%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : LCL844-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:23:30 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.26s 0.52s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 9 RR)
% Number of literals : 12 ( 0 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 1 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 3 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(v_ta______)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_Lambda_0,axiom,
( ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(X1)
| c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Lambda_0) ).
cnf(cls_Abs_I2_J_0,axiom,
c_InductTermi_OIT(v_ta______),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Abs_I2_J_0) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(v_ta______)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
( ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(X1)
| c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(X1)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Lambda_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(v_ta______)),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(X1)
| c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(X1)) ),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
c_InductTermi_OIT(v_ta______),
cls_Abs_I2_J_0 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : LCL844-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.06 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.42 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.42 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.42 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.42 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/0.42 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/0.42 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.42 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.42 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:13:13 UTC 2026
% 0.16/0.43 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.43 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/0.52 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.26/0.52 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.52 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.52 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.52 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.52 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.52 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.52 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1882676 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.52 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.26/0.52 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.52 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.52 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.52 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.26/0.52 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.26/0.52 % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.52 % Scheduled 11 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.26/0.52 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.52 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.52 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4b with 136s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.52 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.52 % Starting G-E--_208_B07----D_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.52 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1882680 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.52 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.26/0.52 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.52 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.52 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.52 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.26/0.52 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.26/0.52 % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.52 % Scheduled 11 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.26/0.52 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.52 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.26/0.52
% 0.26/0.52 % Proof found!
% 0.26/0.52 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.26/0.52 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/0.53 % Parsed axioms : 69
% 0.26/0.53 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Initial clauses : 69
% 0.26/0.53 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Initial clauses in saturation : 69
% 0.26/0.53 % Processed clauses : 15
% 0.26/0.53 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % ...subsumed : 2
% 0.26/0.53 % ...remaining for further processing : 13
% 0.26/0.53 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Generated clauses : 1
% 0.26/0.53 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Paramodulations : 1
% 0.26/0.53 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % NegExts : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.26/0.53 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.53 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.53 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.53 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.53 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.53 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.53 % Current number of processed clauses : 13
% 0.26/0.53 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 8
% 0.26/0.53 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.26/0.53 % Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.26/0.53 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 54
% 0.26/0.53 % ...number of literals in the above : 122
% 0.26/0.53 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.26/0.53 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1405
% 0.26/0.53 % Search garbage collected termcells : 123
% 0.26/0.53
% 0.26/0.53 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.53 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.26/0.53 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.26/0.53 % Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.26/0.53 % Maximum resident set size: 3368 pages
% 0.26/0.53
% 0.26/0.53 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.53 % User time : 0.010 s
% 0.26/0.53 % System time : 0.018 s
% 0.26/0.53 % Total time : 0.028 s
% 0.26/0.53 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.26/0.53 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------