↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : LCL897+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:08:38 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 31.08s 5.86s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 31.08s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   20
%            Number of leaves      :   17
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   81 (  81 unt;   9 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  182 (  80 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    7 (   7   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   11 (   9 usr;  10 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   62 (   0 sgn  62   !;   0   ?;  36   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : '+'('+'(X0,X1),X2) = '+'(X0,'+'(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_01) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : '+'(X0,X1) = '+'(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_02) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0] : '+'(X0,'0') = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_03) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0] : '==>'(X0,X0) = '0',
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_04) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0] : '==>'(X0,'0') = '0',
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_05) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : '==>'('+'(X0,X1),X2) = '==>'(X0,'==>'(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_07) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : '+'(X0,'==>'(X0,X1)) = '+'(X1,'==>'(X1,X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_08) ).

fof(f9,conjecture,
    '+'('+'(a,'==>'(a,b)),'==>'('+'(a,'==>'(a,b)),c)) = '+'(a,'==>'(a,'+'(b,'==>'(b,c)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals_09) ).

fof(f10,negated_conjecture,
    '+'('+'(a,'==>'(a,b)),'==>'('+'(a,'==>'(a,b)),c)) != '+'(a,'==>'(a,'+'(b,'==>'(b,c)))),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f9]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    '+'('+'(a,'==>'(a,b)),'==>'('+'(a,'==>'(a,b)),c)) != '+'(a,'==>'(a,'+'(b,'==>'(b,c)))),
    inference(flattening,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    '+'('+'(a,'==>'(a,b)),'==>'('+'(a,'==>'(a,b)),c)) != '+'(a,'==>'(a,'+'(b,'==>'(b,c)))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : '+'(X0,'==>'(X0,X1)) = '+'(X1,'==>'(X1,X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : '==>'('+'(X0,X1),X2) = '==>'(X0,'==>'(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : '+'(X0,X1) = '+'(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : '+'('+'(X0,X1),X2) = '+'(X0,'+'(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ! [X0] : '+'(X0,'0') = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ! [X0] : '0' = '==>'(X0,'0'),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ! [X0] : '0' = '==>'(X0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tcf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
    '+'('+'(a,'==>'(a,b)),'==>'('+'(a,'==>'(a,b)),c)) != '+'(a,'==>'(a,'+'(b,'==>'(b,c)))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

tcf(c_50,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : '+'(X0,'==>'(X0,X1)) = '+'(X1,'==>'(X1,X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

tcf(c_51,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : '==>'('+'(X0,X1),X2) = '==>'(X0,'==>'(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

tcf(c_52,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : '+'(X0,X1) = '+'(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

tcf(c_53,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : '+'('+'(X0,X1),X2) = '+'(X0,'+'(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

tcf(c_54,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : '+'(X0,'0') = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

tcf(c_56,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : '==>'(X0,'0') = '0',
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

tcf(c_57,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : '==>'(X0,X0) = '0',
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

tcf(c_66,negated_conjecture,
    '+'(a,'+'('==>'(a,b),'==>'('+'(a,'==>'(a,b)),c))) != '+'(a,'==>'(a,'+'(b,'==>'(b,c)))),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_53,c_52]) ).

tcf(c_85,plain,
    '+'(a,'+'('==>'(a,b),'==>'(a,'==>'('==>'(a,b),c)))) != '+'(a,'==>'(a,'+'(b,'==>'(b,c)))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_66,c_51]) ).

tcf(c_90,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = '==>'(a,b),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_91,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = '==>'(iPr_def_10,c),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_92,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = '==>'(a,iPr_def_11),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_93,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = '+'(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_94,definition,
    iPr_def_14 = '+'(a,iPr_def_13),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).

tcf(c_95,definition,
    iPr_def_15 = '==>'(b,c),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_15])],[]) ).

tcf(c_96,definition,
    iPr_def_16 = '+'(b,iPr_def_15),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_16])],[]) ).

tcf(c_97,definition,
    iPr_def_17 = '==>'(a,iPr_def_16),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_17])],[]) ).

tcf(c_98,definition,
    iPr_def_18 = '+'(a,iPr_def_17),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_18])],[]) ).

tcf(c_99,plain,
    iPr_def_14 != iPr_def_18,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_85,c_95,c_96,c_97,c_98,c_91,c_92,c_90,c_93,c_94]) ).

