↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : LCL686+1.001 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:44:50 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.25s 1.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   99 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   27 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  157 (  76   ~;  61   |;  20   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   21 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   33 (   0 sgn  20   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(main,conjecture,
    ~ ? [X1] :
        ~ ( ! [X2] :
              ( ~ r1(X1,X2)
              | ~ p3(X2)
              | ! [X1] :
                  ( ~ r1(X2,X1)
                  | ~ p1(X1) ) )
          | ! [X2] :
              ( ~ r1(X1,X2)
              | ~ ! [X1] :
                    ( ~ r1(X2,X1)
                    | ~ ( ! [X2] :
                            ( ~ r1(X1,X2)
                            | ~ $true )
                        | ~ ! [X2] :
                              ( ~ r1(X1,X2)
                              | ~ ( ( p2(X2)
                                    & ~ p1(X2) )
                                  | ( ~ p2(X2)
                                    & p1(X2) ) ) )
                        | ! [X2] :
                            ( ~ r1(X1,X2)
                            | p3(X2) )
                        | ! [X2] :
                            ( ~ r1(X1,X2)
                            | ( ~ p1(X2)
                              & ~ p2(X2) )
                            | ( p2(X2)
                              & p1(X2) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',main) ).

fof(reflexivity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : r1(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ~ ? [X1] :
          ~ ( ! [X2] :
                ( ~ r1(X1,X2)
                | ~ p3(X2)
                | ! [X1] :
                    ( ~ r1(X2,X1)
                    | ~ p1(X1) ) )
            | ! [X2] :
                ( ~ r1(X1,X2)
                | ~ ! [X1] :
                      ( ~ r1(X2,X1)
                      | ~ ( ! [X2] : ~ r1(X1,X2)
                          | ~ ! [X2] :
                                ( ~ r1(X1,X2)
                                | ~ ( ( p2(X2)
                                      & ~ p1(X2) )
                                    | ( ~ p2(X2)
                                      & p1(X2) ) ) )
                          | ! [X2] :
                              ( ~ r1(X1,X2)
                              | p3(X2) )
                          | ! [X2] :
                              ( ~ r1(X1,X2)
                              | ( ~ p1(X2)
                                & ~ p2(X2) )
                              | ( p2(X2)
                                & p1(X2) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[main])]) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X25,X27] :
      ( r1(esk1_0,esk2_0)
      & p3(esk2_0)
      & r1(esk2_0,esk3_0)
      & p1(esk3_0)
      & r1(esk1_0,esk4_0)
      & ( r1(X25,esk5_1(X25))
        | ~ r1(esk4_0,X25) )
      & ( ~ p2(X27)
        | p1(X27)
        | ~ r1(X25,X27)
        | ~ r1(esk4_0,X25) )
      & ( p2(X27)
        | ~ p1(X27)
        | ~ r1(X25,X27)
        | ~ r1(esk4_0,X25) )
      & ( r1(X25,esk6_1(X25))
        | ~ r1(esk4_0,X25) )
      & ( ~ p3(esk6_1(X25))
        | ~ r1(esk4_0,X25) )
      & ( r1(X25,esk7_1(X25))
        | ~ r1(esk4_0,X25) )
      & ( p1(esk7_1(X25))
        | p2(esk7_1(X25))
        | ~ r1(esk4_0,X25) )
      & ( ~ p2(esk7_1(X25))
        | ~ p1(esk7_1(X25))
        | ~ r1(esk4_0,X25) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X17] : r1(X17,X17),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[reflexivity]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( p2(X1)
    | ~ p1(X1)
    | ~ r1(X2,X1)
    | ~ r1(esk4_0,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    r1(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( p1(X1)
    | ~ p2(X1)
    | ~ r1(X2,X1)
    | ~ r1(esk4_0,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( r1(X1,esk7_1(X1))
    | ~ r1(esk4_0,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( p1(esk7_1(X1))
    | p2(esk7_1(X1))
    | ~ r1(esk4_0,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p2(esk7_1(X1))
    | ~ p1(esk7_1(X1))
    | ~ r1(esk4_0,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( p2(X1)
    | ~ p1(X1)
    | ~ r1(esk4_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( p1(X1)
    | ~ p2(X1)
    | ~ r1(esk7_1(esk4_0),X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_6])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( p2(esk7_1(esk4_0))
    | p1(esk7_1(esk4_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p1(esk7_1(X1))
    | ~ r1(esk4_0,esk7_1(X1))
    | ~ r1(esk4_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    p1(esk7_1(esk4_0)),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_6]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r1(esk4_0,esk7_1(esk4_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_6])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_8]),c_0_6])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : LCL686+1.001 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.34  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 23:00:18 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.35  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.25/1.72  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.25/1.72  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.25/1.72  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.25/1.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.25/1.72  % Total time : 1.371s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------