%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : LCL796-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:23:22 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.24s 0.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR)
% Number of literals : 9 ( 2 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 4 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),v_T_H_H____,tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),v_T_H_H____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_typing_OVar_0,axiom,
c_Type_Otyping(X1,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(X2),hAPP(X1,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_typing_OVar_0) ).
cnf(cls_shift__eq_0,axiom,
hAPP(c_Type_Oshift(X1,X2,X3,X4),X2) = X3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_shift__eq_0) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),v_T_H_H____,tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),v_T_H_H____),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
c_Type_Otyping(X1,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(X2),hAPP(X1,X2)),
cls_typing_OVar_0 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
hAPP(c_Type_Oshift(X1,X2,X3,X4),X2) = X3,
cls_shift__eq_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),v_T_H_H____,tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),v_T_H_H____),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(X1,X2,X3,X4),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(X2),X3),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : LCL796-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:07:51 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/0.48 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.24/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.48 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.48 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.48 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.48 % new_bool_3 with pid 1031066 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.48 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.24/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.48 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.48 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.24/0.48 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.24/0.48 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.48 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.24/0.48 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.48 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1031074 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.48 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.24/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.48 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.48 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.24/0.48 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.24/0.48 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.48 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.24/0.48 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.48 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.24/0.48
% 0.24/0.48 % Proof found!
% 0.24/0.48 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.24/0.48 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/0.48 % Parsed axioms : 1016
% 0.24/0.48 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 694
% 0.24/0.48 % Initial clauses : 322
% 0.24/0.48 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.24/0.48 % Initial clauses in saturation : 322
% 0.24/0.48 % Processed clauses : 746
% 0.24/0.48 % ...of these trivial : 55
% 0.24/0.48 % ...subsumed : 487
% 0.24/0.48 % ...remaining for further processing : 203
% 0.24/0.48 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 6
% 0.24/0.48 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/0.48 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.24/0.48 % Backward-rewritten : 8
% 0.24/0.48 % Generated clauses : 1815
% 0.24/0.48 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1384
% 0.24/0.48 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.24/0.48 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.24/0.48 % Paramodulations : 1790
% 0.24/0.48 % Factorizations : 8
% 0.24/0.48 % NegExts : 0
% 0.24/0.48 % Equation resolutions : 17
% 0.24/0.48 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.24/0.48 % Total rewrite steps : 658
% 0.24/0.48 % ...of those cached : 550
% 0.24/0.48 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.24/0.48 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.24/0.48 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.24/0.48 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.24/0.48 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.24/0.48 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.24/0.48 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.48 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.48 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.48 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.48 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.48 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.48 % Current number of processed clauses : 195
% 0.24/0.48 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 55
% 0.24/0.48 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.24/0.48 % Negative unit clauses : 33
% 0.24/0.48 % Non-unit-clauses : 105
% 0.24/0.48 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 943
% 0.24/0.48 % ...number of literals in the above : 1771
% 0.24/0.48 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/0.48 % Current number of archived clauses : 8
% 0.24/0.48 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3228
% 0.24/0.48 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3071
% 0.24/0.48 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 236
% 0.24/0.48 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 225
% 0.24/0.48 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/0.48 % BW rewrite match attempts : 54
% 0.24/0.48 % BW rewrite match successes : 21
% 0.24/0.48 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/0.48 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/0.48 % Termbank termtop insertions : 37492
% 0.24/0.48 % Search garbage collected termcells : 3136
% 0.24/0.48
% 0.24/0.48 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.48 % User time : 0.022 s
% 0.24/0.48 % System time : 0.008 s
% 0.24/0.48 % Total time : 0.030 s
% 0.24/0.48 % Maximum resident set size: 4616 pages
% 0.24/0.48
% 0.24/0.48 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.48 % User time : 0.049 s
% 0.24/0.48 % System time : 0.016 s
% 0.24/0.48 % Total time : 0.065 s
% 0.24/0.48 % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 0.24/0.48 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------