↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : LCL702^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:14:31 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.27s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   28
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   77 (  62 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  436 (  88 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  668 (  58   ~;  58   |;  15   &; 466   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  16  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :  112 ( 112   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   54 (  50 usr;   6 con; 0-4 aty)
%                                         (  55  !!;   0  ??;   0 @@+;   0 @@-)
%            Number of variables   :  193 ( 152   ^;  40   !;   1   ?; 193   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    mu: $tType ).

thf(type_def_6,type,
    sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    meq_ind: mu > mu > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    meq_prop: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    mnot: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    mor: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    mand: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    mimplies: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    mimplied: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    mequiv: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    mxor: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    mforall_ind: ( mu > $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_11,type,
    mforall_prop: ( ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_12,type,
    mexists_ind: ( mu > $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_13,type,
    mexists_prop: ( ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_14,type,
    mtrue: $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_15,type,
    mfalse: $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_16,type,
    mbox: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_17,type,
    mdia: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_18,type,
    mreflexive: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_19,type,
    msymmetric: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_20,type,
    mserial: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_21,type,
    mtransitive: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_22,type,
    meuclidean: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_23,type,
    mpartially_functional: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_24,type,
    mfunctional: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_25,type,
    mweakly_dense: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_26,type,
    mweakly_connected: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_27,type,
    mweakly_directed: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_28,type,
    mvalid: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_29,type,
    minvalid: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_30,type,
    msatisfiable: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_31,type,
    mcountersatisfiable: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_32,type,
    vPI: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_33,type,
    vSIGMA: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_34,type,
    db2: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_35,type,
    db1: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_36,type,
    db0: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_37,type,
    vLAM: 
      !>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( X1 > X0 > X1 ) ).

thf(func_def_38,type,
    vIMP: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_39,type,
    vAND: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_40,type,
    db3: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_41,type,
    vOR: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_42,type,
    vEQ: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( X0 > X0 > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_43,type,
    vNOT: $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_46,type,
    db4: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_47,type,
    sK0: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_49,type,
    sK2: $i > $o ).

thf(f3,axiom,
    ( ( ^ [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
          ~ ( X0 @ X1 ) )
    = mnot ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mnot) ).

thf(f4,axiom,
    ( mor
    = ( ^ [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o,X2: $i] :
          ( ( X1 @ X2 )
          | ( X0 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mor) ).

thf(f6,axiom,
    ( mimplies
    = ( ^ [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o] : ( mor @ ( mnot @ X0 ) @ X1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mimplies) ).

thf(f11,axiom,
    ( ( ^ [X0: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o,X1: $i] :
        ! [X2: $i > $o] : ( X0 @ X2 @ X1 ) )
    = mforall_prop ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mforall_prop) ).

thf(f16,axiom,
    ( mbox
    = ( ^ [X0: $i > $i > $o,X1: $i > $o,X2: $i] :
        ! [X3: $i] :
          ( ~ ( X0 @ X2 @ X3 )
          | ( X1 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mbox) ).

thf(f21,axiom,
    ( mtransitive
    = ( ^ [X0: $i > $i > $o] :
        ! [X3: $i,X2: $i,X1: $i] :
          ( ( ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
            & ( X0 @ X2 @ X3 ) )
         => ( X0 @ X1 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mtransitive) ).

thf(f28,axiom,
    ( mvalid
    = ( ^ [X0: $i > $o] :
        ! [X1: $i] : ( X0 @ X1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mvalid) ).

thf(f32,conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( mtransitive @ X0 )
     => ( mvalid
        @ ( mforall_prop
          @ ^ [X1: $i > $o] : ( mimplies @ ( mbox @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( mbox @ X0 @ ( mbox @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj) ).

thf(f33,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0: $i > $i > $o] :
        ( ( mtransitive @ X0 )
       => ( mvalid
          @ ( mforall_prop
            @ ^ [X1: $i > $o] : ( mimplies @ ( mbox @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( mbox @ X0 @ ( mbox @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f32]) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    ( mbox
    = ( ^ [X0: $i > $i > $o,X1: $i > $o,X2: $i] :
        ! [X3: $i] :
          ( ~ ( X0 @ X2 @ X3 )
          | ( X1 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f16]) ).

