↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : LCL755-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:08:17 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.41s 1.75s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.41s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   15 (   3 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    9 (   7   ~;   2   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   11 (   0 sgn  11   !;   0   ?;   5   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f35,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X0,X1,tc_nat) = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,X0,tc_nat),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_nat__add__commute_0) ).

fof(f115,axiom,
    ! [X0] : c_Suc(X0) = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat),X0,tc_nat),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Suc__eq__plus1__left_0) ).

fof(f845,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(X0)
      | c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(X0)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Lambda_0) ).

fof(f860,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] : c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Osubst(v_ra,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(X0),X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

fof(f861,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(c_Lambda_Osubst(v_ra,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_Suc(v_ia)),c_Suc(v_ja)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

fof(f995,plain,
    ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(c_Lambda_Osubst(v_ra,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat),v_ia,tc_nat)),c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat),v_ja,tc_nat)))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f861,f115,f115]) ).

tcf(c_831,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X0,X1,tc_nat) = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,X0,tc_nat),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f35]) ).

tcf(c_1390,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(X0))
      | ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f845]) ).

tcf(c_1404,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Osubst(v_ra,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(X0),X1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f860]) ).

tcf(c_1405,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(c_Lambda_Osubst(v_ra,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat),v_ia,tc_nat)),c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat),v_ja,tc_nat)))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f995]) ).

tcf(c_1838,plain,
    ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(c_Lambda_Osubst(v_ra,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(v_ia,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat),tc_nat)),c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(v_ja,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat),tc_nat)))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1405,c_831]) ).

tcf(c_1839,plain,
    ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Osubst(v_ra,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(v_ia,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat),tc_nat)),c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(v_ja,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat),tc_nat))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1390,c_1838]) ).

tcf(c_5301,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1839,c_1404]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : LCL755-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.18/0.41  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.41  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.41  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.41  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.41  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.42  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.42  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.18/0.42  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 00:31:52 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.42  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.42  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.18/0.46  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.46  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.47  
% 0.18/0.47  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.18/0.47  
% 0.18/0.47  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.18/0.48  % Proving...
% 3.41/1.75  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.41/1.75  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.41/1.75  
% 3.41/1.75  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.41/1.75  
% 3.41/1.75  % ------  iProver source info
% 3.41/1.75  
% 3.41/1.75  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.41/1.75  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.41/1.75  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.41/1.75  
% 3.41/1.75  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 3.41/1.75  
% 3.41/1.75  
% 3.41/1.75  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 3.41/1.75  % ------ Proving...
% 3.41/1.75  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.41/1.75  
% 3.41/1.75  % 
% 3.41/1.75  % clauses                               632
% 3.41/1.75  % conjectures                           3
% 3.41/1.75  % EPR                                   89
% 3.41/1.75  % Horn                                  566
% 3.41/1.75  % unary                                 147
% 3.41/1.75  % binary                                254
% 3.41/1.75  % lits                                  1461
% 3.41/1.75  % lits eq                               383
% 3.41/1.75  % fd_pure                               0
% 3.41/1.75  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 3.41/1.75  % fd_cond                               25
% 3.41/1.75  % fd_pseudo_cond                        56
% 3.41/1.75  % AC symbols                            0
% 3.41/1.75  
% 3.41/1.75  % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 3.41/1.75  
% 3.41/1.75  
% 3.41/1.75  % ------ 
% 3.41/1.75  % Current options:
% 3.41/1.75  % ------ 
% 3.41/1.75  
% 3.41/1.75  
% 3.41/1.75  % 
% 3.41/1.75  
% 3.41/1.75  % ------ Proving...
% 3.41/1.75  % 
% 3.41/1.75  
% 3.41/1.75  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.41/1.75  
% 3.41/1.75  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.41/1.75  
% 3.41/1.75  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------