↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : LCL812-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:08:27 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 7.06s 1.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.06s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    8 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   10 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    7 (   5   ~;   2   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   16 (  16 usr;   9 con; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   0 sgn   4   !;   0   ?;   2   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f709,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ c_List_Olistsp(c_InductTermi_OIT,X1,tc_Lambda_OdB)
      | hBOOL(hAPP(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(X0),X1,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_IT_OVar_0) ).

fof(f735,axiom,
    c_List_Olistsp(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Olift,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_u____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_i____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).

fof(f736,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Olift,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_u____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_i____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

tcf(c_702,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Olift,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_u____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_i____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f736]) ).

tcf(c_812,plain,
    c_List_Olistsp(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Olift,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_u____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_i____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f735]) ).

tcf(c_955,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( hBOOL(hAPP(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(X1),X0,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB)))
      | ~ c_List_Olistsp(c_InductTermi_OIT,X0,tc_Lambda_OdB) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f709]) ).

tcf(c_15384,plain,
    ~ c_List_Olistsp(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Olift,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_u____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_i____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_955,c_702]) ).

tcf(c_15385,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_15384,c_812]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL812-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 00:30:08 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.36  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.14/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.41  
% 0.14/0.41  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.14/0.41  
% 0.14/0.41  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.14/0.42  % Proving...
% 7.06/1.72  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 7.06/1.72  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 7.06/1.72  
% 7.06/1.72  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 7.06/1.72  
% 7.06/1.72  % ------  iProver source info
% 7.06/1.72  
% 7.06/1.72  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 7.06/1.72  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 7.06/1.72  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 7.06/1.72  
% 7.06/1.72  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 7.06/1.72  
% 7.06/1.72  
% 7.06/1.72  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 7.06/1.72  
% 7.06/1.72  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 23  sf_s  rm: 4 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 3 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 7.06/1.72  
% 7.06/1.72  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 7.06/1.72  
% 7.06/1.72  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 7.06/1.72  % ------ Proving...
% 7.06/1.72  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 7.06/1.72  
% 7.06/1.72  % 
% 7.06/1.72  % clauses                               283
% 7.06/1.72  % conjectures                           1
% 7.06/1.72  % EPR                                   27
% 7.06/1.72  % Horn                                  248
% 7.06/1.72  % unary                                 85
% 7.06/1.72  % binary                                111
% 7.06/1.72  % lits                                  601
% 7.06/1.72  % lits eq                               197
% 7.06/1.72  % fd_pure                               0
% 7.06/1.72  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 7.06/1.72  % fd_cond                               12
% 7.06/1.72  % fd_pseudo_cond                        50
% 7.06/1.72  % AC symbols                            0
% 7.06/1.72  
% 7.06/1.72  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 7.06/1.72  
% 7.06/1.72  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 7.06/1.72  
% 7.06/1.72  
% 7.06/1.72  % ------ 
% 7.06/1.72  % Current options:
% 7.06/1.72  % ------ 
% 7.06/1.72  
% 7.06/1.72  
% 7.06/1.72  % 
% 7.06/1.72  
% 7.06/1.72  % ------ Proving...
% 7.06/1.72  % 
% 7.06/1.72  
% 7.06/1.72  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 7.06/1.72  
% 7.06/1.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 7.06/1.72  
% 7.06/1.72  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------