↑ Up

CSI_E---1.1.UNS-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSI_E---1.1
% Problem  : LCL851-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 11:21:50 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.46s 0.52s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem    : LCL851-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command    : java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.06/0.33  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.33  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.06/0.33  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.06/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.06/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.06/0.33  % DateTime   : Sat Sep  5 17:05:45 UTC 2026
% 0.06/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.17/0.41  start to proof:theBenchmark.p
% 0.46/0.52  % Version  : CSI_E---1.1
% 0.46/0.52  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.46/0.52  % Proof found!
% 0.46/0.52  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.46/0.52  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.46/0.52  cnf(cls_conjecture_0, negated_conjecture, (~c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_ea____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),c_Type_Otype_OFun(v_Ta____,v_U____),tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_Olift(v_ta____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),v_Ta____)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cls_conjecture_0)).
% 0.46/0.52  cnf(cls_lift__type_0, axiom, (c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(X1,X2,X3,tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_Olift(X4,X2),X5)|~c_Type_Otyping(X1,X4,X5)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cls_lift__type_0)).
% 0.46/0.52  cnf(cls_App_I3_J_0, axiom, (c_Type_Otyping(v_ea____,v_ta____,v_Ta____)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cls_App_I3_J_0)).
% 0.46/0.52  cnf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, (~c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_ea____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),c_Type_Otype_OFun(v_Ta____,v_U____),tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_Olift(v_ta____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),v_Ta____)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0])).
% 0.46/0.52  cnf(c_0_4, plain, (c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(X1,X2,X3,tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_Olift(X4,X2),X5)|~c_Type_Otyping(X1,X4,X5)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_lift__type_0])).
% 0.46/0.52  cnf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, (~c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_ea____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),c_Type_Otype_OFun(v_Ta____,v_U____),tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_Olift(v_ta____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),v_Ta____)), c_0_3).
% 0.46/0.52  cnf(c_0_6, plain, (c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(X1,X2,X3,tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_Olift(X4,X2),X5)|~c_Type_Otyping(X1,X4,X5)), c_0_4).
% 0.46/0.52  cnf(c_0_7, axiom, (c_Type_Otyping(v_ea____,v_ta____,v_Ta____)), cls_App_I3_J_0).
% 0.46/0.52  cnf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_6]), c_0_7])]), ['proof']).
% 0.46/0.52  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.46/0.52  % User time                : 0.023 s
% 0.46/0.52  % System time              : 0.012 s
% 0.46/0.52  % Total time               : 0.035 s
% 0.46/0.52  % User time                : 0.047 s
% 0.46/0.52  % System time              : 0.017 s
% 0.46/0.52  % Total time               : 0.064 s
% 0.46/0.52  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------