%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : LCL849-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep 7 12:02:09 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.45s
% Output : Assurance 0s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : LCL849-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.10/0.35 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Sep 5 04:34:12 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.45 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.45 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S0Y
% 0.13/0.45 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 0.13/0.45 #
% 0.13/0.45 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.13/0.45
% 0.13/0.45 # Proof found!
% 0.13/0.45 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.13/0.45 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.13/0.45 cnf(cls_conjecture_0, negated_conjecture, (c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_List_Olist_OCons(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Olift,v_ta____),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB)!=hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))),hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Olift,v_ta____),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cls_conjecture_0)).
% 0.13/0.45 cnf(cls_foldl__Cons_0, axiom, (c_List_Ofoldl(X1,X2,c_List_Olist_OCons(X3,X4,X5),X6,X5)=c_List_Ofoldl(X1,hAPP(hAPP(X1,X2),X3),X4,X6,X5)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cls_foldl__Cons_0)).
% 0.13/0.45 cnf(cls_foldl__Nil_0, axiom, (c_List_Ofoldl(X1,X2,c_List_Olist_ONil(X3),X4,X3)=X2), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cls_foldl__Nil_0)).
% 0.13/0.45 cnf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, (c_List_Ofoldl(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_List_Olist_OCons(hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Olift,v_ta____),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_List_Olist_ONil(tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB),tc_Lambda_OdB,tc_Lambda_OdB)!=hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))),hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_Olift,v_ta____),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)))), cls_conjecture_0).
% 0.13/0.45 cnf(c_0_4, axiom, (c_List_Ofoldl(X1,X2,c_List_Olist_OCons(X3,X4,X5),X6,X5)=c_List_Ofoldl(X1,hAPP(hAPP(X1,X2),X3),X4,X6,X5)), cls_foldl__Cons_0).
% 0.13/0.45 cnf(c_0_5, axiom, (c_List_Ofoldl(X1,X2,c_List_Olist_ONil(X3),X4,X3)=X2), cls_foldl__Nil_0).
% 0.13/0.45 cnf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4]), c_0_5])]), ['proof']).
% 0.13/0.45 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.13/0.45 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------