tcf(c_163,plain,
    '+'(iPr_def_13,a) = iPr_def_14,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_94,c_53,c_52]) ).

tcf(c_164,plain,
    '+'(iPr_def_15,b) = iPr_def_16,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_96,c_53,c_52]) ).

tcf(c_165,plain,
    '+'(iPr_def_17,a) = iPr_def_18,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_98,c_53,c_52]) ).

tcf(c_166,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : '+'('0',X0) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_52]) ).

tcf(c_184,plain,
    '+'(iPr_def_16,'==>'(iPr_def_16,a)) = '+'(a,iPr_def_17),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_97,c_50]) ).

tcf(c_188,plain,
    '+'(iPr_def_16,'==>'(iPr_def_16,a)) = '+'(iPr_def_17,a),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_184,c_53,c_52]) ).

tcf(c_189,plain,
    '+'(iPr_def_16,'==>'(iPr_def_16,a)) = iPr_def_18,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_188,c_165]) ).

tcf(c_198,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : '==>'('+'(X0,'==>'(X0,X1)),X2) = '==>'(X1,'==>'('==>'(X1,X0),X2)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_51]) ).

tcf(c_200,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : '==>'('+'(X0,X1),X2) = '==>'(X1,'==>'(X0,X2)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_51]) ).

tcf(c_206,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : '==>'(iPr_def_15,'==>'(b,X0)) = '==>'(iPr_def_16,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_164,c_51]) ).

tcf(c_207,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : '==>'(iPr_def_17,'==>'(a,X0)) = '==>'(iPr_def_18,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_165,c_51]) ).

tcf(c_209,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : '==>'(iPr_def_16,'==>'('==>'(iPr_def_16,a),X0)) = '==>'(iPr_def_18,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_189,c_51]) ).

tcf(c_282,plain,
    '==>'(iPr_def_15,iPr_def_15) = '==>'(iPr_def_16,c),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_95,c_206]) ).

tcf(c_284,plain,
    '==>'(iPr_def_15,'0') = '==>'(iPr_def_16,b),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_57,c_206]) ).

tcf(c_285,plain,
    '==>'(iPr_def_16,c) = '0',
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_282,c_57]) ).

tcf(c_286,plain,
    '==>'(iPr_def_16,b) = '0',
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_284,c_56]) ).

tcf(c_288,plain,
    '==>'(iPr_def_17,iPr_def_10) = '==>'(iPr_def_18,b),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_90,c_207]) ).

tcf(c_297,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : '==>'('==>'(X0,X1),'==>'(X0,X2)) = '==>'(X1,'==>'('==>'(X1,X0),X2)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_198,c_200]) ).

tcf(c_320,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : '==>'(X0,'==>'('==>'(X0,b),c)) = '==>'('==>'(b,X0),iPr_def_15),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_95,c_297]) ).

tcf(c_327,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : '==>'(X0,'==>'('==>'(X0,a),iPr_def_16)) = '==>'('==>'(a,X0),iPr_def_17),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_97,c_297]) ).

tcf(c_588,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : '==>'(X0,'==>'(X1,X2)) = '==>'(X1,'==>'(X0,X2)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_200,c_51]) ).

tcf(c_2299,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : '==>'(iPr_def_16,'==>'(X0,c)) = '==>'(X0,'0'),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_285,c_588]) ).

tcf(c_2300,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : '==>'(iPr_def_16,'==>'(X0,b)) = '==>'(X0,'0'),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_286,c_588]) ).

tcf(c_2418,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : '==>'(iPr_def_16,'==>'(X0,b)) = '0',
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2300,c_56]) ).

tcf(c_2419,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : '==>'(iPr_def_16,'==>'(X0,c)) = '0',
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2299,c_56]) ).

tcf(c_2598,plain,
    '==>'(iPr_def_18,b) = '0',
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2418,c_209]) ).

tcf(c_2602,plain,
    '==>'(iPr_def_17,iPr_def_10) = '0',
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_288,c_2598]) ).

tcf(c_2638,plain,
    '+'(iPr_def_10,'==>'(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_17)) = '+'(iPr_def_17,'0'),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2602,c_50]) ).

tcf(c_5183,plain,
    '+'(iPr_def_10,'==>'(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_17)) = iPr_def_17,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_2638,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_11172,plain,
    '==>'('==>'(b,a),iPr_def_15) = '==>'(a,'==>'(iPr_def_10,c)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_90,c_320]) ).