thf(f40,plain,
    ( mbox
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y3: $i] :
              ( ( Y1 @ Y3 )
              | ~ ( Y0 @ Y2 @ Y3 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f39]) ).

thf(f41,plain,
    ( mvalid
    = ( ^ [X0: $i > $o] :
        ! [X1: $i] : ( X0 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f28]) ).

thf(f42,plain,
    ( mvalid
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] : ( Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f41]) ).

thf(f50,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: $i > $i > $o] :
        ( ( mtransitive @ X0 )
       => ( mvalid
          @ ( mforall_prop
            @ ^ [X1: $i > $o] : ( mimplies @ ( mbox @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( mbox @ X0 @ ( mbox @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f33]) ).

thf(f51,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: $i > $i > $o] :
        ( ( ( mtransitive @ X0 )
          = $true )
       => ( $true
          = ( mvalid
            @ ( mforall_prop
              @ ^ [Y0: $i > $o] : ( mimplies @ ( mbox @ X0 @ Y0 ) @ ( mbox @ X0 @ ( mbox @ X0 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f50]) ).

thf(f74,plain,
    ( mtransitive
    = ( ^ [X0: $i > $i > $o] :
        ! [X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
          ( ( ( X0 @ X3 @ X2 )
            & ( X0 @ X2 @ X1 ) )
         => ( X0 @ X3 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f21]) ).

thf(f75,plain,
    ( mtransitive
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i > $o] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( !! @ $i
              @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                  ( !! @ $i
                  @ ^ [Y3: $i] :
                      ( ( ( Y0 @ Y2 @ Y3 )
                        & ( Y0 @ Y1 @ Y2 ) )
                     => ( Y0 @ Y1 @ Y3 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f74]) ).

thf(f76,plain,
    ( mimplies
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o] : ( mor @ ( mnot @ Y0 ) @ Y1 ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f80,plain,
    ( ( ^ [X0: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o,X1: $i] :
        ! [X2: $i > $o] : ( X0 @ X2 @ X1 ) )
    = mforall_prop ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f81,plain,
    ( mforall_prop
    = ( ^ [Y0: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o,Y1: $i] :
          ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: $i > $o] : ( Y0 @ Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f80]) ).

thf(f82,plain,
    ( mor
    = ( ^ [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o,X2: $i] :
          ( ( X1 @ X2 )
          | ( X0 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f83,plain,
    ( mor
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
          ( ( Y0 @ Y2 )
          | ( Y1 @ Y2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f82]) ).

thf(f85,plain,
    ( ( ^ [X0: $i > $o,X1: $i] :
          ~ ( X0 @ X1 ) )
    = mnot ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f3]) ).

thf(f86,plain,
    ( mnot
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i] :
          ~ ( Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f85]) ).

thf(f87,plain,
    ? [X0: $i > $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( mtransitive @ X0 )
        = $true )
      & ( $true
       != ( mvalid
          @ ( mforall_prop
            @ ^ [Y0: $i > $o] : ( mimplies @ ( mbox @ X0 @ Y0 ) @ ( mbox @ X0 @ ( mbox @ X0 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f51]) ).

thf(f88,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( mtransitive @ sK0 ) )
    & ( $true
     != ( mvalid
        @ ( mforall_prop
          @ ^ [Y0: $i > $o] : ( mimplies @ ( mbox @ sK0 @ Y0 ) @ ( mbox @ sK0 @ ( mbox @ sK0 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X0,sK0)],[f87]) ).

thf(f95,plain,
    ( mimplies
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o] : ( mor @ ( mnot @ Y0 ) @ Y1 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f76]) ).

thf(f97,plain,
    ( mforall_prop
    = ( ^ [Y0: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o,Y1: $i] :
          ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: $i > $o] : ( Y0 @ Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f81]) ).

thf(f100,plain,
    ( mbox
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y3: $i] :
              ( ( Y1 @ Y3 )
              | ~ ( Y0 @ Y2 @ Y3 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f40]) ).

thf(f105,plain,
    ( mnot
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i] :
          ~ ( Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f86]) ).

