↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : LCL684+1.001 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 01:08:12 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.52s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    7 (   4 unt;   0 nHn;   7 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   13 (   0 equ;   9 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    p201(skc1),
    file('LCL684+1.001.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    p101(skc1),
    file('LCL684+1.001.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    r1(u,u),
    file('LCL684+1.001.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    ( ~ p101(u)
    | ~ p201(u)
    | ~ r1(v,u)
    | ~ r1(skc1,v) ),
    file('LCL684+1.001.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(8,plain,
    ( ~ p101(u)
    | ~ p201(u)
    | ~ r1(skc1,u) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[3,5]),
    [iquote('0:Res:3.0,5.2')] ).

cnf(9,plain,
    ( ~ p101(skc1)
    | ~ p201(skc1) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[3,8]),
    [iquote('0:Res:3.0,8.2')] ).

cnf(10,plain,
    $false,
    inference(ssi,[status(thm)],[9,2,1]),
    [iquote('0:SSi:9.1,9.0,2.0,1.0,2.0,1.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL684+1.001 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.10/0.35  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Sep  5 16:35:29 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.52  
% 0.20/0.52  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.20/0.52  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.20/0.52  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.52  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.20/0.52  SPASS derived 2 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 6 clauses.
% 0.20/0.52  SPASS allocated 97600 KBytes.
% 0.20/0.52  SPASS spent	0:00:00.14 on the problem.
% 0.20/0.52  		0:00:00.06 for the input.
% 0.20/0.52  		0:00:00.04 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.20/0.52  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.20/0.52  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.20/0.52  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.20/0.52  
% 0.20/0.52  
% 0.20/0.52  Here is a proof with depth 2, length 7 :
% 0.20/0.52  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.52  Formulae used in the proof : main reflexivity
% 0.20/0.52  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------