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.04/0.30  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.04/0.30  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.04/0.30  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.04/0.30  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.04/0.30  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 23:21:06 UTC 2026
% 0.04/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.04/0.30  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.04/0.30  % Process 3301388 was started by sandbox on n012,
% 0.04/0.30  % Fri Sep 25 23:21:06 2026
% 0.04/0.30  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.04/0.30  
% 0.04/0.30  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.04/0.32  
% 0.04/0.32  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.04/0.32  
% 0.04/0.32  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.04/0.32  % Length of proof is 9.
% 0.04/0.32  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.04/0.32  % Maximum clause weight is 6.000.
% 0.04/0.32  % Given clauses 2.
% 0.04/0.32  
% 0.04/0.32  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------