↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : LCL786-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:16:25 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 67.82s 10.33s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 67.82s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   26 (  14 unt;   0 nHn;  24 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   42 (   4 equ;  21 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   2 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   20 (  20 usr;  11 con; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   43 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_that_0,axiom,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n____)),v_a____)),c_List_Ofoldr(c_Type_Otype_OFun,X1,v_T_H____,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype)))
    | ~ c_Type_Otypings(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_as____,X1)
    | v_thesis____ ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_that_0) ).

cnf(cls_foldr__foldl_0,axiom,
    c_List_Ofoldr(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5) = c_List_Ofoldl(c_COMBC(X1,X4,X5,X5),X3,c_List_Orev(X2,X4),X5,X4),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_foldr__foldl_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v_thesis____,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_list__app__typeD_1,axiom,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otyping(X1),c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,X4,X2,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB)),X3))
    | c_Type_Otypings(X1,X2,c_Type_Osko__Type__Xlist__app__typeD__1__1(X3,X1,X4,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_list__app__typeD_1) ).

cnf(cls_CHAINED_0,axiom,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype)),c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n____)),v_a____),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_T_H____)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).

cnf(cls_True_0,axiom,
    v_n____ = v_i____,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_True_0) ).

cnf(cls_list__app__typeD_0,axiom,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otyping(X1),c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,X2,X4,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB)),X3))
    | hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otyping(X1),X2),c_List_Ofoldr(c_Type_Otype_OFun,c_Type_Osko__Type__Xlist__app__typeD__1__1(X3,X1,X2,X4),X3,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_list__app__typeD_0) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n____)),v_a____)),c_List_Ofoldr(c_Type_Otype_OFun,X1,v_T_H____,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype)))
    | ~ c_Type_Otypings(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_as____,X1)
    | v_thesis____ ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_that_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n____)),v_a____)),c_List_Ofoldr(c_Type_Otype_OFun,X1,v_T_H____,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype)))
    | ~ c_Type_Otypings(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_as____,X1)
    | v_thesis____ ),
    c_0_7 ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    c_List_Ofoldr(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5) = c_List_Ofoldl(c_COMBC(X1,X4,X5,X5),X3,c_List_Orev(X2,X4),X5,X4),
    cls_foldr__foldl_0 ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v_thesis____,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otyping(X1),c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,X4,X2,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB)),X3))
    | c_Type_Otypings(X1,X2,c_Type_Osko__Type__Xlist__app__typeD__1__1(X3,X1,X4,X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_list__app__typeD_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype)),c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n____)),v_a____),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_T_H____)),
    cls_CHAINED_0 ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    v_n____ = v_i____,
    cls_True_0 ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otyping(X1),c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,X2,X4,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB)),X3))
    | hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otyping(X1),X2),c_List_Ofoldr(c_Type_Otype_OFun,c_Type_Osko__Type__Xlist__app__typeD__1__1(X3,X1,X2,X4),X3,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype))) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_list__app__typeD_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n____)),v_a____)),c_List_Ofoldl(c_COMBC(c_Type_Otype_OFun,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype),v_T_H____,c_List_Orev(X1,tc_Type_Otype),tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype)))
    | ~ c_Type_Otypings(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_as____,X1)
    | v_thesis____ ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v_thesis____,
    c_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otyping(X1),c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,X4,X2,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB)),X3))
    | c_Type_Otypings(X1,X2,c_Type_Osko__Type__Xlist__app__typeD__1__1(X3,X1,X4,X2)) ),
    c_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_n____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype)),c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n____)),v_a____),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_T_H____)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otyping(X1),c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,X2,X4,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB)),X3))
    | hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otyping(X1),X2),c_List_Ofoldr(c_Type_Otype_OFun,c_Type_Osko__Type__Xlist__app__typeD__1__1(X3,X1,X2,X4),X3,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype))) ),
    c_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_n____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n____)),v_a____)),c_List_Ofoldl(c_COMBC(c_Type_Otype_OFun,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype),v_T_H____,c_List_Orev(X1,tc_Type_Otype),tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype)))
    | ~ c_Type_Otypings(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_n____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_as____,X1) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_13]),c_0_13]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    c_Type_Otypings(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_n____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_as____,c_Type_Osko__Type__Xlist__app__typeD__1__1(v_T_H____,c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_n____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n____)),v_a____),v_as____)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otyping(X1),c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,X2,X4,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB)),X3))
    | hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otyping(X1),X2),c_List_Ofoldl(c_COMBC(c_Type_Otype_OFun,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype),X3,c_List_Orev(c_Type_Osko__Type__Xlist__app__typeD__1__1(X3,X1,X2,X4),tc_Type_Otype),tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype))) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_n____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n____)),v_a____)),c_List_Ofoldl(c_COMBC(c_Type_Otype_OFun,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype),v_T_H____,c_List_Orev(c_Type_Osko__Type__Xlist__app__typeD__1__1(v_T_H____,c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_n____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n____)),v_a____),v_as____),tc_Type_Otype),tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_n____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n____)),v_a____)),c_List_Ofoldl(c_COMBC(c_Type_Otype_OFun,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype),v_T_H____,c_List_Orev(c_Type_Osko__Type__Xlist__app__typeD__1__1(v_T_H____,c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_n____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n____)),v_a____),v_as____),tc_Type_Otype),tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cdclpropres,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL786-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:08:53 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 67.82/10.33  % Version: 3.5.1
% 67.82/10.33  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 67.82/10.33  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 67.82/10.33  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 67.82/10.33  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 67.82/10.33  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 67.82/10.33  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 67.82/10.33  % G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with pid 1240540 completed with status 0
% 67.82/10.33  % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S
% 67.82/10.33  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 67.82/10.33  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 67.82/10.33  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 67.82/10.33  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 67.82/10.33  % No SInE strategy applied
% 67.82/10.33  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 67.82/10.33  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 4 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
% 67.82/10.33  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 109s (1) cores
% 67.82/10.33  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 121s (1) cores
% 67.82/10.33  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 90s (1) cores
% 67.82/10.33  % Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 90s (1) cores
% 67.82/10.33  % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 1240550 completed with status 0
% 67.82/10.33  % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 67.82/10.33  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 67.82/10.33  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 67.82/10.33  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 67.82/10.33  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 67.82/10.33  % No SInE strategy applied
% 67.82/10.33  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 67.82/10.33  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 4 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
% 67.82/10.33  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 109s (1) cores
% 67.82/10.33  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 121s (1) cores
% 67.82/10.33  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 90s (1) cores
% 67.82/10.33  % Preprocessing time       : 0.008 s
% 67.82/10.33  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 67.82/10.33  % SatCheck found unsatisfiable ground set
% 67.82/10.33  
% 67.82/10.33  % Proof found!
% 67.82/10.33  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 67.82/10.33  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 67.82/10.33  % Parsed axioms                        : 497
% 67.82/10.33  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 67.82/10.33  % Initial clauses                      : 497
% 67.82/10.33  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 67.82/10.33  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 495
% 67.82/10.33  % Processed clauses                    : 27620
% 67.82/10.33  % ...of these trivial                  : 407
% 67.82/10.33  % ...subsumed                          : 22213
% 67.82/10.33  % ...remaining for further processing  : 5000
% 67.82/10.33  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1171
% 67.82/10.33  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 67.82/10.33  % Backward-subsumed                    : 211
% 67.82/10.33  % Backward-rewritten                   : 132
% 67.82/10.33  % Generated clauses                    : 336470
% 67.82/10.33  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 321090
% 67.82/10.33  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 67.82/10.33  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 3
% 67.82/10.33  % Paramodulations                      : 335168
% 67.82/10.33  % Factorizations                       : 14
% 67.82/10.33  % NegExts                              : 0
% 67.82/10.33  % Equation resolutions                 : 1288
% 67.82/10.33  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 67.82/10.33  % Total rewrite steps                  : 178138
% 67.82/10.33  % ...of those cached                   : 164349
% 67.82/10.33  % Propositional unsat checks           : 1
% 67.82/10.33  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 67.82/10.33  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 1
% 67.82/10.33  %    Propositional clauses             : 298142
% 67.82/10.33  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 28834
% 67.82/10.33  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 2
% 67.82/10.33  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 67.82/10.33  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.976
% 67.82/10.33  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.062
% 67.82/10.33  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 67.82/10.33  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.976
% 67.82/10.33  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.062
% 67.82/10.33  % Current number of processed clauses  : 4280
% 67.82/10.33  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 474
% 67.82/10.33  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 118
% 67.82/10.33  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1412
% 67.82/10.33  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2276
% 67.82/10.33  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 293862
% 67.82/10.33  % ...number of literals in the above   : 796320
% 67.82/10.33  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 67.82/10.33  % Current number of archived clauses   : 722
% 67.82/10.33  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 819210
% 67.82/10.33  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 634083
% 67.82/10.33  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 7342
% 67.82/10.33  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 615607
% 67.82/10.33  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 1350
% 67.82/10.33  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 7708
% 67.82/10.33  % BW rewrite match successes           : 547
% 67.82/10.33  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 67.82/10.33  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 67.82/10.33  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 11664970
% 67.82/10.33  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 784
% 67.82/10.33  
% 67.82/10.33  % -------------------------------------------------
% 67.82/10.33  % User time                : 9.175 s
% 67.82/10.33  % System time              : 0.348 s
% 67.82/10.33  % Total time               : 9.523 s
% 67.82/10.33  % Maximum resident set size: 4488 pages
% 67.82/10.33  
% 67.82/10.33  % -------------------------------------------------
% 67.82/10.33  % User time                : 36.951 s
% 67.82/10.33  % System time              : 1.302 s
% 67.82/10.33  % Total time               : 38.253 s
% 67.82/10.33  % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 67.82/10.33  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------