%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem : LCL786-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satcop --statistics %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep 7 01:04:36 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.08s 0.37s
% Output : Proof 0.08s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
~ v_thesis____,
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0)]) ).
cnf(g1,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n____)),v_a____)),c_List_Ofoldr(c_Type_Otype_OFun,c_Type_Osko__Type__Xlist__app__typeD__1__1(v_T_H____,c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n____)),v_a____),v_as____),v_T_H____,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype)))
| ~ c_Type_Otypings(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_as____,c_Type_Osko__Type__Xlist__app__typeD__1__1(v_T_H____,c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n____)),v_a____),v_as____))
| v_thesis____ ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_that_0)]) ).
cnf(g2,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype)),c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n____)),v_a____),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_T_H____))
| hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n____)),v_a____)),c_List_Ofoldr(c_Type_Otype_OFun,c_Type_Osko__Type__Xlist__app__typeD__1__1(v_T_H____,c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n____)),v_a____),v_as____),v_T_H____,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_list__app__typeD_0)]) ).
cnf(g3,plain,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype)),c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n____)),v_a____),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_T_H____)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0)]) ).
cnf(g4,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype)),c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n____)),v_a____),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_T_H____))
| c_Type_Otypings(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_as____,c_Type_Osko__Type__Xlist__app__typeD__1__1(v_T_H____,c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(v_n____)),v_a____),v_as____)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_list__app__typeD_1)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : LCL786-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.08/0.36 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36 % DateTime : Fri Sep 4 23:30:03 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.37 % symbols: 103
% 0.08/0.37 % clauses: 576
% 0.08/0.37 % start clauses: 1
% 0.08/0.37 % iterative deepening steps: 41
% 0.08/0.37 % maximum path limit: 3
% 0.08/0.37 % literal attempts: 1372
% 0.08/0.37 % depth failures: 1194
% 0.08/0.37 % regularity failures: 14
% 0.08/0.37 % tautology failures: 8
% 0.08/0.37 % reductions: 17
% 0.08/0.37 % extensions: 1324
% 0.08/0.37 % SAT variables: 1527
% 0.08/0.37 % SAT clauses: 1244
% 0.08/0.37 % WalkSAT solutions: 1239
% 0.08/0.37 % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.08/0.37 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.08/0.37 % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------