↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : LCL830-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:08:31 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.80s 1.29s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.80s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   12 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   12 (   6 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    2 (   2   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   13 (  13 usr;   8 con; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   44 (   0 sgn  44   !;   0   ?;  33   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f567,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4] : c_List_Omap(X0,c_List_Olist_OCons(X1,X2,X3),X3,X4) = c_List_Olist_OCons(hAPP(X0,X1),c_List_Omap(X0,X2,X3,X4),X4),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_map_Osimps_I2_J_0) ).

fof(f572,axiom,
    c_List_Olistsp(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Olist_OCons(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_a____),v_u____),v_i____),c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_u____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_i____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).

fof(f573,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_List_Olistsp(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_u____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_i____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),c_List_Olist_OCons(v_a____,v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

fof(f601,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4,X5] : hAPP(c_COMBC(X0,X1,X2,X3,X4),X5) = hAPP(hAPP(X0,X5),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_ATP__Linkup_OCOMBC__def_0) ).

tcf(c_975,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i] : c_List_Olist_OCons(hAPP(X0,X1),c_List_Omap(X0,X2,X3,X4),X4) = c_List_Omap(X0,c_List_Olist_OCons(X1,X2,X3),X3,X4),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f567]) ).

tcf(c_979,plain,
    c_List_Olistsp(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Olist_OCons(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_a____),v_u____),v_i____),c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_u____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_i____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f572]) ).

tcf(c_980,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_List_Olistsp(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_u____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_i____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),c_List_Olist_OCons(v_a____,v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f573]) ).

tcf(c_1008,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i] : hAPP(c_COMBC(X0,X1,X2,X3,X4),X5) = hAPP(hAPP(X0,X5),X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f601]) ).

tcf(c_1178,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i,X6: $i,X7: $i,X8: $i] : c_List_Olist_OCons(hAPP(hAPP(X0,X1),X2),c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(X0,X2,X3,X4,X5),X6,X7,X8),X8) = c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(X0,X2,X3,X4,X5),c_List_Olist_OCons(X1,X6,X7),X7,X8),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1008,c_975]) ).

tcf(c_2388,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i,X6: $i,X7: $i,X8: $i,X9: $i,X10: $i,X11: $i,X12: $i] : c_List_Olist_OCons(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(X0,X1),X2),X3),c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_COMBC(X0,X2,X4,X5,X6),X3,X7,X8,X9),X10,X11,X12),X12) = c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_COMBC(X0,X2,X4,X5,X6),X3,X7,X8,X9),c_List_Olist_OCons(X1,X10,X11),X11,X12),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1008,c_1178]) ).

tcf(c_2448,plain,
    c_List_Olistsp(c_InductTermi_OIT,c_List_Omap(c_COMBC(c_COMBC(c_Lambda_Osubst,v_u____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_fun(tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB)),v_i____,tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_nat,tc_Lambda_OdB),c_List_Olist_OCons(v_a____,v_as____,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_979,c_2388]) ).

tcf(c_2449,plain,
    $false,
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_980,c_2448]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : LCL830-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.37  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 00:33:48 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.42  
% 0.09/0.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.09/0.42  
% 0.09/0.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.09/0.43  % Proving...
% 0.80/1.29  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.80/1.29  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.80/1.29  
% 0.80/1.29  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 0.80/1.29  
% 0.80/1.29  % ------  iProver source info
% 0.80/1.29  
% 0.80/1.29  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 0.80/1.29  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 0.80/1.29  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.80/1.29  
% 0.80/1.29  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 0.80/1.29  
% 0.80/1.29  
% 0.80/1.29  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 0.80/1.29  % ------ Proving...
% 0.80/1.29  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 0.80/1.29  
% 0.80/1.29  % 
% 0.80/1.29  % clauses                               479
% 0.80/1.29  % conjectures                           1
% 0.80/1.29  % EPR                                   40
% 0.80/1.29  % Horn                                  451
% 0.80/1.29  % unary                                 186
% 0.80/1.29  % binary                                200
% 0.80/1.29  % lits                                  897
% 0.80/1.29  % lits eq                               395
% 0.80/1.29  % fd_pure                               0
% 0.80/1.29  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 0.80/1.29  % fd_cond                               3
% 0.80/1.29  % fd_pseudo_cond                        71
% 0.80/1.29  % AC symbols                            0
% 0.80/1.29  
% 0.80/1.29  % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 0.80/1.29  
% 0.80/1.29  
% 0.80/1.29  % ------ 
% 0.80/1.29  % Current options:
% 0.80/1.29  % ------ 
% 0.80/1.29  
% 0.80/1.29  
% 0.80/1.29  % 
% 0.80/1.29  
% 0.80/1.29  % ------ Proving...
% 0.80/1.29  % 
% 0.80/1.29  
% 0.80/1.29  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.80/1.29  
% 0.80/1.29  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.80/1.29  
% 0.80/1.29  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------