thf(f113,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( mvalid
      @ ( mforall_prop
        @ ^ [Y0: $i > $o] : ( mimplies @ ( mbox @ sK0 @ Y0 ) @ ( mbox @ sK0 @ ( mbox @ sK0 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f88]) ).

thf(f114,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( mtransitive @ sK0 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f88]) ).

thf(f115,plain,
    ( mtransitive
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i > $o] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( !! @ $i
              @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                  ( !! @ $i
                  @ ^ [Y3: $i] :
                      ( ( ( Y0 @ Y2 @ Y3 )
                        & ( Y0 @ Y1 @ Y2 ) )
                     => ( Y0 @ Y1 @ Y3 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f75]) ).

thf(f116,plain,
    ( mor
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
          ( ( Y0 @ Y2 )
          | ( Y1 @ Y2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f83]) ).

thf(f121,plain,
    ( mvalid
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] : ( Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f42]) ).

thf(f125,plain,
    ( mimplies
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o] :
          ( ^ [Y2: $i > $o,Y3: $i > $o,Y4: $i] :
              ( ( Y2 @ Y4 )
              | ( Y3 @ Y4 ) )
          @ ( ^ [Y2: $i > $o,Y3: $i] :
                ~ ( Y2 @ Y3 )
            @ Y0 )
          @ Y1 ) ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f95,f116,f105]) ).

thf(f133,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i > $o] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( !! @ $i
              @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                  ( !! @ $i
                  @ ^ [Y3: $i] :
                      ( ( ( Y0 @ Y2 @ Y3 )
                        & ( Y0 @ Y1 @ Y2 ) )
                     => ( Y0 @ Y1 @ Y3 ) ) ) ) )
      @ sK0 )
    = $true ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f114,f115]) ).

thf(f134,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] : ( Y0 @ Y1 ) )
      @ ( ^ [Y0: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o,Y1: $i] :
            ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
            @ ^ [Y2: $i > $o] : ( Y0 @ Y2 @ Y1 ) )
        @ ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
            ( ^ [Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i > $o] :
                ( ^ [Y3: $i > $o,Y4: $i > $o,Y5: $i] :
                    ( ( Y3 @ Y5 )
                    | ( Y4 @ Y5 ) )
                @ ( ^ [Y3: $i > $o,Y4: $i] :
                      ~ ( Y3 @ Y4 )
                  @ Y1 )
                @ Y2 )
            @ ( ^ [Y1: $i > $i > $o,Y2: $i > $o,Y3: $i] :
                  ( !! @ $i
                  @ ^ [Y4: $i] :
                      ( ( Y2 @ Y4 )
                      | ~ ( Y1 @ Y3 @ Y4 ) ) )
              @ sK0
              @ Y0 )
            @ ( ^ [Y1: $i > $i > $o,Y2: $i > $o,Y3: $i] :
                  ( !! @ $i
                  @ ^ [Y4: $i] :
                      ( ( Y2 @ Y4 )
                      | ~ ( Y1 @ Y3 @ Y4 ) ) )
              @ sK0
              @ ( ^ [Y1: $i > $i > $o,Y2: $i > $o,Y3: $i] :
                    ( !! @ $i
                    @ ^ [Y4: $i] :
                        ( ( Y2 @ Y4 )
                        | ~ ( Y1 @ Y3 @ Y4 ) ) )
                @ sK0
                @ Y0 ) ) ) ) )
   != $true ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f113,f121,f97,f125,f100,f100,f100]) ).

thf(f135,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( !! @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( !! @ $i
              @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                  ( ( ( sK0 @ Y1 @ Y2 )
                    & ( sK0 @ Y0 @ Y1 ) )
                 => ( sK0 @ Y0 @ Y2 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f133]) ).

thf(f136,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                ( !! @ $i
                @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                    ( ( ( sK0 @ Y1 @ Y2 )
                      & ( sK0 @ Y0 @ Y1 ) )
                   => ( sK0 @ Y0 @ Y2 ) ) ) )
        @ X1 ) ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f135]) ).