tcf(c_11209,plain,
    '==>'('==>'(b,iPr_def_16),iPr_def_15) = '0',
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_320,c_2419]) ).

tcf(c_11222,plain,
    '==>'('==>'(b,a),iPr_def_15) = iPr_def_12,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_11172,c_91,c_92]) ).

tcf(c_11403,plain,
    '+'(iPr_def_15,'==>'(iPr_def_15,'==>'(b,iPr_def_16))) = '+'('==>'(b,iPr_def_16),'0'),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_11209,c_50]) ).

tcf(c_11421,plain,
    '+'(iPr_def_15,'==>'(iPr_def_15,'==>'(b,iPr_def_16))) = '+'('0','==>'(b,iPr_def_16)),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_11403,c_53,c_52]) ).

tcf(c_96515,plain,
    '==>'(b,iPr_def_16) = iPr_def_15,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_11421,c_54,c_57,c_166,c_206]) ).

tcf(c_96544,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : '==>'(b,'==>'(X0,iPr_def_16)) = '==>'(X0,iPr_def_15),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_96515,c_588]) ).

tcf(c_98272,plain,
    '==>'('==>'(a,b),iPr_def_17) = '==>'('==>'(b,a),iPr_def_15),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_96544,c_327]) ).

tcf(c_98285,plain,
    '==>'(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_17) = iPr_def_12,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_98272,c_90,c_11222]) ).

tcf(c_98304,plain,
    '+'(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12) = iPr_def_17,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_5183,c_98285]) ).

tcf(c_98305,plain,
    iPr_def_13 = iPr_def_17,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_98304,c_93]) ).

tcf(c_98449,plain,
    '+'(iPr_def_13,a) = iPr_def_18,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_165,c_98305]) ).

tcf(c_98451,plain,
    iPr_def_14 = iPr_def_18,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_98449,c_163]) ).

tcf(c_98452,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_98451,c_99]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL897+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.5.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 00:37:37 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.43  
% 0.10/0.43  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/0.43  
% 0.10/0.43  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.10/0.44  % Proving...
% 31.08/5.86  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 31.08/5.86  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 31.08/5.86  
% 31.08/5.86  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 31.08/5.86  
% 31.08/5.86  % ------  iProver source info
% 31.08/5.86  
% 31.08/5.86  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 31.08/5.86  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 31.08/5.86  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 31.08/5.86  
% 31.08/5.86  % ------ Parsing...
% 31.08/5.86  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% ------  preprocesses with Option_UEQ
% 31.08/5.86  % 
% 31.08/5.86  
% 31.08/5.86  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 31.08/5.86  
% 31.08/5.86  % ------ Preprocessing...% ------  preprocesses with Option_UEQ
% 31.08/5.86   gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 31.08/5.86  
% 31.08/5.86  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 31.08/5.86  % ------ Proving...
% 31.08/5.86  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 31.08/5.86  
% 31.08/5.86  % 
% 31.08/5.86  % clauses                               18
% 31.08/5.86  % conjectures                           0
% 31.08/5.86  % EPR                                   1
% 31.08/5.86  % Horn                                  18
% 31.08/5.86  % unary                                 18
% 31.08/5.86  % binary                                0
% 31.08/5.86  % lits                                  18
% 31.08/5.86  % lits eq                               18
% 31.08/5.86  % fd_pure                               0
% 31.08/5.86  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 31.08/5.86  % fd_cond                               0
% 31.08/5.86  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 31.08/5.86  % AC symbols                            1
% 31.08/5.86  
% 31.08/5.86  % ------ Schedule UEQ
% 31.08/5.86  
% 31.08/5.86  % ------ Option_UEQ Time Limit: 10.
% 31.08/5.86  
% 31.08/5.86  
% 31.08/5.86  % ------ 
% 31.08/5.86  % Current options:
% 31.08/5.86  % ------ 
% 31.08/5.86  
% 31.08/5.86  
% 31.08/5.86  % 
% 31.08/5.86  
% 31.08/5.86  % ------ Proving...
% 31.08/5.86  % 
% 31.08/5.86  
% 31.08/5.86  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 31.08/5.86  
% 31.08/5.86  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 31.08/5.86  
% 31.08/5.86  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------