↑ Up

SOS---2.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : LCL686+1.015 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:32:17 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 2.33s 2.53s
% Output   : Refutation 2.33s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : LCL686+1.015 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jul  4 10:43:27 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.42  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.42  The process was started by sandbox on n017.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.42  Mon Jul  4 10:43:27 2022
% 0.19/0.42  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 11178.
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.42  set(auto).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.42  clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  formula_list(usable).
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy
% 0.19/0.42  will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.19/0.42  factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.19/0.42     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.92/1.14  
% 0.92/1.14  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.92/1.14  
% 0.92/1.14  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.92/1.14  
% 0.92/1.14  
% 0.92/1.14  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.92/1.14  
% 0.92/1.14  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.92/1.14  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.92/1.14  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.92/1.14  number of clauses in intial UL: 221
% 0.92/1.14  number of clauses initially in problem: 227
% 0.92/1.14  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 97
% 0.92/1.14  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 96
% 0.92/1.14  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.92/1.14  absolute distinct symbol count: 95
% 0.92/1.14     distinct predicate count: 46
% 0.92/1.14     distinct function count: 45
% 0.92/1.14     distinct constant count: 4
% 0.92/1.14  
% 0.92/1.14  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.92/1.14  
% 0.92/1.14  
% 0.92/1.14  
% 0.92/1.14  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.92/1.14  
% 0.92/1.14  =========== start of search ===========
% 2.33/2.53  
% 2.33/2.53  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 2.33/2.53  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.33/2.53  % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.33/2.53  
% 2.33/2.53  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.33/2.53  
% 2.33/2.53  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.33/2.53  
% 2.33/2.53  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.33/2.53  
% 2.33/2.53  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.33/2.53  
% 2.33/2.53  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.33/2.53  
% 2.33/2.53  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.33/2.53  
% 2.33/2.53  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.33/2.53  
% 2.33/2.53  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.33/2.53  
% 2.33/2.53  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.33/2.53  
% 2.33/2.53  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   2.15 sec ----> 586 [hyper,585,219,222,584] {-} $F.
% 2.33/2.53  
% 2.33/2.53  Length of proof is 4.  Level of proof is 3.
% 2.33/2.53  
% 2.33/2.53  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 2.33/2.53  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.33/2.53  % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.33/2.53  
% 2.33/2.53  129 [] {+} -r1($c3,A)| -r1(A,B)| -p2(B)|p1(B).
% 2.33/2.53  130 [] {+} -r1($c3,A)| -r1(A,B)|p2(B)| -p1(B).
% 2.33/2.53  133 [] {+} -r1($c3,A)|r1(A,$f45(A)).
% 2.33/2.53  218 [] {+} -r1($c3,A)|p1($f45(A))|p2($f45(A)).
% 2.33/2.53  219 [] {+} -r1($c3,A)| -p2($f45(A))| -p1($f45(A)).
% 2.33/2.53  222 [] {-} r1(A,A).
% 2.33/2.53  228 [hyper,222,218] {+} p1($f45($c3))|p2($f45($c3)).
% 2.33/2.53  271 [hyper,222,133] {-} r1($c3,$f45($c3)).
% 2.33/2.53  584 [hyper,228,129,271,222,factor_simp] {+} p1($f45($c3)).
% 2.33/2.53  585 [hyper,584,130,271,222] {-} p2($f45($c3)).
% 2.33/2.53  586 [hyper,585,219,222,584] {-} $F.
% 2.33/2.53  
% 2.33/2.53  % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.33/2.53  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 2.33/2.53  
% 2.33/2.53  
% 2.33/2.53  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.33/2.53  
% 2.33/2.53  
% 2.33/2.53  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.33/2.53  
% 2.33/2.53  ============ end of search ============
% 2.33/2.53  
% 2.33/2.53  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 2.33/2.53  
% 2.33/2.53  true clauses given           4      (28.6%)
% 2.33/2.53  false clauses given         10
% 2.33/2.53  
% 2.33/2.53        FALSE     TRUE
% 2.33/2.53     4  2         0
% 2.33/2.53     5  1         0
% 2.33/2.53     6  13        38
% 2.33/2.53     7  3         1
% 2.33/2.53     8  39        94
% 2.33/2.53     9  3         1
% 2.33/2.53    10  0         4
% 2.33/2.53    11  1         3
% 2.33/2.53    12  0         4
% 2.33/2.53    13  4         0
% 2.33/2.53    14  0         4
% 2.33/2.53    15  4         0
% 2.33/2.53    16  1         3
% 2.33/2.53    17  4         0
% 2.33/2.53    18  4         0
% 2.33/2.53    19  4         0
% 2.33/2.53    20  4         0
% 2.33/2.53    21  4         0
% 2.33/2.53    22  3         1
% 2.33/2.53    23  3         1
% 2.33/2.53    24  1         3
% 2.33/2.53    25  0         4
% 2.33/2.53    26  4         0
% 2.33/2.53    27  0         4
% 2.33/2.53    28  4         0
% 2.33/2.53    29  1         3
% 2.33/2.53    30  3         1
% 2.33/2.53    31  3         1
% 2.33/2.53    32  1         3
% 2.33/2.53    33  1         3
% 2.33/2.53    34  3         1
% 2.33/2.53    35  3         1
% 2.33/2.53    36  1         3
% 2.33/2.53    37  1         3
% 2.33/2.53    38  4         0
% 2.33/2.53    39  4         0
% 2.33/2.53    40  4         0
% 2.33/2.53    41  4         0
% 2.33/2.53    42  3         1
% 2.33/2.53    43  4         0
% 2.33/2.53    44  1         3
% 2.33/2.53    45  3         1
% 2.33/2.53    46  3         1
% 2.33/2.53    47  0         3
% 2.33/2.53    48  0         3
% 2.33/2.53  tot:  153       196      (56.2% true)
% 2.33/2.53  
% 2.33/2.53  
% 2.33/2.53  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 2.33/2.53  
% 2.33/2.53  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 2.33/2.53  
% 2.33/2.53  Process 11178 finished Mon Jul  4 10:43:29 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------