↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : LCL748-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:08:16 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.97s 1.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.97s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   11 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   14 (   2 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    8 (   5   ~;   3   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   11 (   0 sgn  11   !;   0   ?;   7   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f420,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : c_Lambda_Olift(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(X0),X1) = c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(c_Lambda_Olift(X0,c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat),tc_nat))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_lift_Osimps_I3_J_0) ).

fof(f430,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(X0)
      | c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(X0)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Lambda_0) ).

fof(f435,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0] : c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Olift(v_r,X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

fof(f436,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Olift(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(v_r),v_ia)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

tcf(c_673,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(c_Lambda_Olift(X0,c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat),tc_nat))) = c_Lambda_Olift(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(X0),X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f420]) ).

tcf(c_680,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(X0))
      | ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f430]) ).

tcf(c_685,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Olift(v_r,X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f435]) ).

tcf(c_686,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Olift(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(v_r),v_ia)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f436]) ).

tcf(c_789,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Olift(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(X0),X1))
      | ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Olift(X0,c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat),tc_nat))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_673,c_680]) ).

tcf(c_873,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Olift(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(v_r),X0)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_685,c_789]) ).

tcf(c_875,plain,
    $false,
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_686,c_873]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : LCL748-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.20/0.45  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.20/0.45  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.20/0.45  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.20/0.45  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.20/0.45  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.20/0.45  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.20/0.45  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.20/0.45  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 00:31:06 UTC 2026
% 0.20/0.45  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.45  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.20/0.50  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.50  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/0.52  
% 0.27/0.52  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.27/0.52  
% 0.27/0.52  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.27/0.54  % Proving...
% 3.97/1.44  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.97/1.44  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.97/1.44  
% 3.97/1.44  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.97/1.44  
% 3.97/1.44  % ------  iProver source info
% 3.97/1.44  
% 3.97/1.44  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.97/1.44  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.97/1.44  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.97/1.44  
% 3.97/1.44  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 3.97/1.44  
% 3.97/1.44  
% 3.97/1.44  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 3.97/1.44  % ------ Proving...
% 3.97/1.44  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.97/1.44  
% 3.97/1.44  % 
% 3.97/1.44  % clauses                               293
% 3.97/1.44  % conjectures                           3
% 3.97/1.44  % EPR                                   43
% 3.97/1.44  % Horn                                  261
% 3.97/1.44  % unary                                 101
% 3.97/1.44  % binary                                129
% 3.97/1.44  % lits                                  570
% 3.97/1.44  % lits eq                               215
% 3.97/1.44  % fd_pure                               0
% 3.97/1.44  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 3.97/1.44  % fd_cond                               15
% 3.97/1.44  % fd_pseudo_cond                        28
% 3.97/1.44  % AC symbols                            0
% 3.97/1.44  
% 3.97/1.44  % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 3.97/1.44  
% 3.97/1.44  
% 3.97/1.44  % ------ 
% 3.97/1.44  % Current options:
% 3.97/1.44  % ------ 
% 3.97/1.44  
% 3.97/1.44  
% 3.97/1.44  % 
% 3.97/1.44  
% 3.97/1.44  % ------ Proving...
% 3.97/1.44  % 
% 3.97/1.44  
% 3.97/1.44  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.97/1.44  
% 3.97/1.44  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.97/1.44  
% 3.97/1.44  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------