↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : LCL855-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:08:35 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 4.40s 16.62s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.40s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   13 (   7 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    2 (   2   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   21 (   0 sgn  21   !;   0   ?;  12   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f416,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : c_Lambda_Osubst(c_Lambda_Olift(X0,X1),X2,X1) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_subst__lift_0) ).

fof(f438,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : c_Lambda_Osubst(c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(X0),X1,X0) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_subst__eq_0) ).

fof(f443,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] : c_Lambda_Osubst(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(X0,X1),X2,X3) = c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(c_Lambda_Osubst(X0,X2,X3),c_Lambda_Osubst(X1,X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_subst__App_0) ).

fof(f461,axiom,
    c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Osubst(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_Lambda_Olift(v_ta____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))),v_s____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).

fof(f462,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(v_s____,v_ta____)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

tcf(c_433,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(v_s____,v_ta____)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f462]) ).

tcf(c_438,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] : c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(c_Lambda_Osubst(X0,X1,X2),c_Lambda_Osubst(X3,X1,X2)) = c_Lambda_Osubst(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(X0,X3),X1,X2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f443]) ).

tcf(c_439,plain,
    c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Osubst(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),c_Lambda_Olift(v_ta____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))),v_s____,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f461]) ).

tcf(c_451,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : c_Lambda_Osubst(c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(X0),X1,X0) = X1,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f438]) ).

tcf(c_514,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : c_Lambda_Osubst(c_Lambda_Olift(X0,X1),X2,X1) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f416]) ).

tcf(c_5485,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : c_Lambda_Osubst(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(X0),X1),X2,X0) = c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(X2,c_Lambda_Osubst(X1,X2,X0)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_451,c_438]) ).

tcf(c_6703,plain,
    c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(v_s____,v_ta____)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_439,c_514,c_5485]) ).

tcf(c_6704,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_6703,c_433]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : LCL855-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.15/15.63  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.15/15.63  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/15.63  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/15.63  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.15/15.63  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.15/15.63  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/15.63  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/15.63  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 00:36:00 UTC 2026
% 0.15/15.64  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/15.64  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.15/15.69  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/15.69  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/15.71  
% 0.19/15.71  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.19/15.71  
% 0.19/15.71  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.19/15.73  % Proving...
% 4.40/16.62  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 4.40/16.62  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 4.40/16.62  
% 4.40/16.62  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 4.40/16.62  
% 4.40/16.62  % ------  iProver source info
% 4.40/16.62  
% 4.40/16.62  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 4.40/16.62  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 4.40/16.62  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 4.40/16.62  
% 4.40/16.62  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 4.40/16.62  
% 4.40/16.62  
% 4.40/16.62  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 4.40/16.62  
% 4.40/16.62  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 9  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 4.40/16.62  
% 4.40/16.62  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 4.40/16.62  
% 4.40/16.62  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 4.40/16.62  % ------ Proving...
% 4.40/16.62  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 4.40/16.62  
% 4.40/16.62  % 
% 4.40/16.62  % clauses                               140
% 4.40/16.62  % conjectures                           1
% 4.40/16.62  % EPR                                   5
% 4.40/16.62  % Horn                                  123
% 4.40/16.62  % unary                                 59
% 4.40/16.62  % binary                                55
% 4.40/16.62  % lits                                  247
% 4.40/16.62  % lits eq                               114
% 4.40/16.62  % fd_pure                               0
% 4.40/16.62  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 4.40/16.62  % fd_cond                               12
% 4.40/16.62  % fd_pseudo_cond                        17
% 4.40/16.62  % AC symbols                            0
% 4.40/16.62  
% 4.40/16.62  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 4.40/16.62  
% 4.40/16.62  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 4.40/16.62  
% 4.40/16.62  
% 4.40/16.62  % ------ 
% 4.40/16.62  % Current options:
% 4.40/16.62  % ------ 
% 4.40/16.62  
% 4.40/16.62  
% 4.40/16.62  % 
% 4.40/16.62  
% 4.40/16.62  % ------ Proving...
% 4.40/16.62  % 
% 4.40/16.62  
% 4.40/16.62  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 4.40/16.62  
% 4.40/16.62  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.40/16.62  
% 4.40/16.62  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------