↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : LCL755_5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v6.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 11:36:34 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 10.37s 10.65s
% Output   : Proof 10.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem    : LCL755_5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v6.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.11/0.36  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % DateTime   : Sat Sep  5 06:54:36 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37  % CPUTime    : 
% 10.37/10.65  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 10.37/10.65  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 10.37/10.65  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (R : dB), it R → it (abs R)) True
% 10.37/10.65  Clause #108 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (I J : nat), it (subst ra (var I) J)) True
% 10.37/10.65  Clause #109 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (it (abs (subst ra (var (suc ia)) (suc ja))))) True
% 10.37/10.65  Clause #110 (by clausification #[0]): ∀ (a : dB), Eq (it a → it (abs a)) True
% 10.37/10.65  Clause #111 (by clausification #[110]): ∀ (a : dB), Or (Eq (it a) False) (Eq (it (abs a)) True)
% 10.37/10.65  Clause #235 (by clausification #[108]): ∀ (a : nat), Eq (∀ (J : nat), it (subst ra (var a) J)) True
% 10.37/10.65  Clause #236 (by clausification #[235]): ∀ (a a_1 : nat), Eq (it (subst ra (var a) a_1)) True
% 10.37/10.65  Clause #237 (by superposition #[236, 111]): ∀ (a a_1 : nat), Or (Eq True False) (Eq (it (abs (subst ra (var a) a_1))) True)
% 10.37/10.65  Clause #296 (by clausification #[237]): ∀ (a a_1 : nat), Eq (it (abs (subst ra (var a) a_1))) True
% 10.37/10.65  Clause #558 (by clausification #[109]): Eq (it (abs (subst ra (var (suc ia)) (suc ja)))) False
% 10.37/10.65  Clause #559 (by superposition #[558, 296]): Eq False True
% 10.37/10.65  Clause #576 (by clausification #[559]): False
% 10.37/10.65  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------