↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : LCL686+1.015 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 01:08:13 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.80s
% Output   : Refutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL686+1.015 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.07/0.35  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.07/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Sep  4 19:18:42 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.80  
% 0.12/0.80  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.12/0.80  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.12/0.80  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.12/0.80  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.12/0.80  SPASS derived 539 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 450 clauses.
% 0.12/0.80  SPASS allocated 98473 KBytes.
% 0.12/0.80  SPASS spent	0:00:00.42 on the problem.
% 0.12/0.80  		0:00:00.06 for the input.
% 0.12/0.80  		0:00:00.13 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.12/0.80  		0:00:00.01 for inferences.
% 0.12/0.80  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.12/0.80  		0:00:00.14 for the reduction.
% 0.12/0.80  
% 0.12/0.80  
% 0.12/0.80  Here is a proof with depth 41, length 95 :
% 0.12/0.80  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.12/0.80  7[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(u,skf89(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  9[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(u,skf45(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  10[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf85(u),skf86(u))*l.
% 0.12/0.80  11[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf84(u),skf85(u))*l.
% 0.12/0.80  12[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf83(u),skf84(u))*l.
% 0.12/0.80  13[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf82(u),skf83(u))*l.
% 0.12/0.80  14[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf81(u),skf82(u))*l.
% 0.12/0.80  15[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf80(u),skf81(u))*l.
% 0.12/0.80  16[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf79(u),skf80(u))*l.
% 0.12/0.80  17[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf78(u),skf79(u))*l.
% 0.12/0.80  18[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf77(u),skf78(u))*l.
% 0.12/0.80  19[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf76(u),skf77(u))*l.
% 0.12/0.80  20[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf75(u),skf76(u))*l.
% 0.12/0.80  21[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf74(u),skf75(u))*l.
% 0.12/0.80  22[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf73(u),skf74(u))*l.
% 0.12/0.80  23[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf72(u),skf73(u))*l.
% 0.12/0.80  24[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf71(u),skf72(u))*l.
% 0.12/0.80  25[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf70(u),skf71(u))*l.
% 0.12/0.80  26[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf69(u),skf70(u))*l.
% 0.12/0.80  27[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf68(u),skf69(u))*l.
% 0.12/0.80  28[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf67(u),skf68(u))*l.
% 0.12/0.80  29[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf66(u),skf67(u))*l.
% 0.12/0.80  30[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf65(u),skf66(u))*l.
% 0.12/0.80  31[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf64(u),skf65(u))*l.
% 0.12/0.80  32[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf63(u),skf64(u))*l.
% 0.12/0.80  33[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf62(u),skf63(u))*l.
% 0.12/0.80  34[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf61(u),skf62(u))*l.
% 0.12/0.80  35[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf60(u),skf61(u))*l.
% 0.12/0.80  36[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf59(u),skf60(u))*l.
% 0.12/0.80  37[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf58(u),skf59(u))*l.
% 0.12/0.80  38[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf57(u),skf58(u))*l.
% 0.12/0.80  39[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf56(u),skf57(u))*l.
% 0.12/0.80  40[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf55(u),skf56(u))*l.
% 0.12/0.80  41[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf54(u),skf55(u))*l.
% 0.12/0.80  42[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf53(u),skf54(u))*l.
% 0.12/0.80  43[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf52(u),skf53(u))*l.
% 0.12/0.80  44[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf51(u),skf52(u))*l.
% 0.12/0.80  45[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf50(u),skf51(u))*l.
% 0.12/0.80  46[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf49(u),skf50(u))*l.
% 0.12/0.80  47[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf48(u),skf49(u))*l.
% 0.12/0.80  48[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf47(u),skf48(u))*l.
% 0.12/0.80  49[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf46(u),skf47(u))*l.
% 0.12/0.80  50[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf45(u),skf46(u))*l.
% 0.12/0.80  95[0:Inp] || r1(skc7,u) -> p2(skf89(u))* p1(skf89(u)).
% 0.12/0.80  96[0:Inp] || r1(u,v)* r1(v,w)* -> r1(u,w)*.
% 0.12/0.80  139[0:Inp] || p1(skf89(u)) p2(skf89(u))* r1(skc7,u) -> .
