%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : LCL844-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:08:33 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.42s 6.67s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.42s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 7 unt; 1 def)
% Number of atoms : 16 ( 1 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 9 ( 6 ~; 3 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 2 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 1 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 2 ( 0 sgn 2 !; 0 ?; 1 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f69,axiom,
c_InductTermi_OIT(v_ta______),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Abs_I2_J_0) ).
fof(f75,axiom,
! [X0] :
( ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(X0)
| c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(X0)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Lambda_0) ).
fof(f77,negated_conjecture,
~ c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(v_ta______)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
tcf(c_172,plain,
c_InductTermi_OIT(v_ta______),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f69]) ).
tcf(c_177,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(X0))
| ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f75]) ).
tcf(c_179,negated_conjecture,
~ c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(v_ta______)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f77]) ).
tcf(c_1143,definition,
iPr_def_10 = c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(v_ta______),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).
tcf(c_1144,negated_conjecture,
~ c_InductTermi_OIT(iPr_def_10),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_179,c_1143]) ).
tcf(c_1938,plain,
( c_InductTermi_OIT(iPr_def_10)
| ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(v_ta______) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1143,c_177]) ).
tcf(c_1939,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1938,c_1144,c_172]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : LCL844-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.12/5.59 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/5.59 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/5.59 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/5.59 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/5.59 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/5.59 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/5.59 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/5.59 % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 00:38:10 UTC 2026
% 0.12/5.59 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/5.59 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.18/5.65 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/5.65 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/5.67
% 0.18/5.67 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.18/5.67
% 0.18/5.67 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.18/5.69 % Proving...
% 1.42/6.67 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.42/6.67 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.42/6.67
% 1.42/6.67 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.42/6.67
% 1.42/6.67 % ------ iProver source info
% 1.42/6.67
% 1.42/6.67 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.42/6.67 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.42/6.67 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.42/6.67
% 1.42/6.67 % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 1.42/6.67
% 1.42/6.67
% 1.42/6.67 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 1.42/6.67
% 1.42/6.67 % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 7 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 1.42/6.67
% 1.42/6.67 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 1.42/6.67
% 1.42/6.67 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 1.42/6.67 % ------ Proving...
% 1.42/6.67 % ------ Problem Properties
% 1.42/6.67
% 1.42/6.67 %
% 1.42/6.67 % clauses 43
% 1.42/6.67 % conjectures 1
% 1.42/6.67 % EPR 6
% 1.42/6.67 % Horn 40
% 1.42/6.67 % unary 16
% 1.42/6.67 % binary 24
% 1.42/6.67 % lits 73
% 1.42/6.67 % lits eq 26
% 1.42/6.67 % fd_pure 0
% 1.42/6.67 % fd_pseudo 0
% 1.42/6.67 % fd_cond 1
% 1.42/6.67 % fd_pseudo_cond 7
% 1.42/6.67 % AC symbols 0
% 1.42/6.67
% 1.42/6.67 % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 1.42/6.67
% 1.42/6.67 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.42/6.67
% 1.42/6.67
% 1.42/6.67 % ------
% 1.42/6.67 % Current options:
% 1.42/6.67 % ------
% 1.42/6.67
% 1.42/6.67
% 1.42/6.67 %
% 1.42/6.67
% 1.42/6.67 % ------ Proving...
% 1.42/6.67 %
% 1.42/6.67
% 1.42/6.67 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.42/6.67
% 1.42/6.67 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.42/6.67
% 1.42/6.67
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------