%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : LCL850-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:16:36 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.07s 0.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.07s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR)
% Number of literals : 9 ( 2 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 5 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_ea____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),c_Type_Otype_OFun(v_Ta____,v_U____),tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_Type_Otype_OFun(v_Ta____,v_U____)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_typing_OVar_0,axiom,
c_Type_Otyping(X1,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(X2),hAPP(X1,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_typing_OVar_0) ).
cnf(cls_shift__eq_0,axiom,
hAPP(c_Type_Oshift(X1,X2,X3,X4),X2) = X3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_shift__eq_0) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_ea____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),c_Type_Otype_OFun(v_Ta____,v_U____),tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_Type_Otype_OFun(v_Ta____,v_U____)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
c_Type_Otyping(X1,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(X2),hAPP(X1,X2)),
cls_typing_OVar_0 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
hAPP(c_Type_Oshift(X1,X2,X3,X4),X2) = X3,
cls_shift__eq_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_ea____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),c_Type_Otype_OFun(v_Ta____,v_U____),tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_Type_Otype_OFun(v_Ta____,v_U____)),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(X1,X2,X3,X4),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(X2),X3),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01 % Problem : LCL850-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.02 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.03/0.31 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.03/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.03/0.31 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.03/0.31 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.03/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.03/0.31 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:07:52 UTC 2026
% 0.03/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.03/0.31 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.33 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.07/0.33 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.42 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.07/0.42 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.07/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.07/0.42 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.07/0.42 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.07/0.42 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.42 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.42 % G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with pid 1275503 completed with status 0
% 0.07/0.42 % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S
% 0.07/0.42 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.07/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.07/0.42 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.07/0.42 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.07/0.42 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.07/0.42 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.07/0.42 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 4 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
% 0.07/0.42 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 109s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.42 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 121s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.42 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 90s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.42 % Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 90s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.42 % G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 1275514 completed with status 0
% 0.07/0.42 % Result found by G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.07/0.42 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.07/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.07/0.42 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.07/0.42 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.07/0.42 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.07/0.42 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.07/0.42 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 4 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
% 0.07/0.42 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 109s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.42 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 121s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.42 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 90s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.42 % Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 90s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.42 % Preprocessing time : 0.007 s
% 0.07/0.42 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.07/0.42
% 0.07/0.42 % Proof found!
% 0.07/0.42 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.07/0.42 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.07/0.42 % Parsed axioms : 902
% 0.07/0.42 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.07/0.42 % Initial clauses : 902
% 0.07/0.42 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.07/0.42 % Initial clauses in saturation : 901
% 0.07/0.42 % Processed clauses : 1064
% 0.07/0.42 % ...of these trivial : 40
% 0.07/0.42 % ...subsumed : 154
% 0.07/0.42 % ...remaining for further processing : 870
% 0.07/0.42 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.07/0.42 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.07/0.42 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.07/0.42 % Backward-rewritten : 9
% 0.07/0.42 % Generated clauses : 99
% 0.07/0.42 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 60
% 0.07/0.42 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.07/0.42 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.07/0.42 % Paramodulations : 94
% 0.07/0.42 % Factorizations : 2
% 0.07/0.42 % NegExts : 0
% 0.07/0.42 % Equation resolutions : 3
% 0.07/0.42 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.07/0.42 % Total rewrite steps : 146
% 0.07/0.42 % ...of those cached : 69
% 0.07/0.42 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.07/0.42 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.07/0.42 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.07/0.42 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.07/0.42 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.07/0.42 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.07/0.42 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.42 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.42 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.42 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.42 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.42 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.42 % Current number of processed clauses : 135
% 0.07/0.42 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 93
% 0.07/0.42 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.07/0.42 % Negative unit clauses : 17
% 0.07/0.42 % Non-unit-clauses : 24
% 0.07/0.42 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 621
% 0.07/0.42 % ...number of literals in the above : 1646
% 0.07/0.42 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.07/0.42 % Current number of archived clauses : 736
% 0.07/0.42 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 46756
% 0.07/0.42 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 30139
% 0.07/0.42 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 128
% 0.07/0.42 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 344
% 0.07/0.42 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.07/0.42 % BW rewrite match attempts : 79
% 0.07/0.42 % BW rewrite match successes : 36
% 0.07/0.42 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.07/0.42 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.07/0.42 % Termbank termtop insertions : 41092
% 0.07/0.42 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1641
% 0.07/0.42
% 0.07/0.42 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.07/0.42 % User time : 0.063 s
% 0.07/0.42 % System time : 0.005 s
% 0.07/0.42 % Total time : 0.069 s
% 0.07/0.42 % Maximum resident set size: 5288 pages
% 0.07/0.42
% 0.07/0.42 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.07/0.42 % User time : 0.238 s
% 0.07/0.42 % System time : 0.017 s
% 0.07/0.42 % Total time : 0.254 s
% 0.07/0.42 % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 0.07/0.42 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------