↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : LCL815-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:08:28 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 7.16s 1.74s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   12 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   14 (   2 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    8 (   6   ~;   2   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   20 (  20 usr;  13 con; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (   0 sgn  10   !;   0   ?;   5   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f929,axiom,
    v_n____ = v_i____,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_True_0) ).

fof(f930,plain,
    v_i____ = v_n____,
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f929]) ).

fof(f962,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4] :
      ( ~ c_Type_Otypings(X0,X3,X4)
      | c_Type_Otypings(c_Type_Oshift(X0,X1,X2,tc_Type_Otype),c_List_Omap(hAPP(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Olift,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),X1),X3,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_lift__types_0) ).

fof(f964,axiom,
    c_Type_Otypings(v_e____,c_List_Omap(hAPP(c_COMBC(hAPP(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_u____),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_i____),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_Ts____),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).

fof(f965,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Type_Otypings(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),c_List_Ofoldr(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ts____,v_T_H____,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype),tc_Type_Otype),c_List_Omap(hAPP(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Olift,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_List_Omap(hAPP(c_COMBC(hAPP(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_u____),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_i____),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_Ts____),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

fof(f1133,plain,
    c_Type_Otypings(v_e____,c_List_Omap(hAPP(c_COMBC(hAPP(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_u____),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_n____),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_Ts____),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f964,f930]) ).

fof(f1134,plain,
    ~ c_Type_Otypings(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),c_List_Ofoldr(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ts____,v_T_H____,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype),tc_Type_Otype),c_List_Omap(hAPP(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Olift,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_List_Omap(hAPP(c_COMBC(hAPP(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_u____),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_n____),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_Ts____),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f965,f930]) ).

tcf(c_1561,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i] :
      ( c_Type_Otypings(c_Type_Oshift(X0,X3,X4,tc_Type_Otype),c_List_Omap(hAPP(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Olift,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),X3),X1,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),X2)
      | ~ c_Type_Otypings(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f962]) ).

tcf(c_1563,plain,
    c_Type_Otypings(v_e____,c_List_Omap(hAPP(c_COMBC(hAPP(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_u____),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_n____),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_Ts____),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1133]) ).

tcf(c_1564,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Type_Otypings(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),c_List_Ofoldr(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ts____,v_T_H____,tc_Type_Otype,tc_Type_Otype),tc_Type_Otype),c_List_Omap(hAPP(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Olift,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_List_Omap(hAPP(c_COMBC(hAPP(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_u____),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_n____),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_Ts____),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1134]) ).

tcf(c_2577,plain,
    ~ c_Type_Otypings(v_e____,c_List_Omap(hAPP(c_COMBC(hAPP(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_u____),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_n____),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_Ts____),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1561,c_1564]) ).

tcf(c_2578,plain,
    $false,
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1563,c_2577]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL815-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.12/0.36  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 00:33:24 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.16/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.42  
% 0.16/0.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.16/0.42  
% 0.16/0.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.16/0.44  % Proving...
% 7.16/1.74  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 7.16/1.74  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 7.16/1.74  
% 7.16/1.74  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 7.16/1.74  
% 7.16/1.74  % ------  iProver source info
% 7.16/1.74  
% 7.16/1.74  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 7.16/1.74  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 7.16/1.74  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 7.16/1.74  
% 7.16/1.74  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 7.16/1.74  
% 7.16/1.74  
% 7.16/1.74  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 7.16/1.74  % ------ Proving...
% 7.16/1.74  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 7.16/1.74  
% 7.16/1.74  % 
% 7.16/1.74  % clauses                               729
% 7.16/1.74  % conjectures                           1
% 7.16/1.74  % EPR                                   86
% 7.16/1.74  % Horn                                  658
% 7.16/1.74  % unary                                 253
% 7.16/1.74  % binary                                272
% 7.16/1.74  % lits                                  1512
% 7.16/1.74  % lits eq                               533
% 7.16/1.74  % fd_pure                               0
% 7.16/1.74  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 7.16/1.74  % fd_cond                               22
% 7.16/1.74  % fd_pseudo_cond                        97
% 7.16/1.74  % AC symbols                            0
% 7.16/1.74  
% 7.16/1.74  % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 7.16/1.74  
% 7.16/1.74  
% 7.16/1.74  % ------ 
% 7.16/1.74  % Current options:
% 7.16/1.74  % ------ 
% 7.16/1.74  
% 7.16/1.74  
% 7.16/1.74  % 
% 7.16/1.74  
% 7.16/1.74  % ------ Proving...
% 7.16/1.74  % 
% 7.16/1.74  
% 7.16/1.74  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 7.16/1.74  
% 7.16/1.74  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 7.16/1.74  
% 7.16/1.74  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------