↑ Up

Nitpick---2016.CSA-FMo.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Nitpick---2016
% Problem  : LCL743^5 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s

% Computer : n034.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory   : 32218.75MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Jan 17 19:33:59 EST 2017

% Result   : CounterSatisfiable 23.63s
% Output   : FiniteModel 23.63s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL743^5 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.02/0.04  % Command  : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s
% 0.03/0.23  % Computer : n034.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.03/0.23  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.23  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.03/0.23  % Memory   : 32218.75MB
% 0.03/0.23  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% 0.03/0.23  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.23  % DateTime : Sat Jan 14 14:58:18 CST 2017
% 0.03/0.23  % CPUTime  : 
% 23.63/10.99  Nitpicking formula...
% 23.63/10.99  Timestamp: 14:58:27
% 23.63/10.99  The type bnd_a passed the monotonicity test; Nitpick might be able to skip
% 23.63/10.99  some scopes
% 23.63/10.99  Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured:
% 23.63/10.99  "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light"
% 23.63/10.99  Batch 1 of 20: Trying 5 scopes:
% 23.63/10.99    card bnd_a = 1
% 23.63/10.99    card bnd_a = 2
% 23.63/10.99    card bnd_a = 3
% 23.63/10.99    card bnd_a = 4
% 23.63/10.99    card bnd_a = 5
% 23.63/10.99  % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel
% 23.63/10.99  Nitpick found a counterexample for card bnd_a = 2:
% 23.63/10.99  
% 23.63/10.99    Constants:
% 23.63/10.99      bnd_cF = (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := False, b2 := True)
% 23.63/10.99      bnd_cJ =
% 23.63/10.99        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 23.63/10.99        ((\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := True, b2 := True) := b1,
% 23.63/10.99         (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := True, b2 := False) := b1,
% 23.63/10.99         (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := False, b2 := True) := b1,
% 23.63/10.99         (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := False, b2 := False) := b1)
% 23.63/10.99      bnd_cX = b2
% 23.63/10.99  % SZS output end FiniteModel
% 23.63/10.99  Total time: 1.3 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------