↑ Up

CSI_E---1.1.UNS-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSI_E---1.1
% Problem  : LCL814-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 11:21:45 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.77s 0.72s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem    : LCL814-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command    : java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.08/0.35  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime   : Sat Sep  5 02:13:42 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.12/0.43  start to proof:theBenchmark.p
% 1.77/0.72  % Version  : CSI_E---1.1
% 1.77/0.72  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.77/0.72  % Proof found!
% 1.77/0.72  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.77/0.72  % SZS output start Proof
% 1.77/0.72  cnf(cls_substs__lemma_0, axiom, (c_Type_Otypings(X1,c_List_Omap(hAPP(c_COMBC(hAPP(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),X2),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),X3),X4,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),X5)|~c_Type_Otypings(c_Type_Oshift(X1,X3,X6,tc_Type_Otype),X4,X5)|~c_Type_Otyping(X1,X2,X6)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cls_substs__lemma_0)).
% 1.77/0.72  cnf(cls_argsT_0, axiom, (c_Type_Otypings(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_as____,v_Ts____)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cls_argsT_0)).
% 1.77/0.72  cnf(cls_conjecture_0, negated_conjecture, (~c_Type_Otypings(v_e____,c_List_Omap(hAPP(c_COMBC(hAPP(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_u____),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_i____),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_Ts____)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cls_conjecture_0)).
% 1.77/0.72  cnf(cls_uT_0, axiom, (c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,v_u____,v_T____)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cls_uT_0)).
% 1.77/0.72  cnf(c_0_4, plain, (c_Type_Otypings(X1,c_List_Omap(hAPP(c_COMBC(hAPP(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),X2),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),X3),X4,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),X5)|~c_Type_Otypings(c_Type_Oshift(X1,X3,X6,tc_Type_Otype),X4,X5)|~c_Type_Otyping(X1,X2,X6)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_substs__lemma_0])).
% 1.77/0.72  cnf(c_0_5, plain, (c_Type_Otypings(X1,c_List_Omap(hAPP(c_COMBC(hAPP(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),X2),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),X3),X4,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),X5)|~c_Type_Otypings(c_Type_Oshift(X1,X3,X6,tc_Type_Otype),X4,X5)|~c_Type_Otyping(X1,X2,X6)), c_0_4).
% 1.77/0.72  cnf(c_0_6, axiom, (c_Type_Otypings(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_as____,v_Ts____)), cls_argsT_0).
% 1.77/0.72  cnf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, (~c_Type_Otypings(v_e____,c_List_Omap(hAPP(c_COMBC(hAPP(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_u____),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_i____),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_Ts____)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0])).
% 1.77/0.72  cnf(c_0_8, plain, (c_Type_Otypings(v_e____,c_List_Omap(hAPP(c_COMBC(hAPP(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),X1),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_i____),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_Ts____)|~c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,X1,v_T____)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_6])).
% 1.77/0.72  cnf(c_0_9, axiom, (c_Type_Otyping(v_e____,v_u____,v_T____)), cls_uT_0).
% 1.77/0.72  cnf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, (~c_Type_Otypings(v_e____,c_List_Omap(hAPP(c_COMBC(hAPP(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_u____),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_i____),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_Ts____)), c_0_7).
% 1.77/0.72  cnf(c_0_11, plain, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9]), c_0_10]), ['proof']).
% 1.77/0.72  % SZS output end Proof
% 1.77/0.72  % User time                : 0.179 s
% 1.77/0.72  % System time              : 0.013 s
% 1.77/0.72  % Total time               : 0.193 s
% 1.77/0.72  % User time                : 0.717 s
% 1.77/0.72  % System time              : 0.054 s
% 1.77/0.72  % Total time               : 0.771 s
% 1.77/0.72  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------