↑ Up

Etableau---0.67.UNS-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : LCL762-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 12:01:56 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.10s 0.42s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL762-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Sep  5 05:17:58 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.42  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.10/0.42  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S0Y
% 0.10/0.42  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 0.10/0.42  #
% 0.10/0.42  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  # Proof found!
% 0.10/0.42  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.10/0.42  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.10/0.42  cnf(cls_conjecture_0, negated_conjecture, (hBOOL(hAPP(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n),c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cls_conjecture_0)).
% 0.10/0.42  cnf(cls_Var__eq__apps__conv_2, axiom, (c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(X1)=c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(X1),c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cls_Var__eq__apps__conv_2)).
% 0.10/0.42  cnf(cls_conjecture_1, negated_conjecture, (~hBOOL(hAPP(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cls_conjecture_1)).
% 0.10/0.42  cnf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, (hBOOL(hAPP(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n),c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB)))), cls_conjecture_0).
% 0.10/0.42  cnf(c_0_4, axiom, (c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(X1)=c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(X1),c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB)), cls_Var__eq__apps__conv_2).
% 0.10/0.42  cnf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, (~hBOOL(hAPP(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n)))), cls_conjecture_1).
% 0.10/0.42  cnf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4]), c_0_5]), ['proof']).
% 0.10/0.42  # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.10/0.42  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------