thf(f137,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( $true
      = ( !! @ $i
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                ( ( ( sK0 @ Y0 @ Y1 )
                  & ( sK0 @ X1 @ Y0 ) )
               => ( sK0 @ X1 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f136]) ).

thf(f138,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                ( ( ( sK0 @ Y0 @ Y1 )
                  & ( sK0 @ X1 @ Y0 ) )
               => ( sK0 @ X1 @ Y1 ) ) )
        @ X2 ) ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f137]) ).

thf(f139,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( $true
      = ( !! @ $i
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ( ( sK0 @ X2 @ Y0 )
              & ( sK0 @ X1 @ X2 ) )
           => ( sK0 @ X1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f138]) ).

thf(f140,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ( ( sK0 @ X2 @ Y0 )
              & ( sK0 @ X1 @ X2 ) )
           => ( sK0 @ X1 @ Y0 ) )
        @ X3 ) ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f139]) ).

thf(f141,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( sK0 @ X2 @ X3 )
          & ( sK0 @ X1 @ X2 ) )
       => ( sK0 @ X1 @ X3 ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f140]) ).

thf(f142,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( ( sK0 @ X2 @ X3 )
          & ( sK0 @ X1 @ X2 ) ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( sK0 @ X1 @ X3 ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f141]) ).

thf(f143,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( sK0 @ X2 @ X3 )
        = $false )
      | ( $true
        = ( sK0 @ X1 @ X3 ) )
      | ( ( sK0 @ X1 @ X2 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f142]) ).

thf(f144,plain,
    ( ( !! @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
          @ ^ [Y1: $i > $o] :
              ( ~ ( !! @ $i
                  @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                      ( ( Y1 @ Y2 )
                      | ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 @ Y2 ) ) )
              | ( !! @ $i
                @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                    ( ( !! @ $i
                      @ ^ [Y3: $i] :
                          ( ( Y1 @ Y3 )
                          | ~ ( sK0 @ Y2 @ Y3 ) ) )
                    | ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 @ Y2 ) ) ) ) ) )
   != $true ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f134]) ).

thf(f145,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
          @ ^ [Y1: $i > $o] :
              ( ~ ( !! @ $i
                  @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                      ( ( Y1 @ Y2 )
                      | ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 @ Y2 ) ) )
              | ( !! @ $i
                @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                    ( ( !! @ $i
                      @ ^ [Y3: $i] :
                          ( ( Y1 @ Y3 )
                          | ~ ( sK0 @ Y2 @ Y3 ) ) )
                    | ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 @ Y2 ) ) ) ) )
      @ sK1 )
    = $false ),
    inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f144]) ).

thf(f146,plain,
    ( ( !! @ ( $i > $o )
      @ ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
          ( ~ ( !! @ $i
              @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                  ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
                  | ~ ( sK0 @ sK1 @ Y1 ) ) )
          | ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                ( ( !! @ $i
                  @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                      ( ( Y0 @ Y2 )
                      | ~ ( sK0 @ Y1 @ Y2 ) ) )
                | ~ ( sK0 @ sK1 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f145]) ).

thf(f147,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
          ( ~ ( !! @ $i
              @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                  ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
                  | ~ ( sK0 @ sK1 @ Y1 ) ) )
          | ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                ( ( !! @ $i
                  @ ^ [Y2: $i] :
                      ( ( Y0 @ Y2 )
                      | ~ ( sK0 @ Y1 @ Y2 ) ) )
                | ~ ( sK0 @ sK1 @ Y1 ) ) ) )
      @ sK2 )
    = $false ),
    inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f146]) ).

thf(f148,plain,
    ( $false
    = ( ~ ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
              ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
              | ~ ( sK0 @ sK1 @ Y0 ) ) )
      | ( !! @ $i
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ( !! @ $i
              @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                  ( ( sK2 @ Y1 )
                  | ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) )
            | ~ ( sK0 @ sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f147]) ).

thf(f149,plain,
    ( ( !! @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                ( ( sK2 @ Y1 )
                | ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) )
          | ~ ( sK0 @ sK1 @ Y0 ) ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f148]) ).

thf(f150,plain,
    ( ( ~ ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
              ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
              | ~ ( sK0 @ sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f148]) ).