% 0.12/0.80  140[0:Inp] p2(u) || r1(v,u)*+ r1(skc7,v)* -> p1(u)*.
% 0.12/0.80  141[0:Inp] p1(u) || r1(v,u)*+ r1(skc7,v)* -> p2(u)*.
% 0.12/0.80  400[0:OCh:96.1,96.0,50.0,9.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf46(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  401[0:OCh:96.1,96.0,49.0,400.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf47(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  402[0:OCh:96.1,96.0,48.0,401.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf48(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  403[0:OCh:96.1,96.0,402.0,47.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf49(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  404[0:OCh:96.1,96.0,46.0,403.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf50(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  405[0:OCh:96.1,96.0,45.0,404.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf51(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  406[0:OCh:96.1,96.0,44.0,405.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf52(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  407[0:OCh:96.1,96.0,43.0,406.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf53(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  408[0:OCh:96.1,96.0,407.0,42.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf54(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  409[0:OCh:96.1,96.0,41.0,408.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf55(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  410[0:OCh:96.1,96.0,40.0,409.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf56(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  411[0:OCh:96.1,96.0,39.0,410.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf57(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  412[0:OCh:96.1,96.0,38.0,411.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf58(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  413[0:OCh:96.1,96.0,412.0,37.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf59(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  414[0:OCh:96.1,96.0,36.0,413.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf60(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  415[0:OCh:96.1,96.0,35.0,414.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf61(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  416[0:OCh:96.1,96.0,34.0,415.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf62(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  417[0:OCh:96.1,96.0,33.0,416.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf63(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  418[0:OCh:96.1,96.0,417.0,32.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf64(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  419[0:OCh:96.1,96.0,31.0,418.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf65(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  420[0:OCh:96.1,96.0,30.0,419.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf66(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  421[0:OCh:96.1,96.0,29.0,420.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf67(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  422[0:OCh:96.1,96.0,28.0,421.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf68(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  423[0:OCh:96.1,96.0,422.0,27.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf69(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  424[0:OCh:96.1,96.0,26.0,423.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf70(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  425[0:OCh:96.1,96.0,25.0,424.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf71(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  426[0:OCh:96.1,96.0,24.0,425.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf72(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  427[0:OCh:96.1,96.0,23.0,426.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf73(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  428[0:OCh:96.1,96.0,427.0,22.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf74(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  429[0:OCh:96.1,96.0,21.0,428.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf75(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  430[0:OCh:96.1,96.0,20.0,429.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf76(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  431[0:OCh:96.1,96.0,19.0,430.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf77(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  432[0:OCh:96.1,96.0,18.0,431.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf78(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  433[0:OCh:96.1,96.0,432.0,17.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf79(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  434[0:OCh:96.1,96.0,16.0,433.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf80(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  435[0:OCh:96.1,96.0,15.0,434.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf81(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  436[0:OCh:96.1,96.0,14.0,435.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf82(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  437[0:OCh:96.1,96.0,13.0,436.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf83(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  438[0:OCh:96.1,96.0,437.0,12.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf84(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  439[0:OCh:96.1,96.0,11.0,438.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf85(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  440[0:OCh:96.1,96.0,10.0,439.0] ||  -> r1(u,skf86(u))*r.
% 0.12/0.80  586[0:Res:7.0,140.1] p2(skf89(u)) || r1(skc7,u) -> p1(skf89(u))*.
% 0.12/0.80  759[0:MRR:586.0,95.1] || r1(skc7,u) -> p1(skf89(u))*.
% 0.12/0.80  760[0:MRR:139.0,759.1] || p2(skf89(u))* r1(skc7,u) -> .
% 0.12/0.80  813[0:Res:7.0,141.1] p1(skf89(u)) || r1(skc7,u) -> p2(skf89(u))*.
% 0.12/0.80  987[0:MRR:813.0,813.2,759.1,760.0] || r1(skc7,u)* -> .
% 0.12/0.80  988[0:UnC:987.0,440.0] ||  -> .
% 0.12/0.80  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.12/0.80  Formulae used in the proof : main reflexivity transitivity
% 0.12/0.80  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------