↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : LCL747-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:59:37 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 7.69s 1.47s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.69s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (  19 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   19 (  18 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    6 (   6   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   1 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   92 (  39 sgn  20   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(cls_ATP__Linkup_OCOMBB__def_0,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3,VAR_4,VAR_5] : hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBB(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2),VAR_3),VAR_4),VAR_5) = hAPP(VAR_3,hAPP(VAR_4,VAR_5)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cls_ATP__Linkup_OCOMBB__def_0) ).

cnf(c_272,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBB(A,B,C),D),E),F) = hAPP(D,hAPP(E,F)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cls_ATP__Linkup_OCOMBB__def_0]) ).

fof(cls_ATP__Linkup_OCOMBC__def_0,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3,VAR_4,VAR_5] : hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBC(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3),VAR_4),VAR_5) = hAPP(hAPP(VAR_0,VAR_5),VAR_4),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cls_ATP__Linkup_OCOMBC__def_0) ).

cnf(c_273,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBC(A,B,C,D),E),F) = hAPP(hAPP(A,F),E),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cls_ATP__Linkup_OCOMBC__def_0]) ).

fof(cls_ATP__Linkup_OCOMBS__def_0,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3,VAR_4,VAR_5] : hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3),VAR_4),VAR_5) = hAPP(hAPP(VAR_0,VAR_5),hAPP(VAR_4,VAR_5)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cls_ATP__Linkup_OCOMBS__def_0) ).

cnf(c_274,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(A,B,C,D),E),F) = hAPP(hAPP(A,F),hAPP(E,F)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cls_ATP__Linkup_OCOMBS__def_0]) ).

fof(cls_n__not__Suc__n_0,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] : VAR_0 != c_Suc(VAR_0),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cls_n__not__Suc__n_0) ).

cnf(c_429,plain,
    A != c_Suc(A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cls_n__not__Suc__n_0]) ).

cnf(c_430,plain,
    c_Suc(A) != A,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_429]) ).

fof(cls_Suc__eq__plus1__left_0,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] : c_Suc(VAR_0) = hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_nat),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat)),VAR_0),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cls_Suc__eq__plus1__left_0) ).

cnf(c_635,plain,
    c_Suc(A) = hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_nat),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat)),A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cls_Suc__eq__plus1__left_0]) ).

cnf(c_848,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_nat),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat)),A) != A,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_635,c_430]) ).

cnf(c_6023,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBB(A,B,C),D),hAPP(c_COMBC(E,F,V6,V7),V8)),V9) = hAPP(D,hAPP(hAPP(E,V9),V8)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_273,c_272]) ).

cnf(c_907,plain,
    hAPP(A,hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBC(B,C,D,E),F),V6)) = hAPP(A,hAPP(hAPP(B,V6),F)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_272,c_6023]) ).

cnf(c_909,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBC(hAPP(c_COMBB(A,B,C),D),E,F,V6),V7),V8) = hAPP(D,hAPP(V8,V7)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_273,c_272]) ).

cnf(c_5890,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_nat),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat)),hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBC(A,B,C,D),E),F)) != hAPP(hAPP(A,F),E),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_907,c_848]) ).

cnf(c_6021,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(c_COMBC(hAPP(c_COMBB(A,B,C),D),E,F,V6),V7,V8,V9),V10),V11) = hAPP(D,hAPP(hAPP(V10,V11),V11)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_909,c_274]) ).

cnf(c_6024,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(A,F),E) != hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_nat),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat)),hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBC(A,B,C,D),E),F)),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_5890]) ).

cnf(c_6022,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_6021,c_6024]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : LCL747-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.35  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 23:28:33 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.35  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.10/0.35  % Process 3988366 was started by sandbox on n019,
% 0.10/0.35  % Fri Sep 25 23:28:33 2026
% 0.10/0.35  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 7.69/1.47  
% 7.69/1.47  % given #500 (A,wt=100): 885 hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_lessequals(tc_nat),hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_nat),A),B)),hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_nat),C),D))) | -hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_lessequals(tc_nat),B),D)) | -hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBC(c_lessequals(tc_nat),E,F,V6),C),A)).  [para(273(a,2),228(c,1))].
% 7.69/1.47  
% 7.69/1.47  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 7.69/1.47  
% 7.69/1.47  % Proof 1 at 0.94 (+ 0.14) seconds.
% 7.69/1.47  % Length of proof is 12.
% 7.69/1.47  % Level of proof is 4.
% 7.69/1.47  % Maximum clause weight is 76.000.
% 7.69/1.47  % Given clauses 553.
% 7.69/1.47  
% 7.69/1.47  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------