↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : LCL760-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:59:40 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.79s 0.63s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.79s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    5 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    5 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    2 (   2   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   18 (  18 usr;  10 con; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   0 sgn   2   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(cls_conjecture_4,axiom,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Osubst,hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_ra),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_Suc(v_ia))),c_Suc(v_ja))),hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_s),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_ia)),v_ja)),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_ia),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_ja,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_ss,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).

cnf(c_342,plain,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Osubst,hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_ra),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_Suc(v_ia))),c_Suc(v_ja))),hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_s),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_ia)),v_ja)),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_ia),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_ja,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_ss,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_4]) ).

fof(cls_conjecture_1,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : hBOOL(hAPP(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Osubst,hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_ra),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_Suc(VAR_0))),c_Suc(VAR_1))),hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_s),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(VAR_0)),VAR_1)),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(VAR_0),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),VAR_1,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_ss,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(c_345,plain,
    hBOOL(hAPP(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Osubst,hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_ra),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_Suc(A))),c_Suc(B))),hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_s),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(A)),B)),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(A),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),B,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_ss,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_1]) ).

cnf(c_346,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_345,c_342]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL760-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 23:30:26 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.38  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.11/0.38  % Process 4018183 was started by sandbox2 on n006,
% 0.11/0.38  % Fri Sep 25 23:30:26 2026
% 0.11/0.38  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.11/0.40  
% 0.11/0.40  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 1.79/0.63  
% 1.79/0.63  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 1.79/0.63  
% 1.79/0.63  % Proof 1 at 0.22 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 1.79/0.63  % Length of proof is 3.
% 1.79/0.63  % Level of proof is 1.
% 1.79/0.63  % Maximum clause weight is 99.000.
% 1.79/0.63  % Given clauses 0.
% 1.79/0.63  
% 1.79/0.63  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------