↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : LCL707^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:14:10 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.94s 2.23s
% Output   : Refutation 3.94s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL707^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.1.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.11/0.22  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.22  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.22  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.22  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.22  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.22  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.22  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.22  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 09:45:33 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.22  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.22  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.86/0.78  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.18/1.03  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (241ms). 
% 1.18/1.04  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.17/1.43  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.17/1.43  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.61/1.61  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.61/1.64  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.61/1.64  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.61/1.65  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.61/1.65  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.94/2.22  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.94/2.23  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.94/2.23  % Time passed: 1869ms (effective reasoning time: 1177ms)
% 3.94/2.23  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.94/2.23  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 3.94/2.23  % No. of inferences in proof: 4
% 3.94/2.23  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1869 ms resp. 1177 ms w/o parsing
% 3.94/2.28  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.94/2.28  thf(mu_type, type, mu: $tType).
% 3.94/2.28  thf(mnot_decl, type, mnot: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o))).
% 3.94/2.28  thf(mor_decl, type, mor: (($i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 3.94/2.28  thf(mand_decl, type, mand: (($i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 3.94/2.28  thf(mimplies_decl, type, mimplies: (($i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 3.94/2.28  thf(mforall_prop_decl, type, mforall_prop: ((($i > $o) > ($i > $o)) > ($i > $o))).
% 3.94/2.28  thf(mbox_decl, type, mbox: (($i > ($i > $o)) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 3.94/2.28  thf(mweakly_connected_decl, type, mweakly_connected: (($i > ($i > $o)) > $o)).
% 3.94/2.28  thf(mvalid_decl, type, mvalid: (($i > $o) > $o)).
% 3.94/2.28  thf(mnot_def, definition, mnot = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:$i]: ~ (A @ B)) ).
% 3.94/2.28  thf(mor_def, definition, mor = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:($i > $o),C:$i]: ((A @ C) | (B @ C))) ).
% 3.94/2.28  thf(mand_def, definition, mand = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:($i > $o)]: (mnot @ (mor @ (mnot @ A) @ (mnot @ B)))) ).
% 3.94/2.28  thf(mimplies_def, definition, mimplies = (^ [A:($i > $o)]: (mor @ (mnot @ A))) ).
% 3.94/2.28  thf(mforall_prop_def, definition, mforall_prop = (^ [A:(($i > $o) > ($i > $o)),B:$i]: ! [C:($i > $o)]: (A @ C @ B)) ).
% 3.94/2.28  thf(mbox_def, definition, mbox = (^ [A:($i > ($i > $o)),B:($i > $o),C:$i]: ! [D:$i]: (~ (A @ C @ D) | (B @ D))) ).
% 3.94/2.28  thf(mweakly_connected_def, definition, mweakly_connected = (^ [A:($i > ($i > $o))]: ! [B:$i,C:$i,D:$i]: (((A @ B @ C) & (A @ B @ D)) => ((A @ C @ D) | (C = D) | (A @ D @ C)))) ).
% 3.94/2.28  thf(mvalid_def, definition, mvalid = ((!) @ $i) ).
% 3.94/2.28  thf(1,conjecture,((! [A:($i > ($i > $o))]: ((mweakly_connected @ A) => (mvalid @ (mforall_prop @ (^ [B:($i > $o)]: (mforall_prop @ (^ [C:($i > $o)]: (mor @ (mbox @ A @ (mimplies @ (mand @ B @ (mbox @ A @ B)) @ C)) @ (mbox @ A @ (mimplies @ (mand @ C @ (mbox @ A @ C)) @ B))))))))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj)).
% 3.94/2.28  thf(2,negated_conjecture,((~ (! [A:($i > ($i > $o))]: ((mweakly_connected @ A) => (mvalid @ (mforall_prop @ (^ [B:($i > $o)]: (mforall_prop @ (^ [C:($i > $o)]: (mor @ (mbox @ A @ (mimplies @ (mand @ B @ (mbox @ A @ B)) @ C)) @ (mbox @ A @ (mimplies @ (mand @ C @ (mbox @ A @ C)) @ B)))))))))))),inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1])).
% 3.94/2.28  thf(3,plain,((~ (! [A:($i > ($i > $o))]: ((! [B:$i,C:$i,D:$i]: (((A @ B @ C) & (A @ B @ D)) => ((A @ C @ D) | (C = D) | (A @ D @ C)))) => (! [B:$i,C:($i > $o),D:($i > $o)]: (! [E:$i]: (~ (A @ B @ E) | ~ (C @ E) | ~ (! [F:$i]: (~ (A @ E @ F) | (C @ F))) | (D @ E)) | ! [E:$i]: (~ (A @ B @ E) | ~ (D @ E) | ~ (! [F:$i]: (~ (A @ E @ F) | (D @ F))) | (C @ E)))))))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2])).
% 3.94/2.28  thf(17,plain,(($false)),inference(e,[status(thm)],[3])).
% 3.94/2.28  % SZS output end Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.94/2.28  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------