%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem : LCL850-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satcop --statistics %s
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep 7 01:04:47 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.37s
% Output : Proof 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_ea____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),c_Type_Otype_OFun(v_Ta____,v_U____),tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_Type_Otype_OFun(v_Ta____,v_U____)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0)]) ).
cnf(g1,plain,
sPE(c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g2,plain,
( ~ sPE(c_Type_Oshift(v_ea____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),c_Type_Otype_OFun(v_Ta____,v_U____),tc_Type_Otype),c_Type_Oshift(v_ea____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),c_Type_Otype_OFun(v_Ta____,v_U____),tc_Type_Otype))
| ~ sPE(c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)))
| ~ sPE(hAPP(c_Type_Oshift(v_ea____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),c_Type_Otype_OFun(v_Ta____,v_U____),tc_Type_Otype),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_Type_Otype_OFun(v_Ta____,v_U____))
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_ea____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),c_Type_Otype_OFun(v_Ta____,v_U____),tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),hAPP(c_Type_Oshift(v_ea____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),c_Type_Otype_OFun(v_Ta____,v_U____),tc_Type_Otype),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)))
| c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_ea____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),c_Type_Otype_OFun(v_Ta____,v_U____),tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_Type_Otype_OFun(v_Ta____,v_U____)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g3,plain,
c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_ea____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),c_Type_Otype_OFun(v_Ta____,v_U____),tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),hAPP(c_Type_Oshift(v_ea____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),c_Type_Otype_OFun(v_Ta____,v_U____),tc_Type_Otype),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_typing_OVar_0)]) ).
cnf(g4,plain,
sPE(hAPP(c_Type_Oshift(v_ea____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),c_Type_Otype_OFun(v_Ta____,v_U____),tc_Type_Otype),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_Type_Otype_OFun(v_Ta____,v_U____)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_shift__eq_0)]) ).
cnf(g5,plain,
sPE(c_Type_Oshift(v_ea____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),c_Type_Otype_OFun(v_Ta____,v_U____),tc_Type_Otype),c_Type_Oshift(v_ea____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),c_Type_Otype_OFun(v_Ta____,v_U____),tc_Type_Otype)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : LCL850-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.03 % Command : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.08/0.35 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35 % DateTime : Fri Sep 4 18:03:28 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.37 % symbols: 119
% 0.12/0.37 % clauses: 1011
% 0.12/0.37 % start clauses: 1
% 0.12/0.37 % iterative deepening steps: 37
% 0.12/0.37 % maximum path limit: 2
% 0.12/0.37 % literal attempts: 847
% 0.12/0.37 % depth failures: 724
% 0.12/0.37 % regularity failures: 0
% 0.12/0.37 % tautology failures: 0
% 0.12/0.37 % reductions: 0
% 0.12/0.37 % extensions: 821
% 0.12/0.37 % SAT variables: 1004
% 0.12/0.37 % SAT clauses: 844
% 0.12/0.37 % WalkSAT solutions: 841
% 0.12/0.37 % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.12/0.37 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.37 % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------