thf(f151,plain,
    ( ( !! @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
          | ~ ( sK0 @ sK1 @ Y0 ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f150]) ).

thf(f152,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
            | ~ ( sK0 @ sK1 @ Y0 ) )
        @ X1 )
      = $true ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f151]) ).

thf(f153,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( sK2 @ X1 )
        | ~ ( sK0 @ sK1 @ X1 ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f152]) ).

thf(f154,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( sK2 @ X1 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK1 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f153]) ).

thf(f155,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( sK0 @ sK1 @ X1 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( sK2 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f154]) ).

thf(f156,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                ( ( sK2 @ Y1 )
                | ~ ( sK0 @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) )
          | ~ ( sK0 @ sK1 @ Y0 ) )
      @ sK3 )
    = $false ),
    inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f149]) ).

thf(f157,plain,
    ( $false
    = ( ( !! @ $i
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
            | ~ ( sK0 @ sK3 @ Y0 ) ) )
      | ~ ( sK0 @ sK1 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f156]) ).

thf(f158,plain,
    ( $false
    = ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK1 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f157]) ).

thf(f159,plain,
    ( ( !! @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
          | ~ ( sK0 @ sK3 @ Y0 ) ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f157]) ).

thf(f160,plain,
    ( $false
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
          | ~ ( sK0 @ sK3 @ Y0 ) )
      @ sK4 ) ),
    inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f159]) ).

thf(f161,plain,
    ( ( ( sK2 @ sK4 )
      | ~ ( sK0 @ sK3 @ sK4 ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f160]) ).

thf(f162,plain,
    ( ( ~ ( sK0 @ sK3 @ sK4 ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f161]) ).

thf(f163,plain,
    ( ( sK2 @ sK4 )
    = $false ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f161]) ).

thf(f164,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( sK0 @ sK3 @ sK4 ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f162]) ).

thf(f165,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( sK0 @ sK1 @ sK3 ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f158]) ).

thf(f180,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( sK0 @ X0 @ sK4 ) )
      | ( $true = $false )
      | ( ( sK0 @ X0 @ sK3 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f164,f143]) ).

thf(f182,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( sK0 @ X0 @ sK4 ) )
      | ( ( sK0 @ X0 @ sK3 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f180]) ).

thf(f207,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK1 @ sK3 )
      = $false )
    | ( $true = $false )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK4 ) ) ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f155,f182]) ).

thf(f210,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK1 @ sK3 )
      = $false )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK4 ) ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f207]) ).

thf(f216,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK4 ) ) ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f210,f165]) ).

thf(f217,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( sK2 @ sK4 ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f216]) ).

thf(f220,plain,
    $true = $false,
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f217,f163]) ).

thf(f221,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f220]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : LCL702^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.18  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.07/0.18  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 09:47:11 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.18  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.07/0.18  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.22  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.07/0.23  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.27  % (120890)Detected a higher-order problem, will run a greedy HOL sequence.
% 0.21/0.27  % (120895)lrs+10_40_drc=off:e2e=on:si=on:uwa=one_side_interpreted:random_seed=1050171272:s2a=on:i=87:rtra=on:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/87Mi)
% 0.21/0.27  % (120895) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-120890-120895"...
% 0.21/0.27  % (120901)WARNING Broken Constraint: if ho_split_queue_ratios(1,8) has been set then ho_split_queue(off) is equal to on
% 0.21/0.27  % (120901)WARNING Broken Constraint: if sine_to_age_tolerance(5) has been set then sine_to_age(off) is equal to on or sine_to_pred_levels(off) is not equal to off or sine_level_split_queue(off) is equal to on
% 0.21/0.27  % (120895)...printing done.
% 0.21/0.27  % (120895)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.27  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.27  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.27  % (120895)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.27  % (120895)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.21/0.27  % (120895)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.21/0.27  % (120895)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.21/0.27  % (120895)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.27  % (120895)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.27  % (120895)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.21/0.27  % (120895)Instructions burned: 18 (million)
% 0.21/0.27  % (120890)Success in time 0.03 s
% 0.21/0.27  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------