↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : LCL852-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:59:56 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 31.07s 4.93s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 31.07s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   24 (   2 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   16 (   9   ~;   7   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   13 (  13 usr;   8 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   44 (   6 sgn  16   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(cls_lift__type_0,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3,VAR_4] :
      ( ~ c_Type_Otyping(VAR_0,VAR_3,VAR_4)
      | c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_Olift(VAR_3,VAR_1),VAR_4) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cls_lift__type_0) ).

cnf(c_530,plain,
    ( ~ c_Type_Otyping(A,D,E)
    | c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(A,B,C,tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_Olift(D,B),E) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cls_lift__type_0]) ).

fof(cls_typing_OApp_0,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3,VAR_4] :
      ( ~ c_Type_Otyping(VAR_0,VAR_1,hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otype_OFun,VAR_4),VAR_3))
      | ~ c_Type_Otyping(VAR_0,VAR_2,VAR_4)
      | c_Type_Otyping(VAR_0,hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,VAR_1),VAR_2),VAR_3) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cls_typing_OApp_0) ).

cnf(c_534,plain,
    ( ~ c_Type_Otyping(A,B,hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otype_OFun,E),D))
    | ~ c_Type_Otyping(A,C,E)
    | c_Type_Otyping(A,hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,B),C),D) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cls_typing_OApp_0]) ).

fof(cls_shift__eq_0,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] : hAPP(c_Type_Oshift(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3),VAR_1) = VAR_2,
    file('theBenchmark.p',cls_shift__eq_0) ).

cnf(c_538,plain,
    hAPP(c_Type_Oshift(A,B,C,D),B) = C,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cls_shift__eq_0]) ).

fof(cls_App_I3_J_0,axiom,
    c_Type_Otyping(v_ea____,v_ta____,v_Ta____),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cls_App_I3_J_0) ).

cnf(c_542,plain,
    c_Type_Otyping(v_ea____,v_ta____,v_Ta____),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cls_App_I3_J_0]) ).

fof(cls_typing_OVar_0,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : c_Type_Otyping(VAR_0,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(VAR_1),hAPP(VAR_0,VAR_1)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cls_typing_OVar_0) ).

cnf(c_543,plain,
    c_Type_Otyping(A,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(B),hAPP(A,B)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cls_typing_OVar_0]) ).

fof(cls_conjecture_0,axiom,
    ~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_ea____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ta____),v_U____),tc_Type_Otype),hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))),c_Lambda_Olift(v_ta____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))),v_U____),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(c_547,plain,
    ~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_ea____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ta____),v_U____),tc_Type_Otype),hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))),c_Lambda_Olift(v_ta____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))),v_U____),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).

cnf(c_2056,plain,
    c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_ea____,A,B,tc_Type_Otype),c_Lambda_Olift(v_ta____,A),v_Ta____),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_542,c_530]) ).

cnf(c_2086,plain,
    c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(A,B,C,D),c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(B),C),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_538,c_543]) ).

cnf(c_8317,plain,
    ( ~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_ea____,A,B,tc_Type_Otype),C,hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ta____),D))
    | c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_ea____,A,B,tc_Type_Otype),hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,C),c_Lambda_Olift(v_ta____,A)),D) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_534,c_2056]) ).

cnf(c_8315,plain,
    c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_ea____,A,hAPP(hAPP(c_Type_Otype_OFun,v_Ta____),B),tc_Type_Otype),hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(A)),c_Lambda_Olift(v_ta____,A)),B),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_8317,c_2086]) ).

cnf(c_8316,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_8315,c_547]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL852-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.35  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 23:46:07 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.36  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.10/0.36  % Process 292104 was started by sandbox on n002,
% 0.10/0.36  % Fri Sep 25 23:46:07 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 31.07/4.93  
% 31.07/4.93  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 31.07/4.93  
% 31.07/4.93  % Proof 1 at 3.77 (+ 0.56) seconds.
% 31.07/4.93  % Length of proof is 10.
% 31.07/4.93  % Level of proof is 3.
% 31.07/4.93  % Maximum clause weight is 57.000.
% 31.07/4.93  % Given clauses 442.
% 31.07/4.93  
% 31.07/4.93  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------